Kate Sinipostolova
Landlord and Tenant Board (LTB) Adjudicator Past Decisions
Overview
387
377
90
27
Order OutcomesPRO
Eviction Relief Granted to Tenant 90 Orders since 2024PRO
Please subscribe v Please subscribe v
Please subscribe to pro to view this content. Please subscribe to pro to view this content.
Please subscribe v Please subscribe v
Reason for Relief
Please subscribe to pro to view this content. Please subscribe to pro to view this content.
Who Wins
LandlordPlease subscribe v
Please subscribe to pro to view this content.
Please subscribe v
Reason for Relief
Please subscribe to pro to view this content.
Who Wins
TenantPlease subscribe v
Please subscribe to pro to view this content.
Please subscribe v
Reason for Relief
Please subscribe to pro to view this content.
Who Wins
TenantPlease subscribe v
Please subscribe to pro to view this content.
Please subscribe v
Reason for Relief
Please subscribe to pro to view this content.
Who Wins
LandlordPlease subscribe v Please subscribe v Please subscribe v
Please subscribe to pro to view this content. Please subscribe to pro to view this content. Please subscribe to pro to view this content.
Unlock Full Access to Kate Sinipostolova's Decisions
Get a strategic advantage by understanding how they rule on similar cases.
Gain insights on how Kate Sinipostolova typically rules on cases like yours
Access a full decision history to boost your preparation and confidence
Quote past rulings to strengthen your argument
Lanlord's Notice Found Invalid 27 Orders since 2024PRO
Please subscribe v Please subscribe v
Please subscribe to pro to view this content. Please subscribe to pro to view this content.
Please subscribe v Please subscribe v
Reason for Relief
Please subscribe to pro to view this content. Please subscribe to pro to view this content.
Who Wins
LandlordPlease subscribe v
Please subscribe to pro to view this content.
Please subscribe v
Reason for Relief
Please subscribe to pro to view this content.
Who Wins
TenantPlease subscribe v
Please subscribe to pro to view this content.
Please subscribe v
Reason for Relief
Please subscribe to pro to view this content.
Who Wins
TenantPlease subscribe v
Please subscribe to pro to view this content.
Please subscribe v
Reason for Relief
Please subscribe to pro to view this content.
Who Wins
LandlordPlease subscribe v Please subscribe v Please subscribe v
Please subscribe to pro to view this content. Please subscribe to pro to view this content. Please subscribe to pro to view this content.
Unlock Full Access to Kate Sinipostolova's Decisions
Get a strategic advantage by understanding how they rule on similar cases.
Gain insights on how Kate Sinipostolova typically rules on cases like yours
Access a full decision history to boost your preparation and confidence
Quote past rulings to strengthen your argument
Contested Dispute by CategoryPRO
- Maintenance Issues24
Landlord Win Rate: 37.5%
- Property Damage23
Landlord Win Rate: 52.17%
- Breach Of Conditions16
Landlord Win Rate: 18.75%
- Harassment13
Landlord Win Rate: 30.77%
- Tenant Rights13
Landlord Win Rate: 30.77%
- Bad Faith Eviction12
Landlord Win Rate: 41.67%
Unlock Full Access to Kate Sinipostolova's Decisions
Get a strategic advantage by understanding how they rule on similar cases.
Gain insights on how Kate Sinipostolova typically rules on cases like yours
Access a full decision history to boost your preparation and confidence
Quote past rulings to strengthen your argument
Latest Orders
The Landlord's review request of an order regarding illegal rent increases was denied due to a lack of credible evidence from either party.
Dupont/Lansdowne Holdings Inc v Fortunado
The Landlord and Tenant entered into a consent order allowing the tenancy to continue provided the Tenant pays rent on time and covers the outstanding filing fee.
Lu v A* Otti
The Landlord's application was dismissed after the adjudicator determined that a binding agreement existed to vacate the unit and withdraw the application.
The Tenant's application alleging harassment by the Landlord was dismissed because the Tenant did not attend the scheduled hearing.
The Tenant's review request was denied after the member found the original order was reasonable and the Tenant had failed to serve their evidence in accordance with procedural rules.
Tucakov v Ines
The Landlord withdrew the application to terminate the tenancy due to a defective notice.
