Landlord and Tenant Dispute Over Rent Increase Heads to Review Hearing: McNinch v Arlt 2024
Tenant challenges rent increase in Gananoque, prompting LTB review hearing and stay of original order
Summarized by RentZenLast updated: August 6, 2024
Case Summary
95 Tanner Street, Gananoque, ON K7G2P3
Dispute resolved in
agreement
Balance Owed
-
Dispute Categories
Agree with the ruling?
Timeline
Application Date
Dec 2022
Hearing Date
Feb 2024
Order Date
Feb 8, 2024
Dispute Summary
The Tenant requested a review of the order LTB-L-051948-22 issued on January 18, 2024, alleging that the order contains a serious error. The Tenant also requested a stay of the order until the review is resolved. The key issue to be determined is whether it was a serious error to find that the rent lawfully increased to $986.00 on January 1, 2023.
Determinations
- Tenant alleges order contains serious error
- Order stayed to preserve Tenant's rights until review is resolved
- Issue to be determined is whether rent increase to $986 on Jan 1, 2023 was a serious error
- Review hearing to be scheduled to determine if review request should be granted or denied
- If review granted, new hearing will be held on merits of original application
- Failure to attend review hearing may result in costs against Tenant
Decision Summary
The order LTB-L-051948-22 issued on January 18, 2024 is stayed until otherwise ordered. A review hearing will be scheduled to determine whether the Tenant's request to review the order should be granted or denied. If the review is granted, a new hearing will be held on the merits of the original application.
Adjudicator Details
LTB Member
Total Orders
929
Landlord Favorable
92.5%
Tenant Favorable
4.1%
Mutual Agreement
3.4%
Need assistance from an expert?
Sponsored
Financial Details
Lawful Rent
$986
Source
Similar Cases
Click to switch between case outcomes
Sripathy v Chilvers
Waterdown landlords regain possession of rental unit for personal use, tenant must vacate by January 31, 2025.
Singh v Gray
LTB upholds consent order terminating tenancy for non-payment of rent in Toronto.
Yassin v Smith
Pickering tenant faces potential eviction after dispute over rent increase and arrears
Hazelview Property Services Inc. v Fatemi
Toronto tenant evicted for non-payment of rent, owes $8,938.24 to landlord.
Sripathy v Chilvers
Waterdown landlords regain possession of rental unit for personal use, tenant must vacate by January 31, 2025.
Singh v Gray
LTB upholds consent order terminating tenancy for non-payment of rent in Toronto.
Yassin v Smith
Pickering tenant faces potential eviction after dispute over rent increase and arrears
Hazelview Property Services Inc. v Fatemi
Toronto tenant evicted for non-payment of rent, owes $8,938.24 to landlord.
Sripathy v Chilvers
Waterdown landlords regain possession of rental unit for personal use, tenant must vacate by January 31, 2025.
Singh v Gray
LTB upholds consent order terminating tenancy for non-payment of rent in Toronto.
Yassin v Smith
Pickering tenant faces potential eviction after dispute over rent increase and arrears
Hazelview Property Services Inc. v Fatemi
Toronto tenant evicted for non-payment of rent, owes $8,938.24 to landlord.
Sripathy v Chilvers
Waterdown landlords regain possession of rental unit for personal use, tenant must vacate by January 31, 2025.
Singh v Gray
LTB upholds consent order terminating tenancy for non-payment of rent in Toronto.
Yassin v Smith
Pickering tenant faces potential eviction after dispute over rent increase and arrears
Hazelview Property Services Inc. v Fatemi
Toronto tenant evicted for non-payment of rent, owes $8,938.24 to landlord.
Goklani v Cannata
Toronto tenants' maintenance dispute against landlord dismissed by LTB
Jeff v Ferguson
Woodstock landlords awarded $35,186 in rent arrears, tenants face eviction for non-payment.
Oxford Properties Group v Benjamin
Tenant ordered to pay $22,461.70 for flood damage with conditional tenancy preservation
Sufi Properties Ltd v Nieman
Tenants ordered to pay $16,866 in rent arrears to Former Landlord after complex dispute.