Landlord Wins Substantial Interference Case: Zhao v Fallis 2024
Etobicoke tenants ordered to pay $204 to landlord for unpaid utility bills and application fees
Summarized by RentZenLast updated: October 27, 2024
Case Summary
17 Deeside Court, Etobicoke, ON M9W2E1
Decision in favor of
landlord
Balance Owed to Landlord
$204
Dispute Categories
Agree with the ruling?
Timeline
Application Date
Sep 2023
Hearing Date
May 2024
Order Date
Jun 10, 2024
Dispute Summary
Landlord applied for an order to terminate the tenancy and evict Tenants due to substantial interference with the reasonable enjoyment or lawful right, privilege or interest of the Landlord or another tenant. The Landlord also claimed compensation for each day the Tenants remained in the unit after the termination date and for unpaid utility costs.
Determinations
- Tenants vacated the rental unit on 2024-04-23 in compliance with a related LTB order
- Tenants responsible for paying utilities under tenancy agreement
- Tenants owe $18.09 for water utility from 2023-02-26 to 2023-06-25
- Landlord's evidence accepted as truthful and accurate
- Matter converted to an L10 application
Arguments and Actions
Tenant
Actions
Tenants vacated the rental unit on 2024-04-23 in compliance with a related LTB order.
Decision Summary
The Tenants are ordered to pay the Landlord $18.09 for unpaid water utility costs and $186 for the application filing fee, for a total of $204.09. If the Tenants do not pay the full amount by June 21, 2024, they will start owing interest at 7% annually on the outstanding balance.
Adjudicator Details
LTB Member
Total Orders
275
Landlord Favorable
87.6%
Tenant Favorable
4.4%
Mutual Agreement
8.0%
Need assistance from an expert?
Sponsored
Financial Details
Application Fee
$186
Other Owed Amount
$18
Unpaid water utility
Total Owing
$204 (Owed to Landlord)
Source
Similar Cases
Click to switch between case outcomes
Sripathy v Chilvers
Waterdown landlords regain possession of rental unit for personal use, tenant must vacate by January 31, 2025.
Singh v Gray
LTB upholds consent order terminating tenancy for non-payment of rent in Toronto.
Yassin v Smith
Pickering tenant faces potential eviction after dispute over rent increase and arrears
Hazelview Property Services Inc. v Fatemi
Toronto tenant evicted for non-payment of rent, owes $8,938.24 to landlord.
Sripathy v Chilvers
Waterdown landlords regain possession of rental unit for personal use, tenant must vacate by January 31, 2025.
Singh v Gray
LTB upholds consent order terminating tenancy for non-payment of rent in Toronto.
Yassin v Smith
Pickering tenant faces potential eviction after dispute over rent increase and arrears
Hazelview Property Services Inc. v Fatemi
Toronto tenant evicted for non-payment of rent, owes $8,938.24 to landlord.
Sripathy v Chilvers
Waterdown landlords regain possession of rental unit for personal use, tenant must vacate by January 31, 2025.
Singh v Gray
LTB upholds consent order terminating tenancy for non-payment of rent in Toronto.
Yassin v Smith
Pickering tenant faces potential eviction after dispute over rent increase and arrears
Hazelview Property Services Inc. v Fatemi
Toronto tenant evicted for non-payment of rent, owes $8,938.24 to landlord.
Sripathy v Chilvers
Waterdown landlords regain possession of rental unit for personal use, tenant must vacate by January 31, 2025.
Singh v Gray
LTB upholds consent order terminating tenancy for non-payment of rent in Toronto.
Yassin v Smith
Pickering tenant faces potential eviction after dispute over rent increase and arrears
Hazelview Property Services Inc. v Fatemi
Toronto tenant evicted for non-payment of rent, owes $8,938.24 to landlord.
Goklani v Cannata
Toronto tenants' maintenance dispute against landlord dismissed by LTB
Jeff v Ferguson
Woodstock landlords awarded $35,186 in rent arrears, tenants face eviction for non-payment.
Oxford Properties Group v Benjamin
Tenant ordered to pay $22,461.70 for flood damage with conditional tenancy preservation
Sufi Properties Ltd v Nieman
Tenants ordered to pay $16,866 in rent arrears to Former Landlord after complex dispute.