Landlord Wins Partial Victory in Rent Dispute: Kingston & Frontenac Housing Corporation v Lapointe
Tenant ordered to pay landlord's application fees, but tenancy not terminated in Kingston rent dispute
Summarized by RentZenLast updated: July 26, 2024
Case Summary
Unit ****, 300 Conacher Drive, Kingston, ON K7K5T6
Decision in favor of
landlord
Balance Owed to Landlord
$186
Dispute Categories
Notices Sent
Agree with the ruling?
Timeline
Application Date
Sep 2020
Hearing Date
Mar 2021
Order Date
Mar 30, 2021
Dispute Summary
Landlord applied for an order to terminate the tenancy and evict Tenant due to failure to pay rent. The Tenant had paid all arrears for the period ending March 31, 2021 after the application was filed, so the order was limited to costs only and not eviction.
Determinations
- Tenant has not paid rent from August 1, 2020 to September 30, 2020
- Tenant is in possession of the rental unit
- Tenant paid all arrears for the period ending March 31, 2021 after the application was filed
- Only the Landlord's cost of filing the application is outstanding
Case Study
The Tenant was ordered to pay the Landlord's cost of filing the application in installments, and if the Tenant fails to make one of the payments, the balance outstanding will come due and interest will start to accrue.
Decision Summary
The Tenant shall pay the Landlord's cost of filing the application in installments. If the Tenant fails to make one of the payments, the balance outstanding will come due and interest will start to accrue.
Adjudicator Details
LTB Member
Total Orders
721
Landlord Favorable
93.2%
Tenant Favorable
4.4%
Mutual Agreement
2.4%
Need assistance from an expert?
Sponsored
Financial Details
Application Fee
$186
Total Owing
$186 (Owed to Landlord)
Source
Similar Cases
Click to switch between case outcomes
Sripathy v Chilvers
Waterdown landlords regain possession of rental unit for personal use, tenant must vacate by January 31, 2025.
Singh v Gray
LTB upholds consent order terminating tenancy for non-payment of rent in Toronto.
Yassin v Smith
Pickering tenant faces potential eviction after dispute over rent increase and arrears
Hazelview Property Services Inc. v Fatemi
Toronto tenant evicted for non-payment of rent, owes $8,938.24 to landlord.
Sripathy v Chilvers
Waterdown landlords regain possession of rental unit for personal use, tenant must vacate by January 31, 2025.
Singh v Gray
LTB upholds consent order terminating tenancy for non-payment of rent in Toronto.
Yassin v Smith
Pickering tenant faces potential eviction after dispute over rent increase and arrears
Hazelview Property Services Inc. v Fatemi
Toronto tenant evicted for non-payment of rent, owes $8,938.24 to landlord.
Sripathy v Chilvers
Waterdown landlords regain possession of rental unit for personal use, tenant must vacate by January 31, 2025.
Singh v Gray
LTB upholds consent order terminating tenancy for non-payment of rent in Toronto.
Yassin v Smith
Pickering tenant faces potential eviction after dispute over rent increase and arrears
Hazelview Property Services Inc. v Fatemi
Toronto tenant evicted for non-payment of rent, owes $8,938.24 to landlord.
Sripathy v Chilvers
Waterdown landlords regain possession of rental unit for personal use, tenant must vacate by January 31, 2025.
Singh v Gray
LTB upholds consent order terminating tenancy for non-payment of rent in Toronto.
Yassin v Smith
Pickering tenant faces potential eviction after dispute over rent increase and arrears
Hazelview Property Services Inc. v Fatemi
Toronto tenant evicted for non-payment of rent, owes $8,938.24 to landlord.
Goklani v Cannata
Toronto tenants' maintenance dispute against landlord dismissed by LTB
Jeff v Ferguson
Woodstock landlords awarded $35,186 in rent arrears, tenants face eviction for non-payment.
Oxford Properties Group v Benjamin
Tenant ordered to pay $22,461.70 for flood damage with conditional tenancy preservation
Sufi Properties Ltd v Nieman
Tenants ordered to pay $16,866 in rent arrears to Former Landlord after complex dispute.