Peter Nicholson
Landlord and Tenant Board (LTB) Adjudicator Past Decisions
Overview
684
290
61
7
Order OutcomesPRO
Eviction Relief Granted to Tenant 61 Orders since 2024PRO
Please subscribe v
Please subscribe to pro to view this content.
Please subscribe v
Reason for Relief
Please subscribe to pro to view this content.
Who Wins
LandlordPlease subscribe v Please subscribe v Please subscribe v
Please subscribe to pro to view this content. Please subscribe to pro to view this content. Please subscribe to pro to view this content.
Please subscribe v Please subscribe v Please subscribe v
Reason for Relief
Please subscribe to pro to view this content. Please subscribe to pro to view this content. Please subscribe to pro to view this content.
Who Wins
TenantPlease subscribe v
Please subscribe to pro to view this content.
Please subscribe v
Reason for Relief
Please subscribe to pro to view this content.
Who Wins
TenantPlease subscribe v Please subscribe v Please subscribe v
Please subscribe to pro to view this content. Please subscribe to pro to view this content. Please subscribe to pro to view this content.
Please subscribe v Please subscribe v Please subscribe v
Reason for Relief
Please subscribe to pro to view this content. Please subscribe to pro to view this content. Please subscribe to pro to view this content.
Who Wins
LandlordPlease subscribe v Please subscribe v Please subscribe v
Please subscribe to pro to view this content. Please subscribe to pro to view this content. Please subscribe to pro to view this content.
Unlock Full Access to Peter Nicholson's Decisions
Get a strategic advantage by understanding how they rule on similar cases.
Gain insights on how Peter Nicholson typically rules on cases like yours
Access a full decision history to boost your preparation and confidence
Quote past rulings to strengthen your argument
Lanlord's Notice Found Invalid 7 Orders since 2024PRO
Please subscribe v
Please subscribe to pro to view this content.
Please subscribe v
Reason for Relief
Please subscribe to pro to view this content.
Who Wins
LandlordPlease subscribe v Please subscribe v Please subscribe v
Please subscribe to pro to view this content. Please subscribe to pro to view this content. Please subscribe to pro to view this content.
Please subscribe v Please subscribe v Please subscribe v
Reason for Relief
Please subscribe to pro to view this content. Please subscribe to pro to view this content. Please subscribe to pro to view this content.
Who Wins
TenantPlease subscribe v
Please subscribe to pro to view this content.
Please subscribe v
Reason for Relief
Please subscribe to pro to view this content.
Who Wins
TenantPlease subscribe v Please subscribe v Please subscribe v
Please subscribe to pro to view this content. Please subscribe to pro to view this content. Please subscribe to pro to view this content.
Please subscribe v Please subscribe v Please subscribe v
Reason for Relief
Please subscribe to pro to view this content. Please subscribe to pro to view this content. Please subscribe to pro to view this content.
Who Wins
LandlordPlease subscribe v Please subscribe v Please subscribe v
Please subscribe to pro to view this content. Please subscribe to pro to view this content. Please subscribe to pro to view this content.
Unlock Full Access to Peter Nicholson's Decisions
Get a strategic advantage by understanding how they rule on similar cases.
Gain insights on how Peter Nicholson typically rules on cases like yours
Access a full decision history to boost your preparation and confidence
Quote past rulings to strengthen your argument
Contested Dispute by CategoryPRO
- Maintenance Issues36
Landlord Win Rate: 36.11%
- Breach Of Conditions34
Landlord Win Rate: 20.59%
- Tenant Agreed Termination32
Landlord Win Rate: 68.75%
- Other21
Landlord Win Rate: 38.1%
- Property Damage20
Landlord Win Rate: 45%
- Harassment19
Landlord Win Rate: 36.84%
Unlock Full Access to Peter Nicholson's Decisions
Get a strategic advantage by understanding how they rule on similar cases.
Gain insights on how Peter Nicholson typically rules on cases like yours
Access a full decision history to boost your preparation and confidence
Quote past rulings to strengthen your argument
Latest Orders
Marczenko v Schaap and Jackson
The tenancy was terminated due to the Tenant's guest seriously impairing the safety of others in the residential complex.
Kendrick v Beahan
The Landlord was granted an order to terminate the tenancy for personal use after the Board found the Landlord's intent to be genuine and denied the Tenant's claim of a serious maintenance breach.
CityHousing Hamilton Corporation v Odeshow
The Board granted the Tenant's motion to set aside an eviction order, opting to extend the conditions of a previous order rather than terminate the tenancy.
