1093886 Ontario Incorporated v Saqib

Last updated: October 13, 2024

Order

Ordered by Tribunals Ontario  under Section 69, Residential Tenancies Act 2006

Order Date: February 26, 2024
Unit ***, 4975 Valley Way, Niagara Falls, ON L2E1W6
Uncontested Dispute

Decision in favor of

Landlord

Ordered Amount

-$4

to Tenant

Dispute Categories

Notices Sent

Non-payment of rent (N4)
ContentionLow

Agree with the ruling?

Citation: 1093886 Ontario Incorporated v Saqib, 2024 ONLTB 14348

File Number: LTB-L-076253-23

Timeline

Application Date (Estimate)

Dec 2023

1 months

Hearing Date

Jan 2024

28 days

Order Date

Feb 26, 2024

11 days

Tenancy End Date

Mar 2024

We estimate Application Date using rent arrears.

Decision

Unless the Tenant voids the order by paying $3,301 by February 29, 2024 or $4,801 by March 8, 2024, the tenancy will be terminated. If the Tenant does not pay, they must move out by March 8, 2024. The Landlord is authorized to deduct $49.32 per day for compensation for the use of the unit starting January 30, 2024 until the Tenant moves out.

Unlock Order Content

Dispute

Landlord applied for an order to terminate the tenancy and evict Tenants due to failure to pay rent. The application was filed after serving a valid Notice to End Tenancy Early for Non-payment of Rent (N4 Notice), which the tenants did not void by paying the arrears. The tenants were still in possession of the rental unit on the hearing date.

Unlock Order Content

Determinations

  • Landlord served valid N4 Notice
  • Tenants did not void notice by paying arrears
  • Tenants in possession on application date
  • Lawful rent is $1,500 due on 1st of each month
  • Tenant paid $4,950 since application filed
  • Rent arrears owing to hearing date are $1,600
  • Unlock Order Content

Landlord's Arguments

Tenant's Arguments

Need assistance from an expert?

Thirusenthuran Sivapatham

Thirusenthuran Sivapatham

Professional Paralegal Services

Scarborough

Sponsored

Financial Details

Lawful Rent

$1,500

Rent Arrears

$1,600

Application Fee

$201

Rent Deposit

$1,700

Deposit Interest

$35

Ordered Amount

-$4 (to Tenant)

Similar Cases

Click to switch between order outcomes

16127720 Canada Inc. v Stevens

Contested Dispute
Landlord Wins

Landlord granted eviction order against tenant who caused damage and safety issues at residential complex.

Eviction Relief Granted
ContentionHigh

MM Nominee Corp. v Oba

Contested Dispute
Landlord Wins
February 21, 2025
North York

Landlord wins non-payment case, but tenant granted conditional relief from eviction to repay $4,589.97 in arrears.

Eviction Relief Granted
Section 82 Issues Raised and Denied
ContentionModerate

PASTE PROPERTIES ONTARIO LTD v FLEURY

Contested Dispute
Landlord Wins
February 20, 2025
Bancroft
Review Order

LTB upholds eviction order against Bancroft tenant for breach of conditions, despite tenant's request for review.

ContentionModerate

Li v Lincoln

Contested Dispute
Landlord Wins
February 20, 2025
Toronto

Toronto tenant faces eviction for non-payment of $8,050 in rent, ordered to pay $7,674.86.

Eviction Relief Granted
Section 82 Issues Raised and Denied
ContentionHigh

16127720 Canada Inc. v Stevens

Contested Dispute
Landlord Wins

Landlord granted eviction order against tenant who caused damage and safety issues at residential complex.

Eviction Relief Granted
ContentionHigh

MM Nominee Corp. v Oba

Contested Dispute
Landlord Wins
February 21, 2025
North York

Landlord wins non-payment case, but tenant granted conditional relief from eviction to repay $4,589.97 in arrears.

Eviction Relief Granted
Section 82 Issues Raised and Denied
ContentionModerate

PASTE PROPERTIES ONTARIO LTD v FLEURY

Contested Dispute
Landlord Wins
February 20, 2025
Bancroft
Review Order

LTB upholds eviction order against Bancroft tenant for breach of conditions, despite tenant's request for review.

ContentionModerate

Li v Lincoln

Contested Dispute
Landlord Wins
February 20, 2025
Toronto

Toronto tenant faces eviction for non-payment of $8,050 in rent, ordered to pay $7,674.86.

Eviction Relief Granted
Section 82 Issues Raised and Denied
ContentionHigh

Unlock More Similar Orders

Access our complete database of similar cases to make more informed decisions and better understand LTB rulings.

Compare outcomes of similar cases to assess your position

Analyze patterns in LTB decisions for your case type

Build stronger arguments with real case references

Share: