Landlord Wins Personal Use Case: Yoel Moyal v Lorrendel Cinco 2023
Landlord wins personal use case, Toronto tenants compensated $8500 to vacate
Summarized by RentZenLast updated: September 12, 2024
Case Summary
91 Kimberley Avenue, Toronto, ON M2E2Z4
Dispute resolved in
agreement
Balance Owed
-
Dispute Categories
Notices Sent
Agree with the ruling?
Timeline
Application Date
Dec 2022
Hearing Date
Mar 2023
Order Date
May 29, 2023
Tenancy End Date
Jul 2023
Dispute Summary
Landlord applied for an order to terminate the tenancy and evict Tenants because the Landlord requires possession of the rental unit in order to demolish the unit.
Determinations
- Landlord requires unit for personal use (demolition)
- Tenants must vacate by July 1, 2023
- Landlord to compensate Tenants $8,500 for keys
Case Study
The parties agreed to the termination of the tenancy and the Landlord's requirement to demolish the unit. The Tenants will be compensated for vacating the unit.
Decision Summary
The tenancy between the Landlord and the Tenants is terminated. The Tenants must move out of the rental unit on or before July 1, 2023. The Landlord shall compensate the Tenants $8,500.00 in guaranteed funds, in exchange for the rental unit keys, on or before July 1, 2023. If the Landlord does not make the full payment, then the Landlord will start to owe interest at 6.00% annually on the balance outstanding.
Adjudicator Details
LTB Member
Total Orders
15
Landlord Favorable
60.0%
Tenant Favorable
0.0%
Mutual Agreement
40.0%
Need assistance from an expert?
Sponsored
Financial Details
Lawful Rent
$1,400
Source
Similar Cases
Click to switch between case outcomes
Sripathy v Chilvers
Waterdown landlords regain possession of rental unit for personal use, tenant must vacate by January 31, 2025.
Singh v Gray
LTB upholds consent order terminating tenancy for non-payment of rent in Toronto.
Yassin v Smith
Pickering tenant faces potential eviction after dispute over rent increase and arrears
Hazelview Property Services Inc. v Fatemi
Toronto tenant evicted for non-payment of rent, owes $8,938.24 to landlord.
Sripathy v Chilvers
Waterdown landlords regain possession of rental unit for personal use, tenant must vacate by January 31, 2025.
Singh v Gray
LTB upholds consent order terminating tenancy for non-payment of rent in Toronto.
Yassin v Smith
Pickering tenant faces potential eviction after dispute over rent increase and arrears
Hazelview Property Services Inc. v Fatemi
Toronto tenant evicted for non-payment of rent, owes $8,938.24 to landlord.
Sripathy v Chilvers
Waterdown landlords regain possession of rental unit for personal use, tenant must vacate by January 31, 2025.
Singh v Gray
LTB upholds consent order terminating tenancy for non-payment of rent in Toronto.
Yassin v Smith
Pickering tenant faces potential eviction after dispute over rent increase and arrears
Hazelview Property Services Inc. v Fatemi
Toronto tenant evicted for non-payment of rent, owes $8,938.24 to landlord.
Sripathy v Chilvers
Waterdown landlords regain possession of rental unit for personal use, tenant must vacate by January 31, 2025.
Singh v Gray
LTB upholds consent order terminating tenancy for non-payment of rent in Toronto.
Yassin v Smith
Pickering tenant faces potential eviction after dispute over rent increase and arrears
Hazelview Property Services Inc. v Fatemi
Toronto tenant evicted for non-payment of rent, owes $8,938.24 to landlord.
Goklani v Cannata
Toronto tenants' maintenance dispute against landlord dismissed by LTB
Jeff v Ferguson
Woodstock landlords awarded $35,186 in rent arrears, tenants face eviction for non-payment.
Oxford Properties Group v Benjamin
Tenant ordered to pay $22,461.70 for flood damage with conditional tenancy preservation
Sufi Properties Ltd v Nieman
Tenants ordered to pay $16,866 in rent arrears to Former Landlord after complex dispute.