Michelle Tan
Landlord and Tenant Board (LTB) Adjudicator Past Decisions
Overview
738
164
46
18
Order OutcomesPRO
Eviction Relief Granted to Tenant 46 Orders since 2024PRO
Please subscribe v Please subscribe v Please subscribe v
Please subscribe to pro to view this content. Please subscribe to pro to view this content. Please subscribe to pro to view this content.
Please subscribe v Please subscribe v Please subscribe v
Reason for Relief
Please subscribe to pro to view this content. Please subscribe to pro to view this content. Please subscribe to pro to view this content.
Who Wins
LandlordPlease subscribe v Please subscribe v
Please subscribe to pro to view this content. Please subscribe to pro to view this content.
Please subscribe v Please subscribe v
Reason for Relief
Please subscribe to pro to view this content. Please subscribe to pro to view this content.
Who Wins
TenantPlease subscribe v Please subscribe v
Please subscribe to pro to view this content. Please subscribe to pro to view this content.
Please subscribe v Please subscribe v
Reason for Relief
Please subscribe to pro to view this content. Please subscribe to pro to view this content.
Who Wins
TenantPlease subscribe v Please subscribe v Please subscribe v
Please subscribe to pro to view this content. Please subscribe to pro to view this content. Please subscribe to pro to view this content.
Please subscribe v Please subscribe v Please subscribe v
Reason for Relief
Please subscribe to pro to view this content. Please subscribe to pro to view this content. Please subscribe to pro to view this content.
Who Wins
LandlordPlease subscribe v Please subscribe v
Please subscribe to pro to view this content. Please subscribe to pro to view this content.
Unlock Full Access to Michelle Tan's Decisions
Get a strategic advantage by understanding how they rule on similar cases.
Gain insights on how Michelle Tan typically rules on cases like yours
Access a full decision history to boost your preparation and confidence
Quote past rulings to strengthen your argument
Lanlord's Notice Found Invalid 18 Orders since 2024PRO
Please subscribe v Please subscribe v Please subscribe v
Please subscribe to pro to view this content. Please subscribe to pro to view this content. Please subscribe to pro to view this content.
Please subscribe v Please subscribe v Please subscribe v
Reason for Relief
Please subscribe to pro to view this content. Please subscribe to pro to view this content. Please subscribe to pro to view this content.
Who Wins
LandlordPlease subscribe v Please subscribe v
Please subscribe to pro to view this content. Please subscribe to pro to view this content.
Please subscribe v Please subscribe v
Reason for Relief
Please subscribe to pro to view this content. Please subscribe to pro to view this content.
Who Wins
TenantPlease subscribe v Please subscribe v
Please subscribe to pro to view this content. Please subscribe to pro to view this content.
Please subscribe v Please subscribe v
Reason for Relief
Please subscribe to pro to view this content. Please subscribe to pro to view this content.
Who Wins
TenantPlease subscribe v Please subscribe v Please subscribe v
Please subscribe to pro to view this content. Please subscribe to pro to view this content. Please subscribe to pro to view this content.
Please subscribe v Please subscribe v Please subscribe v
Reason for Relief
Please subscribe to pro to view this content. Please subscribe to pro to view this content. Please subscribe to pro to view this content.
Who Wins
LandlordPlease subscribe v Please subscribe v
Please subscribe to pro to view this content. Please subscribe to pro to view this content.
Unlock Full Access to Michelle Tan's Decisions
Get a strategic advantage by understanding how they rule on similar cases.
Gain insights on how Michelle Tan typically rules on cases like yours
Access a full decision history to boost your preparation and confidence
Quote past rulings to strengthen your argument
Contested Dispute by CategoryPRO
- Substantial Interference26
Landlord Win Rate: 19.23%
- Maintenance Issues24
Landlord Win Rate: 33.33%
- Tenant Rights18
Landlord Win Rate: 50%
- Harassment14
Landlord Win Rate: 28.57%
- Property Damage7
Landlord Win Rate: 0%
- Bad Faith Eviction6
Landlord Win Rate: 50%
Unlock Full Access to Michelle Tan's Decisions
Get a strategic advantage by understanding how they rule on similar cases.
Gain insights on how Michelle Tan typically rules on cases like yours
Access a full decision history to boost your preparation and confidence
Quote past rulings to strengthen your argument
Latest Orders
The Landlord's application was dismissed after the Landlord failed to properly serve the Tenants with notice of the de novo hearing.
Stonebrook II Limited Partnership v Daley
The Landlord's application to terminate the tenancy was dismissed after the Landlord failed to attend the hearing.
The Landlord's application to terminate the tenancy for persistent late payment of rent was dismissed because the N8 notice was fatally defective.
