Landlord and Tenant Reach Agreement in Substantial Interference Case: Lopes v Cababaan 2023
Landlord and tenant agree to terminate Toronto tenancy due to substantial interference
Summarized by RentZenLast updated: July 22, 2024
Case Summary
Unit ****, 2115 Gerrard St E, Toronto, ON M4E2C2
Dispute resolved in
agreement
Balance Owed to Landlord
$186
Dispute Categories
Agree with the ruling?
Timeline
Application Date
Dec 2022
Hearing Date
Mar 2023
Order Date
Mar 24, 2023
Tenancy End Date
Mar 2023
Dispute Summary
Landlord applied for an order to terminate the tenancy and evict Tenants due to substantial interference with the reasonable enjoyment or lawful right, privilege or interest of the Landlord or another tenant. The parties agreed to terminate the tenancy effective March 31, 2023.
Determinations
- Landlord entitled to reimbursement of application filing costs
- Monthly rent is $827.41
- Parties agree to final, non-voidable termination of tenancy effective March 31, 2023
- Tenant to leave all keys on kitchen counter and leave rental unit door unlocked upon vacating
- Tenant, David Faed, is deceased as of December 2022 and will be removed as a party to the application
Decision Summary
The tenancy between the Landlord and the Tenant is terminated effective March 31, 2023. The Tenant must vacate the rental unit on or before March 31, 2023. If the unit is not vacated on or before March 31, 2023, the Landlord may file this order with the Court Enforcement Office (Sheriff) so that the eviction may be enforced. The Tenant shall pay the Landlord $186.00 for the cost of filing the application on or before March 24, 2023. If the Tenant does not pay the full amount owing on or before March 24, 2023, the Tenant will start to owe interest at 5.00% annually on the balance outstanding. If the Tenant does not vacate the rental unit on or before March 31, 2023, the Tenant shall also pay the Landlord compensation of $27.20 per day for the use of the unit starting April 1, 2023 until the date the Tenant moves out of the rental unit.
Adjudicator Details
LTB Member
Total Orders
15
Landlord Favorable
60.0%
Tenant Favorable
0.0%
Mutual Agreement
40.0%
Need assistance from an expert?
Sponsored
Financial Details
Lawful Rent
$827
Application Fee
$186
Total Owing
$186 (Owed to Landlord)
Source
Similar Cases
Click to switch between case outcomes
Sripathy v Chilvers
Waterdown landlords regain possession of rental unit for personal use, tenant must vacate by January 31, 2025.
Singh v Gray
LTB upholds consent order terminating tenancy for non-payment of rent in Toronto.
Yassin v Smith
Pickering tenant faces potential eviction after dispute over rent increase and arrears
Hazelview Property Services Inc. v Fatemi
Toronto tenant evicted for non-payment of rent, owes $8,938.24 to landlord.
Sripathy v Chilvers
Waterdown landlords regain possession of rental unit for personal use, tenant must vacate by January 31, 2025.
Singh v Gray
LTB upholds consent order terminating tenancy for non-payment of rent in Toronto.
Yassin v Smith
Pickering tenant faces potential eviction after dispute over rent increase and arrears
Hazelview Property Services Inc. v Fatemi
Toronto tenant evicted for non-payment of rent, owes $8,938.24 to landlord.
Sripathy v Chilvers
Waterdown landlords regain possession of rental unit for personal use, tenant must vacate by January 31, 2025.
Singh v Gray
LTB upholds consent order terminating tenancy for non-payment of rent in Toronto.
Yassin v Smith
Pickering tenant faces potential eviction after dispute over rent increase and arrears
Hazelview Property Services Inc. v Fatemi
Toronto tenant evicted for non-payment of rent, owes $8,938.24 to landlord.
Sripathy v Chilvers
Waterdown landlords regain possession of rental unit for personal use, tenant must vacate by January 31, 2025.
Singh v Gray
LTB upholds consent order terminating tenancy for non-payment of rent in Toronto.
Yassin v Smith
Pickering tenant faces potential eviction after dispute over rent increase and arrears
Hazelview Property Services Inc. v Fatemi
Toronto tenant evicted for non-payment of rent, owes $8,938.24 to landlord.
Goklani v Cannata
Toronto tenants' maintenance dispute against landlord dismissed by LTB
Jeff v Ferguson
Woodstock landlords awarded $35,186 in rent arrears, tenants face eviction for non-payment.
Oxford Properties Group v Benjamin
Tenant ordered to pay $22,461.70 for flood damage with conditional tenancy preservation
Sufi Properties Ltd v Nieman
Tenants ordered to pay $16,866 in rent arrears to Former Landlord after complex dispute.