GLOBAL LEGAL SERVICES v KHAN: Tenant's Motion to Set Aside Termination Denied
LTB Upholds Tenancy Termination: GLOBAL LEGAL SERVICES v KHAN
Summarized by RentZenLast updated: July 22, 2024
Case Summary
Unit ****, 260 Sackville Street, Toronto, ON M5A0B3
Decision in favor of
landlord
Balance Owed
-
Dispute Categories
Agree with the ruling?
Timeline
Hearing Date
Jan 2023
Order Date
Jan 6, 2023
Dispute Summary
Landlord applied for an order to terminate the tenancy and evict Tenant because the Tenant entered into an agreement to terminate the tenancy. The Landlord's application was resolved by order LTB-L-071400-22, issued on December 2, 2022, without a hearing. The Tenant filed a motion to set aside this order, which was heard on January 4, 2023.
Determinations
- Previous order LTB-L-071400-22 was issued without a hearing
- Previous order remains unchanged
- Stay of previous order lifted on February 1, 2023
- Tenant entered into an agreement to terminate tenancy
- Tenant's motion to set aside previous order was denied
Case Study
The Tenant's motion to set aside the previous order was denied, indicating that the original order terminating the tenancy was valid. The Tenant could have potentially turned the decision around by providing compelling evidence or legal arguments during the motion hearing to justify setting aside the previous order.
Arguments and Actions
Landlord
Arguments
Landlord likely argued for the validity of the termination agreement and the appropriateness of the original order.
Actions
Landlord applied for termination based on an agreement with the Tenant and successfully defended against the Tenant's motion to set aside the order.
Tenant
Arguments
Tenant attempted to challenge the validity or circumstances of the agreement to terminate the tenancy through a motion to set aside the previous order.
Actions
Tenant entered into an agreement to terminate the tenancy but later filed a motion to set aside the order based on that agreement.
Decision Summary
The Tenant's motion to set aside the previous order (LTB-L-071400-22) was denied. The stay on the previous order is lifted on February 1, 2023, and the original order remains unchanged. This effectively upholds the termination of the tenancy as per the agreement entered into by the Tenant.
Adjudicator Details
LTB Member
Total Orders
775
Landlord Favorable
77.2%
Tenant Favorable
10.3%
Mutual Agreement
12.5%
Need assistance from an expert?
Sponsored
Financial Details
Source
Similar Cases
Click to switch between case outcomes
Sripathy v Chilvers
Waterdown landlords regain possession of rental unit for personal use, tenant must vacate by January 31, 2025.
Singh v Gray
LTB upholds consent order terminating tenancy for non-payment of rent in Toronto.
Yassin v Smith
Pickering tenant faces potential eviction after dispute over rent increase and arrears
Hazelview Property Services Inc. v Fatemi
Toronto tenant evicted for non-payment of rent, owes $8,938.24 to landlord.
Sripathy v Chilvers
Waterdown landlords regain possession of rental unit for personal use, tenant must vacate by January 31, 2025.
Singh v Gray
LTB upholds consent order terminating tenancy for non-payment of rent in Toronto.
Yassin v Smith
Pickering tenant faces potential eviction after dispute over rent increase and arrears
Hazelview Property Services Inc. v Fatemi
Toronto tenant evicted for non-payment of rent, owes $8,938.24 to landlord.
Sripathy v Chilvers
Waterdown landlords regain possession of rental unit for personal use, tenant must vacate by January 31, 2025.
Singh v Gray
LTB upholds consent order terminating tenancy for non-payment of rent in Toronto.
Yassin v Smith
Pickering tenant faces potential eviction after dispute over rent increase and arrears
Hazelview Property Services Inc. v Fatemi
Toronto tenant evicted for non-payment of rent, owes $8,938.24 to landlord.
Sripathy v Chilvers
Waterdown landlords regain possession of rental unit for personal use, tenant must vacate by January 31, 2025.
Singh v Gray
LTB upholds consent order terminating tenancy for non-payment of rent in Toronto.
Yassin v Smith
Pickering tenant faces potential eviction after dispute over rent increase and arrears
Hazelview Property Services Inc. v Fatemi
Toronto tenant evicted for non-payment of rent, owes $8,938.24 to landlord.
Goklani v Cannata
Toronto tenants' maintenance dispute against landlord dismissed by LTB
Jeff v Ferguson
Woodstock landlords awarded $35,186 in rent arrears, tenants face eviction for non-payment.
Oxford Properties Group v Benjamin
Tenant ordered to pay $22,461.70 for flood damage with conditional tenancy preservation
Sufi Properties Ltd v Nieman
Tenants ordered to pay $16,866 in rent arrears to Former Landlord after complex dispute.