Landlord Wins Rent Arrears Case: 2679872 Ontario Limited v Rose 2024
Tenant ordered to pay $1672 for rent arrears after leaving rental unit without proper notice in Oshawa
Summarized by RentZenLast updated: November 14, 2024
Case Summary
Unit ****, 150 William St E, Oshawa, ON L1G1K6
Decision in favor of
landlord
Balance Owed to Landlord
$1,672
Dispute Categories
Subsections of RTA Quoted
Agree with the ruling?
Timeline
Application Date (Estimate)
Mar 2023
Tenancy End Date
May 2023
Hearing Date
Jul 2024
Order Date
Aug 26, 2024
We estimate Application Date using rent arrears. Tenancy ended before hearing.
Dispute Summary
Landlord applied for an order requiring the Former Tenant to pay rent arrears, daily compensation, and out-of-pocket costs for damages and substantial interference with reasonable enjoyment of the residential complex.
Determinations
- Tenant vacated rental unit on May 31, 2023
- Tenant did not provide 60 days notice to vacate
- Landlord not entitled to full arrears claim
- No substantial interference proven
- No damages claim substantiated
Arguments and Actions
Landlord
Arguments
Sought arrears and damages for unit repairs
Actions
Claimed tenant left AC on causing water damage, but did not provide receipts for repairs
Tenant
Arguments
Complaints against other tenants were valid reasons for vacating
Actions
Tenant claims she vacated due to substantial interference, but did not properly raise Section 82 issues
Procedural Errors
Did not provide 60 days notice to vacate
Decision Summary
The Former Tenant shall pay $1,672.00 to the Landlord by September 6, 2024, representing rent arrears up to June 30, 2023, less the last month's rent deposit and interest.
Adjudicator Details
LTB Member
Total Orders
89
Landlord Favorable
94.4%
Tenant Favorable
2.3%
Mutual Agreement
3.4%
Need assistance from an expert?
Sponsored
Financial Details
Lawful Rent
$1,486
Rent Arrears
$2,972
Application Fee
$186
Rent Deposit
$1,450
Deposit Interest
$36
Total Owing
$1,672 (Owed to Landlord)
Source
Similar Cases
Click to switch between case outcomes
Sripathy v Chilvers
Waterdown landlords regain possession of rental unit for personal use, tenant must vacate by January 31, 2025.
Singh v Gray
LTB upholds consent order terminating tenancy for non-payment of rent in Toronto.
Yassin v Smith
Pickering tenant faces potential eviction after dispute over rent increase and arrears
Hazelview Property Services Inc. v Fatemi
Toronto tenant evicted for non-payment of rent, owes $8,938.24 to landlord.
Sripathy v Chilvers
Waterdown landlords regain possession of rental unit for personal use, tenant must vacate by January 31, 2025.
Singh v Gray
LTB upholds consent order terminating tenancy for non-payment of rent in Toronto.
Yassin v Smith
Pickering tenant faces potential eviction after dispute over rent increase and arrears
Hazelview Property Services Inc. v Fatemi
Toronto tenant evicted for non-payment of rent, owes $8,938.24 to landlord.
Sripathy v Chilvers
Waterdown landlords regain possession of rental unit for personal use, tenant must vacate by January 31, 2025.
Singh v Gray
LTB upholds consent order terminating tenancy for non-payment of rent in Toronto.
Yassin v Smith
Pickering tenant faces potential eviction after dispute over rent increase and arrears
Hazelview Property Services Inc. v Fatemi
Toronto tenant evicted for non-payment of rent, owes $8,938.24 to landlord.
Sripathy v Chilvers
Waterdown landlords regain possession of rental unit for personal use, tenant must vacate by January 31, 2025.
Singh v Gray
LTB upholds consent order terminating tenancy for non-payment of rent in Toronto.
Yassin v Smith
Pickering tenant faces potential eviction after dispute over rent increase and arrears
Hazelview Property Services Inc. v Fatemi
Toronto tenant evicted for non-payment of rent, owes $8,938.24 to landlord.
Goklani v Cannata
Toronto tenants' maintenance dispute against landlord dismissed by LTB
Jeff v Ferguson
Woodstock landlords awarded $35,186 in rent arrears, tenants face eviction for non-payment.
Oxford Properties Group v Benjamin
Tenant ordered to pay $22,461.70 for flood damage with conditional tenancy preservation
Sufi Properties Ltd v Nieman
Tenants ordered to pay $16,866 in rent arrears to Former Landlord after complex dispute.