Marczenko v Schaap and Jackson
The Landlord was granted an eviction order because the Tenant permitted a guest who seriously impaired the safety of others in the residential complex.
Andrade v 14186796 Canada Inc
The Tenant's application for substantial interference was dismissed because the Tenant failed to attend the hearing.
The Tenant's maintenance application was dismissed because the Tenant failed to attend the hearing.
Marczenko v Schaap and Jackson
The tenancy was terminated due to the Tenant's guest seriously impairing the safety of others in the residential complex.
Kendrick v Beahan
The Landlord was granted an order to terminate the tenancy for personal use after the Board found the Landlord's intent to be genuine and denied the Tenant's claim of a serious maintenance breach.
CityHousing Hamilton Corporation v Odeshow
The Board granted the Tenant's motion to set aside an eviction order, opting to extend the conditions of a previous order rather than terminate the tenancy.
Marczenko v Schaap and Jackson
The Landlord was granted an eviction order because the Tenant permitted a guest who seriously impaired the safety of others in the residential complex.
Andrade v 14186796 Canada Inc
The Tenant's application for substantial interference was dismissed because the Tenant failed to attend the hearing.
The Tenant's maintenance application was dismissed because the Tenant failed to attend the hearing.
Marczenko v Schaap and Jackson
The tenancy was terminated due to the Tenant's guest seriously impairing the safety of others in the residential complex.
Kendrick v Beahan
The Landlord was granted an order to terminate the tenancy for personal use after the Board found the Landlord's intent to be genuine and denied the Tenant's claim of a serious maintenance breach.
CityHousing Hamilton Corporation v Odeshow
The Board granted the Tenant's motion to set aside an eviction order, opting to extend the conditions of a previous order rather than terminate the tenancy.
Marczenko v Schaap and Jackson
The Landlord was granted an eviction order because the Tenant permitted a guest who seriously impaired the safety of others in the residential complex.
Andrade v 14186796 Canada Inc
The Tenant's application for substantial interference was dismissed because the Tenant failed to attend the hearing.
The Tenant's maintenance application was dismissed because the Tenant failed to attend the hearing.
Marczenko v Schaap and Jackson
The tenancy was terminated due to the Tenant's guest seriously impairing the safety of others in the residential complex.
Kendrick v Beahan
The Landlord was granted an order to terminate the tenancy for personal use after the Board found the Landlord's intent to be genuine and denied the Tenant's claim of a serious maintenance breach.
CityHousing Hamilton Corporation v Odeshow
The Board granted the Tenant's motion to set aside an eviction order, opting to extend the conditions of a previous order rather than terminate the tenancy.
Marczenko v Schaap and Jackson
The Landlord was granted an eviction order because the Tenant permitted a guest who seriously impaired the safety of others in the residential complex.
Andrade v 14186796 Canada Inc
The Tenant's application for substantial interference was dismissed because the Tenant failed to attend the hearing.
The Tenant's maintenance application was dismissed because the Tenant failed to attend the hearing.
Unlock Full Access to Peter Nicholson's Decisions
Get a strategic advantage by understanding how they rule on similar cases.
Gain insights on how Peter Nicholson typically rules on cases like yours
Access a full decision history to boost your preparation and confidence
Quote past rulings to strengthen your argument
Latest Insights from Our Blog
Stay informed with expert analysis on rental law, tenant rights, and LTB decisions
Conditional Orders and Payment Plans: When the LTB Gives Tenants a Second Chance
Explore how conditional orders and payment plans work at Ontario's LTB, examining real cases where tenants avoided eviction and the factors that influence these crucial second chances.
LTB Maximum Claim Amount in Ontario: What the $50,000 Cap Means for Landlords and Tenants (2025)
Ontario raised the Landlord and Tenant Board monetary limit to $50,000 on October 1, 2025. Learn how RTA section 207 works, what landlords and tenants can claim, and when to stay at the LTB vs. go to court.
HRTO Housing Complaints in Ontario: Landlord, Tenant & Co-op Guide (2026)
Facing discrimination in Ontario rental housing? Learn when to file at the Human Rights Tribunal (HRTO) vs the LTB, protected grounds, accommodation duties, deadlines, and remedies.
Need Legal Help? We've Got You Covered
Whether you need to find qualified legal professionals or post your specific legal needs to get competitive quotes, our platform connects you with the right help.
Find Legal Professionals
Browse our directory of verified paralegals and lawyers specializing in Ontario rental law and LTB matters.
Browse ProfessionalsPost Your Legal Needs
Describe your legal situation and receive competitive quotes from qualified professionals in our marketplace.
Post a BountyJoin thousands of Ontarians who have found legal help through our platform