The Landlord's review request of an order regarding illegal rent increases was denied due to a lack of credible evidence from either party.
Dupont/Lansdowne Holdings Inc v Fortunado
The Landlord and Tenant entered into a consent order allowing the tenancy to continue provided the Tenant pays rent on time and covers the outstanding filing fee.
Lu v A* Otti
The Landlord's application was dismissed after the adjudicator determined that a binding agreement existed to vacate the unit and withdraw the application.
The Tenant's application alleging harassment by the Landlord was dismissed because the Tenant did not attend the scheduled hearing.
The Tenant's review request was denied after the member found the original order was reasonable and the Tenant had failed to serve their evidence in accordance with procedural rules.
Tucakov v Ines
The Landlord withdrew the application to terminate the tenancy due to a defective notice.
The Landlord's review request of an order regarding illegal rent increases was denied due to a lack of credible evidence from either party.
Dupont/Lansdowne Holdings Inc v Fortunado
The Landlord and Tenant entered into a consent order allowing the tenancy to continue provided the Tenant pays rent on time and covers the outstanding filing fee.
Lu v A* Otti
The Landlord's application was dismissed after the adjudicator determined that a binding agreement existed to vacate the unit and withdraw the application.
The Tenant's application alleging harassment by the Landlord was dismissed because the Tenant did not attend the scheduled hearing.
The Tenant's review request was denied after the member found the original order was reasonable and the Tenant had failed to serve their evidence in accordance with procedural rules.
Tucakov v Ines
The Landlord withdrew the application to terminate the tenancy due to a defective notice.
The Landlord's review request of an order regarding illegal rent increases was denied due to a lack of credible evidence from either party.
Dupont/Lansdowne Holdings Inc v Fortunado
The Landlord and Tenant entered into a consent order allowing the tenancy to continue provided the Tenant pays rent on time and covers the outstanding filing fee.
Lu v A* Otti
The Landlord's application was dismissed after the adjudicator determined that a binding agreement existed to vacate the unit and withdraw the application.
The Tenant's application alleging harassment by the Landlord was dismissed because the Tenant did not attend the scheduled hearing.
The Tenant's review request was denied after the member found the original order was reasonable and the Tenant had failed to serve their evidence in accordance with procedural rules.
Tucakov v Ines
The Landlord withdrew the application to terminate the tenancy due to a defective notice.
Unlock Full Access to Kate Sinipostolova's Decisions
Get a strategic advantage by understanding how they rule on similar cases.
Gain insights on how Kate Sinipostolova typically rules on cases like yours
Access a full decision history to boost your preparation and confidence
Quote past rulings to strengthen your argument
Latest Insights from Our Blog
Stay informed with expert analysis on rental law, tenant rights, and LTB decisions
How to Evict an Ontario Tenant for Unpaid Rent: Complete N4-to-LTB Guide (2026)
Ontario landlords: learn the full legal process to evict a tenant for rent arrears — from serving the N4 notice and filing the L1 application to LTB hearing prep, payment plans, and enforcement. Step-by-step timeline with common mistakes to avoid.
How to Appeal an LTB Order to Divisional Court in Ontario: Step-by-Step Filing Guide (2026)
Lost at the Landlord and Tenant Board? Learn how to appeal an LTB order to Ontario's Divisional Court—30-day deadlines, Form 61A.1, Form 61C, service rules, automatic stays, costs, and why you need a lawyer, not a paralegal.
Ontario Bill 60 Explained: LTB Rule Changes for Landlords and Tenants (2026 Guide)
Bill 60 amends Ontario's Residential Tenancies Act to speed up LTB cases. Learn what changed — N4 timelines, section 82 pay-in rules, N12 compensation, review deadlines — and which provisions are in force as of May 2026.
Need Legal Help? We've Got You Covered
Whether you need to find qualified legal professionals or post your specific legal needs to get competitive quotes, our platform connects you with the right help.
Find Legal Professionals
Browse our directory of verified paralegals and lawyers specializing in Ontario rental law and LTB matters.
Browse ProfessionalsPost Your Legal Needs
Describe your legal situation and receive competitive quotes from qualified professionals in our marketplace.
Post a BountyJoin thousands of Ontarians who have found legal help through our platform