Loft Community Services v Mendez: Landlord-Tenant Dispute Resolution
Landlord and tenant reach agreement to terminate tenancy due to substantial interference in Toronto
Summarized by RentZenLast updated: July 26, 2024
Case Summary
Unit ****, 26 Betty Nagel Street, Toronto, ON M9M0E2
Dispute resolved in
agreement
Balance Owed to Landlord
$191
Dispute Categories
Agree with the ruling?
Timeline
Hearing Date
Jan 2021
Order Date
Jan 18, 2021
Tenancy End Date
Apr 2021
Dispute Summary
Landlord applied for an order to terminate the tenancy and evict Tenant due to substantial interference with the reasonable enjoyment or lawful right, privilege or interest of the Landlord or another tenant. The Landlord also claimed compensation for each day the Tenant remained in the unit after the termination date.
Determinations
- Parties have authority to settle the application and understand the consequences of their consent
- Landlord agreed to make reasonable efforts to help the Tenant find suitable accommodation
- Tenant agreed to cooperate with the Landlord's efforts
- Landlord agreed to approach the owner to allow the Tenant to use the on-site laundry facilities
Decision Summary
The tenancy between the Landlord and the Tenant is terminated. The Tenant must move out of the rental unit on or before April 30, 2021. If the rental unit is not vacated by that date, the Landlord may file the order with the Court Enforcement Office (Sheriff) for enforcement. The Tenant may vacate the rental unit earlier than April 30, 2021 without penalty by giving the Landlord 10-days' notice. The Tenant shall owe the Landlord $16.34 for each day she remains in the rental unit after April 30, 2021 until the day she vacates. The Landlord shall waive the $175.00 application filing fee on the condition the Tenant vacates the rental unit on or before April 30, 2021.
Adjudicator Details
LTB Member
Total Orders
5
Landlord Favorable
0.0%
Tenant Favorable
0.0%
Mutual Agreement
100.0%
Need assistance from an expert?
Sponsored
Financial Details
Application Fee
$175
Other Owed Amount
$16
Compensation for each day the Tenant remains in the unit after April 30, 2021
Total Owing
$191 (Owed to Landlord)
Source
Similar Cases
Click to switch between case outcomes
Sripathy v Chilvers
Waterdown landlords regain possession of rental unit for personal use, tenant must vacate by January 31, 2025.
Singh v Gray
LTB upholds consent order terminating tenancy for non-payment of rent in Toronto.
Yassin v Smith
Pickering tenant faces potential eviction after dispute over rent increase and arrears
Hazelview Property Services Inc. v Fatemi
Toronto tenant evicted for non-payment of rent, owes $8,938.24 to landlord.
Sripathy v Chilvers
Waterdown landlords regain possession of rental unit for personal use, tenant must vacate by January 31, 2025.
Singh v Gray
LTB upholds consent order terminating tenancy for non-payment of rent in Toronto.
Yassin v Smith
Pickering tenant faces potential eviction after dispute over rent increase and arrears
Hazelview Property Services Inc. v Fatemi
Toronto tenant evicted for non-payment of rent, owes $8,938.24 to landlord.
Sripathy v Chilvers
Waterdown landlords regain possession of rental unit for personal use, tenant must vacate by January 31, 2025.
Singh v Gray
LTB upholds consent order terminating tenancy for non-payment of rent in Toronto.
Yassin v Smith
Pickering tenant faces potential eviction after dispute over rent increase and arrears
Hazelview Property Services Inc. v Fatemi
Toronto tenant evicted for non-payment of rent, owes $8,938.24 to landlord.
Sripathy v Chilvers
Waterdown landlords regain possession of rental unit for personal use, tenant must vacate by January 31, 2025.
Singh v Gray
LTB upholds consent order terminating tenancy for non-payment of rent in Toronto.
Yassin v Smith
Pickering tenant faces potential eviction after dispute over rent increase and arrears
Hazelview Property Services Inc. v Fatemi
Toronto tenant evicted for non-payment of rent, owes $8,938.24 to landlord.
Goklani v Cannata
Toronto tenants' maintenance dispute against landlord dismissed by LTB
Jeff v Ferguson
Woodstock landlords awarded $35,186 in rent arrears, tenants face eviction for non-payment.
Oxford Properties Group v Benjamin
Tenant ordered to pay $22,461.70 for flood damage with conditional tenancy preservation
Sufi Properties Ltd v Nieman
Tenants ordered to pay $16,866 in rent arrears to Former Landlord after complex dispute.