The Landlord's L2 application for persistent late payment was dismissed because the N8 notice was fatally defective for failing to provide adequate reasons and details as required by the Act.
Citijen Realty Investment Inc. v Grummett
The Landlord's application to terminate the tenancy was dismissed because the N5 and N8 notices provided were found to be legally defective.
1732849 Ontario Inc. v Cook
The Landlord's application for termination and eviction based on substantial interference was dismissed because the Landlord did not attend the hearing.
The Landlord's application was dismissed after the Landlord failed to properly serve the Tenants with notice of the de novo hearing.
Stonebrook II Limited Partnership v Daley
The Landlord's application to terminate the tenancy was dismissed after the Landlord failed to attend the hearing.
The Landlord's application to terminate the tenancy for persistent late payment of rent was dismissed because the N8 notice was fatally defective.
The Landlord's L2 application for persistent late payment was dismissed because the N8 notice was fatally defective for failing to provide adequate reasons and details as required by the Act.
Citijen Realty Investment Inc. v Grummett
The Landlord's application to terminate the tenancy was dismissed because the N5 and N8 notices provided were found to be legally defective.
1732849 Ontario Inc. v Cook
The Landlord's application for termination and eviction based on substantial interference was dismissed because the Landlord did not attend the hearing.
The Landlord's application was dismissed after the Landlord failed to properly serve the Tenants with notice of the de novo hearing.
Stonebrook II Limited Partnership v Daley
The Landlord's application to terminate the tenancy was dismissed after the Landlord failed to attend the hearing.
The Landlord's application to terminate the tenancy for persistent late payment of rent was dismissed because the N8 notice was fatally defective.
The Landlord's L2 application for persistent late payment was dismissed because the N8 notice was fatally defective for failing to provide adequate reasons and details as required by the Act.
Citijen Realty Investment Inc. v Grummett
The Landlord's application to terminate the tenancy was dismissed because the N5 and N8 notices provided were found to be legally defective.
1732849 Ontario Inc. v Cook
The Landlord's application for termination and eviction based on substantial interference was dismissed because the Landlord did not attend the hearing.
The Landlord's application was dismissed after the Landlord failed to properly serve the Tenants with notice of the de novo hearing.
Stonebrook II Limited Partnership v Daley
The Landlord's application to terminate the tenancy was dismissed after the Landlord failed to attend the hearing.
The Landlord's application to terminate the tenancy for persistent late payment of rent was dismissed because the N8 notice was fatally defective.
The Landlord's L2 application for persistent late payment was dismissed because the N8 notice was fatally defective for failing to provide adequate reasons and details as required by the Act.
Citijen Realty Investment Inc. v Grummett
The Landlord's application to terminate the tenancy was dismissed because the N5 and N8 notices provided were found to be legally defective.
1732849 Ontario Inc. v Cook
The Landlord's application for termination and eviction based on substantial interference was dismissed because the Landlord did not attend the hearing.
Unlock Full Access to Michelle Tan's Decisions
Get a strategic advantage by understanding how they rule on similar cases.
Gain insights on how Michelle Tan typically rules on cases like yours
Access a full decision history to boost your preparation and confidence
Quote past rulings to strengthen your argument
Latest Insights from Our Blog
Stay informed with expert analysis on rental law, tenant rights, and LTB decisions
When Landlords Strike Back: Understanding Retaliation and Protecting Your Rights in Ontario
Discover how to recognize, document, and fight landlord retaliation in Ontario. Learn about legal protections, compensation awards, and strategies to enforce your tenant rights without fear of reprisal.
Utility Billing Disputes and Illegal Charges: Understanding Your Rights in Ontario's Rental Market
An in-depth analysis of utility billing disputes at Ontario's LTB reveals common overcharging practices, jurisdictional limitations, and the financial consequences for both landlords and tenants when utility agreements go wrong.
London, Ontario Tenant Paralegals: How to Find LTB Representation and Defend Your Rights (2026)
Facing eviction or landlord harassment in London, Ontario? Learn what tenant paralegals do at the LTB, when to hire one, and meet Southwestern Ontario advocates ranked by real tribunal records.
Need Legal Help? We've Got You Covered
Whether you need to find qualified legal professionals or post your specific legal needs to get competitive quotes, our platform connects you with the right help.
Find Legal Professionals
Browse our directory of verified paralegals and lawyers specializing in Ontario rental law and LTB matters.
Browse ProfessionalsPost Your Legal Needs
Describe your legal situation and receive competitive quotes from qualified professionals in our marketplace.
Post a BountyJoin thousands of Ontarians who have found legal help through our platform