Landlords and Tenants Reach Agreement in Brampton Dispute: Coates v Parke 2021
Landlords and tenants in Brampton reach agreement to terminate tenancy due to substantial interference
Summarized by RentZenLast updated: August 6, 2024
Case Summary
Unit ****, 24 Massey Street, Brampton, ON L6S2W1
Dispute resolved in
agreement
Balance Owed
-
Dispute Categories
Agree with the ruling?
Timeline
Hearing Date
Nov 2021
Order Date
Nov 15, 2021
Tenancy End Date
Jan 2022
Dispute Summary
Landlords applied for an order to terminate the tenancy and evict Tenants because they, another occupant of the rental unit or someone they permitted in the residential complex have substantially interfered with the reasonable enjoyment or lawful right, privilege or interest of the Landlords in a residential complex that has three or fewer residential units. The Landlords also claimed compensation for each day the Tenants remained in the unit after the termination date.
Determinations
- Tenancy terminated
- Tenants must move out by 2022-01-31
- Last month's rent deposit applied to January 2022 rent
- Landlord may file order with Sheriff for eviction if unit not vacated by 2022-01-31
Decision Summary
The tenancy between the Landlord and the Tenants is terminated. The Tenants must move out of the rental unit on or before January 31, 2022. The last month's rent deposit shall be applied in full satisfaction of January 2022 rent. If the unit is not vacated on or before January 31, 2022, then starting February 1, 2022, the Landlord may file this order with the Court Enforcement Office (Sheriff) so that the eviction may be enforced.
Adjudicator Details
LTB Member
Total Orders
8
Landlord Favorable
37.5%
Tenant Favorable
0.0%
Mutual Agreement
62.5%
Need assistance from an expert?
Sponsored
Source
Similar Cases
Click to switch between case outcomes
Sripathy v Chilvers
Waterdown landlords regain possession of rental unit for personal use, tenant must vacate by January 31, 2025.
Singh v Gray
LTB upholds consent order terminating tenancy for non-payment of rent in Toronto.
Yassin v Smith
Pickering tenant faces potential eviction after dispute over rent increase and arrears
Hazelview Property Services Inc. v Fatemi
Toronto tenant evicted for non-payment of rent, owes $8,938.24 to landlord.
Sripathy v Chilvers
Waterdown landlords regain possession of rental unit for personal use, tenant must vacate by January 31, 2025.
Singh v Gray
LTB upholds consent order terminating tenancy for non-payment of rent in Toronto.
Yassin v Smith
Pickering tenant faces potential eviction after dispute over rent increase and arrears
Hazelview Property Services Inc. v Fatemi
Toronto tenant evicted for non-payment of rent, owes $8,938.24 to landlord.
Sripathy v Chilvers
Waterdown landlords regain possession of rental unit for personal use, tenant must vacate by January 31, 2025.
Singh v Gray
LTB upholds consent order terminating tenancy for non-payment of rent in Toronto.
Yassin v Smith
Pickering tenant faces potential eviction after dispute over rent increase and arrears
Hazelview Property Services Inc. v Fatemi
Toronto tenant evicted for non-payment of rent, owes $8,938.24 to landlord.
Sripathy v Chilvers
Waterdown landlords regain possession of rental unit for personal use, tenant must vacate by January 31, 2025.
Singh v Gray
LTB upholds consent order terminating tenancy for non-payment of rent in Toronto.
Yassin v Smith
Pickering tenant faces potential eviction after dispute over rent increase and arrears
Hazelview Property Services Inc. v Fatemi
Toronto tenant evicted for non-payment of rent, owes $8,938.24 to landlord.
Goklani v Cannata
Toronto tenants' maintenance dispute against landlord dismissed by LTB
Jeff v Ferguson
Woodstock landlords awarded $35,186 in rent arrears, tenants face eviction for non-payment.
Oxford Properties Group v Benjamin
Tenant ordered to pay $22,461.70 for flood damage with conditional tenancy preservation
Sufi Properties Ltd v Nieman
Tenants ordered to pay $16,866 in rent arrears to Former Landlord after complex dispute.