Vladimir Nikitin
Landlord and Tenant Board (LTB) Adjudicator Past Decisions
Overview
658
166
26
8
Order OutcomesPRO
Eviction Relief Granted to Tenant 26 Orders since 2024PRO
Please subscribe v Please subscribe v Please subscribe v
Please subscribe to pro to view this content. Please subscribe to pro to view this content. Please subscribe to pro to view this content.
Please subscribe v Please subscribe v Please subscribe v
Reason for Relief
Please subscribe to pro to view this content. Please subscribe to pro to view this content. Please subscribe to pro to view this content.
Who Wins
LandlordPlease subscribe v Please subscribe v
Please subscribe to pro to view this content. Please subscribe to pro to view this content.
Please subscribe v Please subscribe v
Reason for Relief
Please subscribe to pro to view this content. Please subscribe to pro to view this content.
Who Wins
TenantPlease subscribe v Please subscribe v
Please subscribe to pro to view this content. Please subscribe to pro to view this content.
Please subscribe v Please subscribe v
Reason for Relief
Please subscribe to pro to view this content. Please subscribe to pro to view this content.
Who Wins
TenantPlease subscribe v Please subscribe v
Please subscribe to pro to view this content. Please subscribe to pro to view this content.
Please subscribe v Please subscribe v
Reason for Relief
Please subscribe to pro to view this content. Please subscribe to pro to view this content.
Who Wins
LandlordPlease subscribe v
Please subscribe to pro to view this content.
Unlock Full Access to Vladimir Nikitin's Decisions
Get a strategic advantage by understanding how they rule on similar cases.
Gain insights on how Vladimir Nikitin typically rules on cases like yours
Access a full decision history to boost your preparation and confidence
Quote past rulings to strengthen your argument
Lanlord's Notice Found Invalid 8 Orders since 2024PRO
Please subscribe v Please subscribe v Please subscribe v
Please subscribe to pro to view this content. Please subscribe to pro to view this content. Please subscribe to pro to view this content.
Please subscribe v Please subscribe v Please subscribe v
Reason for Relief
Please subscribe to pro to view this content. Please subscribe to pro to view this content. Please subscribe to pro to view this content.
Who Wins
LandlordPlease subscribe v Please subscribe v
Please subscribe to pro to view this content. Please subscribe to pro to view this content.
Please subscribe v Please subscribe v
Reason for Relief
Please subscribe to pro to view this content. Please subscribe to pro to view this content.
Who Wins
TenantPlease subscribe v Please subscribe v
Please subscribe to pro to view this content. Please subscribe to pro to view this content.
Please subscribe v Please subscribe v
Reason for Relief
Please subscribe to pro to view this content. Please subscribe to pro to view this content.
Who Wins
TenantPlease subscribe v Please subscribe v
Please subscribe to pro to view this content. Please subscribe to pro to view this content.
Please subscribe v Please subscribe v
Reason for Relief
Please subscribe to pro to view this content. Please subscribe to pro to view this content.
Who Wins
LandlordPlease subscribe v
Please subscribe to pro to view this content.
Unlock Full Access to Vladimir Nikitin's Decisions
Get a strategic advantage by understanding how they rule on similar cases.
Gain insights on how Vladimir Nikitin typically rules on cases like yours
Access a full decision history to boost your preparation and confidence
Quote past rulings to strengthen your argument
Contested Dispute by CategoryPRO
- Tenant Rights33
Landlord Win Rate: 39.39%
- Maintenance Issues28
Landlord Win Rate: 39.29%
- Illegal Entry22
Landlord Win Rate: 27.27%
- Personal Use21
Landlord Win Rate: 52.38%
- Tenant Agreed Termination21
Landlord Win Rate: 33.33%
- Breach Of Conditions20
Landlord Win Rate: 30%
Unlock Full Access to Vladimir Nikitin's Decisions
Get a strategic advantage by understanding how they rule on similar cases.
Gain insights on how Vladimir Nikitin typically rules on cases like yours
Access a full decision history to boost your preparation and confidence
Quote past rulings to strengthen your argument
Latest Orders
The Landlord and Tenant reached a settlement agreement regarding a maintenance application, with the Landlord agreeing to pay the Tenant $1,500.00.
The Tenant's maintenance application was dismissed as abandoned after the Tenant failed to attend the hearing.
The Board dismissed a Tenant's application after determining that the parties' relationship was a family arrangement rather than a residential tenancy.
The Landlord and Tenant reached a consent agreement regarding the return of property and payment of compensation to the Tenant.
