Xavier v Subramaniam

Last updated: September 12, 2024

Order

Ordered by Elan Shemtov,Tribunals Ontario  under Section 69, Residential Tenancies Act 2006

Order Date: November 10, 2023
*** Gilbank Dr, Aurora, ON L4G5G2
Contested Dispute

Decision in favor of

Tenant

Ordered Amount

$11,053

to Tenants

Dispute Categories

ContentionHigh

Agree with the ruling?

Citation: Xavier v Subramaniam, 2023 ONLTB 71305

File Number: LTB-T-009310-23

Timeline

Tenancy End Date

Aug 2023

3 months

Hearing Date

Oct 2023

23 days

Order Date

Nov 10, 2023

Decision

The Landlords must pay the Tenants $11,053.00, which includes $11,000.00 for illegal rent collected and $53.00 for the cost of filing the application. The Landlords failed to serve a proper Notice of Rent Increase as required by the Act, and the rent increase from January 1, 2022 is invalid.

Unlock Order Content

Landlord

Representative | Paralegal

    Tenant

    Representative | Paralegal

    Dispute

    Tenants applied for an order determining that Landlords collected or retained money illegally by increasing the rent without proper notice. The Landlords admitted they did not serve a proper Notice of Rent Increase as required by the Act.

    Unlock Order Content

    Determinations

    • Landlords collected rent in excess of the amount allowed by the Act
    • Landlords did not serve proper Notice of Rent Increase
    • Rent increase from January 1, 2022 is invalid and void
    • Tenants entitled to illegally collected rent from January 2022 to August 2023
    • Unlock Order Content

    Landlord's Arguments

    Arguments

    Landlords claimed there was never actually a rent increase, and the Tenants were the ones who asked for the increase to extend their tenancy.

    Unlock Order Content

    Actions and Evidence

    Landlords admitted they did not serve a proper Notice of Rent Increase as required by the Act.

    Unlock Order Content

    Tenant's Arguments

    Actions and Evidence

    Tenants paid $2,300 in rent from May 2021 to December 2021, and $2,850 from January 2022 to August 2023.

    Unlock Order Content

    Need assistance from an expert?

    Financial Details

    Lawful Rent

    $2,300

    Application Fee

    $53

    Other Amount

    $11,000

    Illegal rent collected

    Ordered Amount

    $11,053 (to Tenants)

    Similar Cases

    Click to switch between order outcomes

    Heubner v Dewe-Boucher

    Contested Dispute
    Landlord Wins
    March 12, 2025
    Cornwall

    Cornwall tenant faces eviction for $11,391 in non-payment of rent.

    Section 82 Issues Raised and Denied
    ContentionModerate

    Zetchaku v Hazelview Property Services Inc

    Contested Dispute
    Landlord Wins
    March 5, 2025
    Toronto

    LTB dismisses tenant's maintenance complaint against Toronto landlord, finding reasonable response to issues.

    ContentionLow

    16127720 Canada Inc. v Stevens

    Contested Dispute
    Landlord Wins

    Landlord granted eviction order against tenant who caused damage and safety issues at residential complex.

    Eviction Relief Granted
    ContentionHigh

    MM Nominee Corp. v Oba

    Contested Dispute
    Landlord Wins
    February 21, 2025
    North York

    Landlord wins non-payment case, but tenant granted conditional relief from eviction to repay $4,589.97 in arrears.

    Eviction Relief Granted
    Section 82 Issues Raised and Denied
    ContentionModerate

    Heubner v Dewe-Boucher

    Contested Dispute
    Landlord Wins
    March 12, 2025
    Cornwall

    Cornwall tenant faces eviction for $11,391 in non-payment of rent.

    Section 82 Issues Raised and Denied
    ContentionModerate

    Zetchaku v Hazelview Property Services Inc

    Contested Dispute
    Landlord Wins
    March 5, 2025
    Toronto

    LTB dismisses tenant's maintenance complaint against Toronto landlord, finding reasonable response to issues.

    ContentionLow

    16127720 Canada Inc. v Stevens

    Contested Dispute
    Landlord Wins

    Landlord granted eviction order against tenant who caused damage and safety issues at residential complex.

    Eviction Relief Granted
    ContentionHigh

    MM Nominee Corp. v Oba

    Contested Dispute
    Landlord Wins
    February 21, 2025
    North York

    Landlord wins non-payment case, but tenant granted conditional relief from eviction to repay $4,589.97 in arrears.

    Eviction Relief Granted
    Section 82 Issues Raised and Denied
    ContentionModerate

    Unlock More Similar Orders

    Access our complete database of similar cases to make more informed decisions and better understand LTB rulings.

    Compare outcomes of similar cases to assess your position

    Analyze patterns in LTB decisions for your case type

    Build stronger arguments with real case references

    Share: