Landlord-Tenant Dispute Adjourned Due to Technical Issues: Khan v Koller 2024
LTB adjourns rent dispute case after tenant experiences technical issues logging in to hearing
Summarized by RentZenLast updated: August 6, 2024
Case Summary
Unit ****, 1636 Hickory Rd, Windsor, ON N8Y3T3
Dispute resolved in
agreement
Balance Owed
-
Dispute Categories
Notices Sent
Agree with the ruling?
Timeline
Application Date
Jan 2023
Hearing Date
Feb 2024
Order Date
Feb 16, 2024
Dispute Summary
Landlord applied for an order to terminate the tenancy and evict Tenant due to failure to pay rent.
Determinations
- Tenant requested adjournment due to technical issues
- Adjournment granted to allow Tenant to participate
- Parties to exchange evidence by March 1, 2024
- Tenant must pay ongoing rent until matter resolved
Case Study
The Tenant requested an adjournment because the matter was already heard and the Tenant was unable to attend due to technical issues. The adjournment was granted to allow the Tenant to participate.
Arguments and Actions
Tenant
Actions
Tenant testified that she had technical issues and could not login in, and had attempted to login since 8:30AM.
Decision Summary
The hearing was adjourned to a date to be scheduled by the LTB, with the Tenant required to pay ongoing rent until the matter is resolved.
Adjudicator Details
LTB Member
Total Orders
73
Landlord Favorable
87.7%
Tenant Favorable
1.4%
Mutual Agreement
11.0%
Need assistance from an expert?
Sponsored
Source
Similar Cases
Click to switch between case outcomes
Sripathy v Chilvers
Waterdown landlords regain possession of rental unit for personal use, tenant must vacate by January 31, 2025.
Singh v Gray
LTB upholds consent order terminating tenancy for non-payment of rent in Toronto.
Yassin v Smith
Pickering tenant faces potential eviction after dispute over rent increase and arrears
Hazelview Property Services Inc. v Fatemi
Toronto tenant evicted for non-payment of rent, owes $8,938.24 to landlord.
Sripathy v Chilvers
Waterdown landlords regain possession of rental unit for personal use, tenant must vacate by January 31, 2025.
Singh v Gray
LTB upholds consent order terminating tenancy for non-payment of rent in Toronto.
Yassin v Smith
Pickering tenant faces potential eviction after dispute over rent increase and arrears
Hazelview Property Services Inc. v Fatemi
Toronto tenant evicted for non-payment of rent, owes $8,938.24 to landlord.
Sripathy v Chilvers
Waterdown landlords regain possession of rental unit for personal use, tenant must vacate by January 31, 2025.
Singh v Gray
LTB upholds consent order terminating tenancy for non-payment of rent in Toronto.
Yassin v Smith
Pickering tenant faces potential eviction after dispute over rent increase and arrears
Hazelview Property Services Inc. v Fatemi
Toronto tenant evicted for non-payment of rent, owes $8,938.24 to landlord.
Sripathy v Chilvers
Waterdown landlords regain possession of rental unit for personal use, tenant must vacate by January 31, 2025.
Singh v Gray
LTB upholds consent order terminating tenancy for non-payment of rent in Toronto.
Yassin v Smith
Pickering tenant faces potential eviction after dispute over rent increase and arrears
Hazelview Property Services Inc. v Fatemi
Toronto tenant evicted for non-payment of rent, owes $8,938.24 to landlord.
Goklani v Cannata
Toronto tenants' maintenance dispute against landlord dismissed by LTB
Jeff v Ferguson
Woodstock landlords awarded $35,186 in rent arrears, tenants face eviction for non-payment.
Oxford Properties Group v Benjamin
Tenant ordered to pay $22,461.70 for flood damage with conditional tenancy preservation
Sufi Properties Ltd v Nieman
Tenants ordered to pay $16,866 in rent arrears to Former Landlord after complex dispute.