Elm Place Inc. v Kelley

Last updated: July 22, 2024

Order

Ordered by Frank Ebner,Tribunals Ontario  under Section 69, Residential Tenancies Act 2006

Order Date: July 25, 2022
*** Don Mills Rd, East York, ON M3C1R9
Contested Dispute

Decision in favor of

Landlord

Dispute Categories

Notices Sent

Non-payment of rent (N4)
ContentionModerate

Agree with the ruling?

Citation: Elm Place Inc. v Kelley, 2022 ONLTB 1883

File Number: LTB-L-017152-22

Timeline

Application Date

Mar 2022

3 months

Hearing Date

Jul 2022

18 days

Order Date

Jul 25, 2022

Decision

The tenant is ordered to pay the landlord $1,783.88, which includes $1,597.88 in rent arrears up to July 31, 2022 and $186.00 for the landlord's application filing costs. The tenant shall also pay the new monthly rent of $2,399.51 on the first of each month from August 1, 2022 to September 30, 2022, or until the arrears are paid in full, whichever is earlier. If the tenant fails to make any of these payments, the landlord may apply to the LTB for an order terminating the tenancy and evicting the tenant.

Unlock Order Content

Dispute

Landlord applied for an order to terminate the tenancy and evict Tenant due to failure to pay rent. The application was filed after serving a valid Notice to End Tenancy Early for Non-payment of Rent (N4 Notice), which the tenant did not void by paying the arrears. The tenant was still in possession of the rental unit on the hearing date.

Unlock Order Content

Determinations

  • Landlord incurred $186 in application filing costs
  • Landlord served valid N4 Notice
  • Lawful rent increased to $2399.51 effective May 1, 2022
  • Lawful rent was $2299.51 for March and April 2022
  • Tenant did not void notice by paying arrears
  • Tenant in possession on application date
  • Unlock Order Content

Landlord's Arguments

Arguments

Tenant failed to take responsibility for paying rent and never actively communicated with the landlord when offered a payment plan.

Unlock Order Content

Actions and Evidence

Landlord made several attempts to establish a payment plan with the tenant, but the tenant never responded.

Unlock Order Content

Tenant's Arguments

Arguments

Tenant would like to retain the tenancy, is financially capable of paying the rent arrears, and will pay any rent arrears ordered by the Board.

Unlock Order Content

Actions and Evidence

Tenant acknowledged having rent arrears but was unaware of the exact total. Tenant believed the rent arrears were the responsibility of the housing authority, not her own.

Unlock Order Content

Need assistance from an expert?

Professional business person

Reach Landlords & Tenants

Advertise your legal or rental services to our audience

Sponsored

Similar Cases

Click to switch between order outcomes

Shakori v Frolov

Contested Dispute
Landlord Wins
January 22, 2026
Etobicoke

Etobicoke landlord wins $41,000 judgment after Board rules a $1.42 error does not invalidate an eviction notice.

Tenant Aggravating Factor
Testimony Contested
ContentionExtreme

ZHANG v CALVILLO

Contested Dispute
Landlord Wins

LTB denies tenants' review request after finding no error in the original eviction order despite tenants' claims of hardship and rent waivers.

Tenant Aggravating Factor
Testimony Contested
Section 82 Issues Raised and Denied
ContentionHigh

MA v MACHADO

Contested Dispute
Landlord Wins
January 21, 2026
North York

Landlord granted eviction for $22,341 in arrears, but LTB delays move-out date due to tenant's recent heart surgery.

Eviction Relief Granted
ContentionLow

Nan v Christie

Contested Dispute
Landlord Wins
January 21, 2026
Markham

Markham tenants granted a chance to stay in their home by paying over $13,000 in arrears under a consent agreement.

Eviction Relief Granted
ContentionLow

Shakori v Frolov

Contested Dispute
Landlord Wins
January 22, 2026
Etobicoke

Etobicoke landlord wins $41,000 judgment after Board rules a $1.42 error does not invalidate an eviction notice.

Tenant Aggravating Factor
Testimony Contested
ContentionExtreme

ZHANG v CALVILLO

Contested Dispute
Landlord Wins

LTB denies tenants' review request after finding no error in the original eviction order despite tenants' claims of hardship and rent waivers.

Tenant Aggravating Factor
Testimony Contested
Section 82 Issues Raised and Denied
ContentionHigh

MA v MACHADO

Contested Dispute
Landlord Wins
January 21, 2026
North York

Landlord granted eviction for $22,341 in arrears, but LTB delays move-out date due to tenant's recent heart surgery.

Eviction Relief Granted
ContentionLow

Nan v Christie

Contested Dispute
Landlord Wins
January 21, 2026
Markham

Markham tenants granted a chance to stay in their home by paying over $13,000 in arrears under a consent agreement.

Eviction Relief Granted
ContentionLow

Unlock More Similar Orders

Access our complete database of similar cases to make more informed decisions and better understand LTB rulings.

Compare outcomes of similar cases to assess your position

Analyze patterns in LTB decisions for your case type

Build stronger arguments with real case references

Share:

Latest Insights from Our Blog

Stay informed with expert analysis on rental law, tenant rights, and LTB decisions

Need Legal Help? We've Got You Covered

Whether you need to find qualified legal professionals or post your specific legal needs to get competitive quotes, our platform connects you with the right help.

Find Legal Professionals

Browse our directory of verified paralegals and lawyers specializing in Ontario rental law and LTB matters.

Browse Professionals

Post Your Legal Needs

Describe your legal situation and receive competitive quotes from qualified professionals in our marketplace.

Post a Bounty

Join thousands of Ontarians who have found legal help through our platform