Beanre/Ramirez v Issakova
The parties reached a consent order to resolve an application involving allegations of harassment and interference, resulting in the termination of the tenancy and a monetary payment to the Tenant.
Charlebois v Judd
The Landlord and Tenant reached a consent agreement regarding unit repairs, motel stay coverage, and rent reductions following an application regarding unit access and reasonable enjoyment.
The Landlord and Tenant reached a settlement agreement regarding a maintenance application, with the Landlord agreeing to pay the Tenant $1,500.00.
The Tenant's maintenance application was dismissed as abandoned after the Tenant failed to attend the hearing.
The Board dismissed a Tenant's application after determining that the parties' relationship was a family arrangement rather than a residential tenancy.
The Landlord and Tenant reached a consent agreement regarding the return of property and payment of compensation to the Tenant.
Beanre/Ramirez v Issakova
The parties reached a consent order to resolve an application involving allegations of harassment and interference, resulting in the termination of the tenancy and a monetary payment to the Tenant.
Charlebois v Judd
The Landlord and Tenant reached a consent agreement regarding unit repairs, motel stay coverage, and rent reductions following an application regarding unit access and reasonable enjoyment.
The Landlord and Tenant reached a settlement agreement regarding a maintenance application, with the Landlord agreeing to pay the Tenant $1,500.00.
The Tenant's maintenance application was dismissed as abandoned after the Tenant failed to attend the hearing.
The Board dismissed a Tenant's application after determining that the parties' relationship was a family arrangement rather than a residential tenancy.
The Landlord and Tenant reached a consent agreement regarding the return of property and payment of compensation to the Tenant.
Beanre/Ramirez v Issakova
The parties reached a consent order to resolve an application involving allegations of harassment and interference, resulting in the termination of the tenancy and a monetary payment to the Tenant.
Charlebois v Judd
The Landlord and Tenant reached a consent agreement regarding unit repairs, motel stay coverage, and rent reductions following an application regarding unit access and reasonable enjoyment.
The Landlord and Tenant reached a settlement agreement regarding a maintenance application, with the Landlord agreeing to pay the Tenant $1,500.00.
The Tenant's maintenance application was dismissed as abandoned after the Tenant failed to attend the hearing.
The Board dismissed a Tenant's application after determining that the parties' relationship was a family arrangement rather than a residential tenancy.
The Landlord and Tenant reached a consent agreement regarding the return of property and payment of compensation to the Tenant.
Beanre/Ramirez v Issakova
The parties reached a consent order to resolve an application involving allegations of harassment and interference, resulting in the termination of the tenancy and a monetary payment to the Tenant.
Charlebois v Judd
The Landlord and Tenant reached a consent agreement regarding unit repairs, motel stay coverage, and rent reductions following an application regarding unit access and reasonable enjoyment.
Unlock Full Access to Vladimir Nikitin's Decisions
Get a strategic advantage by understanding how they rule on similar cases.
Gain insights on how Vladimir Nikitin typically rules on cases like yours
Access a full decision history to boost your preparation and confidence
Quote past rulings to strengthen your argument
Latest Insights from Our Blog
Stay informed with expert analysis on rental law, tenant rights, and LTB decisions
The Evidence Game: How to Build a Winning Case at the LTB Through Proper Documentation and Witness Testimony
Master the art of evidence preparation and witness testimony at the Landlord and Tenant Board. Learn what types of evidence are accepted, how to avoid hearsay pitfalls, and strategies for presenting compelling cases.
The N12 Eviction Maze: Understanding Personal Use and Purchaser Requirements in Ontario
A comprehensive guide to N12 notices for personal use and purchaser requirements, including compensation obligations, good faith requirements, and common pitfalls that lead to dismissed applications.
Illegal Rent Increases in Ontario: Understanding Your Rights and Landlord Obligations
A comprehensive analysis of illegal rent increase cases at Ontario's LTB reveals common violations, tenant rights, and the significant financial consequences for landlords who fail to follow proper procedures.
Need Legal Help? We've Got You Covered
Whether you need to find qualified legal professionals or post your specific legal needs to get competitive quotes, our platform connects you with the right help.
Find Legal Professionals
Browse our directory of verified paralegals and lawyers specializing in Ontario rental law and LTB matters.
Browse ProfessionalsPost Your Legal Needs
Describe your legal situation and receive competitive quotes from qualified professionals in our marketplace.
Post a BountyJoin thousands of Ontarians who have found legal help through our platform