Landlord Wins Rent Reduction Dispute: Metropole Management v Ivanov
Landlord wins application to vary rent reduction in Toronto property
Summarized by RentZenLast updated: July 26, 2024
Case Summary
Unit ****, 39 Pemberton Avenue, Toronto, ON M2M4L6
Decision in favor of
landlord
Balance Owed
-
Dispute Categories
Agree with the ruling?
Timeline
Order Date
Nov 30, 2020
Dispute Summary
Landlord applied for an order to vary the percentage rent reduction determined under section 132 of the Residential Tenancies Act, 2006 because the residential complex does not fall under the multi-residential property tax class as defined under the Assessment Act and the amount of the municipal property taxes in respect of the residential complex does not rise to 15% of the total annual rents charged in the residential complex.
Determinations
- The residential complex does not fall under the multi-residential property tax class as defined under the Assessment Act and the amount of the municipal property taxes in respect of the residential complex does not rise to 15% of the total annual rents charged in the residential complex.
- Pursuant to section 132 of the Act and subsection 42(1)(b) of O. Reg 516/06, the Landlord is entitled to an order varying the percentage rent reduction determined by the City of Toronto.
Decision Summary
The rent charged for the rental unit is reduced by 0.31% effective December 31, 2018. The Landlord or the Tenant shall pay to the other any sum of money that is owed as a result of this order within 60 days of the order issuance date.
Adjudicator Details
LTB Member
Total Orders
20
Landlord Favorable
90.0%
Tenant Favorable
5.0%
Mutual Agreement
5.0%
Need assistance from an expert?
Sponsored
Source
Similar Cases
Click to switch between case outcomes
Sripathy v Chilvers
Waterdown landlords regain possession of rental unit for personal use, tenant must vacate by January 31, 2025.
Singh v Gray
LTB upholds consent order terminating tenancy for non-payment of rent in Toronto.
Yassin v Smith
Pickering tenant faces potential eviction after dispute over rent increase and arrears
Hazelview Property Services Inc. v Fatemi
Toronto tenant evicted for non-payment of rent, owes $8,938.24 to landlord.
Sripathy v Chilvers
Waterdown landlords regain possession of rental unit for personal use, tenant must vacate by January 31, 2025.
Singh v Gray
LTB upholds consent order terminating tenancy for non-payment of rent in Toronto.
Yassin v Smith
Pickering tenant faces potential eviction after dispute over rent increase and arrears
Hazelview Property Services Inc. v Fatemi
Toronto tenant evicted for non-payment of rent, owes $8,938.24 to landlord.
Sripathy v Chilvers
Waterdown landlords regain possession of rental unit for personal use, tenant must vacate by January 31, 2025.
Singh v Gray
LTB upholds consent order terminating tenancy for non-payment of rent in Toronto.
Yassin v Smith
Pickering tenant faces potential eviction after dispute over rent increase and arrears
Hazelview Property Services Inc. v Fatemi
Toronto tenant evicted for non-payment of rent, owes $8,938.24 to landlord.
Sripathy v Chilvers
Waterdown landlords regain possession of rental unit for personal use, tenant must vacate by January 31, 2025.
Singh v Gray
LTB upholds consent order terminating tenancy for non-payment of rent in Toronto.
Yassin v Smith
Pickering tenant faces potential eviction after dispute over rent increase and arrears
Hazelview Property Services Inc. v Fatemi
Toronto tenant evicted for non-payment of rent, owes $8,938.24 to landlord.
Goklani v Cannata
Toronto tenants' maintenance dispute against landlord dismissed by LTB
Jeff v Ferguson
Woodstock landlords awarded $35,186 in rent arrears, tenants face eviction for non-payment.
Oxford Properties Group v Benjamin
Tenant ordered to pay $22,461.70 for flood damage with conditional tenancy preservation
Sufi Properties Ltd v Nieman
Tenants ordered to pay $16,866 in rent arrears to Former Landlord after complex dispute.