Al Dharsee
LTB hearings are conducted online. Paralegals can practice across Ontario
Contact Information
✓ Al Dharsee is in good standing with the Law Society of Ontario and has no practice restrictions.
Performance Statistics
Contested Cases
4
Wins
4
Win Rate
100%
Contested Cases Rank
Wins Rank
Current Ratings
Total Reviews
Min. 3 reviews needed
Response Rate
Min. 3 reviews needed
Submit Your Feedback
Your feedback helps:
- Build trust in our legal community
- Others find reliable legal representation
- Promote transparency and accountability
- Improve our paralegals directory
Win Rate by Category
Contested disputes only. Include additional cases where the representative's name is potentially misspelled or abbreviated
- Non Payment Of Rent4
Win Rate: 75%
- Other4
Win Rate: 100%
Need assistance from an expert?
Sponsored
Recent Representation
Contested Disputes only. Include additional cases where the representative's name is potentially misspelled or abbreviated
Ceming v Piatkowski
Sudbury landlords evict tenant for $9,700 in unpaid rent
Ceming v Wyman
Sudbury landlord evicts hoarder tenant for interfering with other tenants
Trivest Developments Corporation v Tenants
Landlord wins rent reduction dispute, variation granted from 0.66% to 0.42% effective December 31, 2019.
Trivest Developments Corporation v Tenants
Landlord wins rent reduction dispute, allowed to reduce rent by 0.41% instead of 0.66%.
Danton Place Apartments Limited v Tenants
Landlord granted 1.79% rent increase to cover elevator modernization costs in Toronto apartment building.
Guerra v Haniff and Rampersad
Oshawa landlord awarded eviction and $18,000 in rent arrears after tenants failed to uphold repayment agreement.
Jain v Henderson
Toronto landlords awarded $33,000 in rent arrears and costs after successful eviction of non-paying tenant.
Guerra and Turpin v Haniff and Rampersad
Landlords and tenants in Oshawa reach agreement on $18,417 rent arrears payment plan.
Ceming v Piatkowski
Sudbury landlords evict tenant for $9,700 in unpaid rent
Ceming v Wyman
Sudbury landlord evicts hoarder tenant for interfering with other tenants
Trivest Developments Corporation v Tenants
Landlord wins rent reduction dispute, variation granted from 0.66% to 0.42% effective December 31, 2019.
Trivest Developments Corporation v Tenants
Landlord wins rent reduction dispute, allowed to reduce rent by 0.41% instead of 0.66%.
Ceming v Piatkowski
Sudbury landlords evict tenant for $9,700 in unpaid rent
Ceming v Wyman
Sudbury landlord evicts hoarder tenant for interfering with other tenants
Trivest Developments Corporation v Tenants
Landlord wins rent reduction dispute, variation granted from 0.66% to 0.42% effective December 31, 2019.
Trivest Developments Corporation v Tenants
Landlord wins rent reduction dispute, allowed to reduce rent by 0.41% instead of 0.66%.
Ceming v Piatkowski
Sudbury landlords evict tenant for $9,700 in unpaid rent
Ceming v Wyman
Sudbury landlord evicts hoarder tenant for interfering with other tenants
Trivest Developments Corporation v Tenants
Landlord wins rent reduction dispute, variation granted from 0.66% to 0.42% effective December 31, 2019.
Trivest Developments Corporation v Tenants
Landlord wins rent reduction dispute, allowed to reduce rent by 0.41% instead of 0.66%.
Danton Place Apartments Limited v Tenants
Landlord granted 1.79% rent increase to cover elevator modernization costs in Toronto apartment building.
Guerra v Haniff and Rampersad
Oshawa landlord awarded eviction and $18,000 in rent arrears after tenants failed to uphold repayment agreement.
Ceming v Piatkowski
Sudbury landlords evict tenant for $9,700 in unpaid rent
Ceming v Wyman
Sudbury landlord evicts hoarder tenant for interfering with other tenants
Trivest Developments Corporation v Tenants
Landlord wins rent reduction dispute, variation granted from 0.66% to 0.42% effective December 31, 2019.
Trivest Developments Corporation v Tenants
Landlord wins rent reduction dispute, allowed to reduce rent by 0.41% instead of 0.66%.
Danton Place Apartments Limited v Tenants
Landlord granted 1.79% rent increase to cover elevator modernization costs in Toronto apartment building.
Guerra v Haniff and Rampersad
Oshawa landlord awarded eviction and $18,000 in rent arrears after tenants failed to uphold repayment agreement.
Jain v Henderson
Toronto landlords awarded $33,000 in rent arrears and costs after successful eviction of non-paying tenant.
Guerra and Turpin v Haniff and Rampersad
Landlords and tenants in Oshawa reach agreement on $18,417 rent arrears payment plan.
See Complete Cases by Al Dharsee
Hire paralegals that have won real cases similar to yours.
Identify similar cases to yours for a targeted consultation
Evaluate your chances of winning from precedences
Build trust with real cases represented by the paralegal