Wolf v. Manulife: Court Upholds Landlord's Right to Non-Renewal
Court upholds landlord's right to not renew fixed-term lease, dismissing tenants' harassment claim
Summarized by RentZenLast updated: August 16, 2024
Case Summary
Decision in favor of
landlord
Balance Owed to Landlord
$2,500
Dispute Categories
Agree with the ruling?
Timeline
Hearing Date
Apr 2023
Order Date
Apr 17, 2023
Dispute Summary
Tenants appealed an LTB decision that dismissed their application alleging harassment by the landlord. The tenants claimed that the landlord's decision not to renew their fixed-term lease, allowing it to become a month-to-month tenancy, constituted harassment under the Residential Tenancies Act.
Determinations
- Landlord's non-renewal of fixed-term lease is permitted under RTA
- Resulting month-to-month tenancy provides same tenant protections
- LTB's decision to not hear evidence on landlord's motivation was procedurally fair
- Tenants' argument had no legal foundation
Case Study
The court found that the tenants' position was based on an incorrect legal analysis. The landlord's decision not to renew the fixed-term lease was within their rights under the Residential Tenancies Act, and the resulting month-to-month tenancy provided the same protections to the tenants. The court determined that the LTB's decision to not hear evidence on the landlord's motivation was procedurally fair, as the tenants' argument was not legally viable.
Arguments and Actions
Landlord
Arguments
Landlord argued that their actions were permitted under section 38(1) of the Residential Tenancies Act, which allows for automatic conversion to month-to-month tenancies upon expiration of fixed-term leases.
Actions
Landlord changed its practice of renewing residential leases for one-year terms, allowing them to become month-to-month tenancies.
Tenant
Arguments
Tenants argued that the landlord's non-renewal of their fixed-term lease constituted harassment under section 23 of the Residential Tenancies Act.
Actions
Tenants filed an application with the LTB alleging harassment by the landlord for not renewing their fixed-term lease.
Decision Summary
The Divisional Court dismissed the tenants' appeal, affirming the LTB's decision. The court found that the landlord's decision not to renew the fixed-term lease was within their rights under the Residential Tenancies Act and did not constitute harassment. The resulting month-to-month tenancy provided the same protections to the tenants. The court also found that the LTB's refusal to hear evidence on the landlord's motivation was procedurally fair, as the tenants' argument had no legal foundation.
Adjudicator Details
Divisional Court
Total Orders
19
Landlord Favorable
79.0%
Tenant Favorable
15.8%
Mutual Agreement
5.3%
Need assistance from an expert?
Sponsored
Financial Details
Other Owed Amount
$2,500
Costs awarded to landlord
Total Owing
$2,500 (Owed to Landlord)
Source
Similar Cases
Click to switch between case outcomes
Sripathy v Chilvers
Waterdown landlords regain possession of rental unit for personal use, tenant must vacate by January 31, 2025.
Singh v Gray
LTB upholds consent order terminating tenancy for non-payment of rent in Toronto.
Yassin v Smith
Pickering tenant faces potential eviction after dispute over rent increase and arrears
Hazelview Property Services Inc. v Fatemi
Toronto tenant evicted for non-payment of rent, owes $8,938.24 to landlord.
Sripathy v Chilvers
Waterdown landlords regain possession of rental unit for personal use, tenant must vacate by January 31, 2025.
Singh v Gray
LTB upholds consent order terminating tenancy for non-payment of rent in Toronto.
Yassin v Smith
Pickering tenant faces potential eviction after dispute over rent increase and arrears
Hazelview Property Services Inc. v Fatemi
Toronto tenant evicted for non-payment of rent, owes $8,938.24 to landlord.
Sripathy v Chilvers
Waterdown landlords regain possession of rental unit for personal use, tenant must vacate by January 31, 2025.
Singh v Gray
LTB upholds consent order terminating tenancy for non-payment of rent in Toronto.
Yassin v Smith
Pickering tenant faces potential eviction after dispute over rent increase and arrears
Hazelview Property Services Inc. v Fatemi
Toronto tenant evicted for non-payment of rent, owes $8,938.24 to landlord.
Sripathy v Chilvers
Waterdown landlords regain possession of rental unit for personal use, tenant must vacate by January 31, 2025.
Singh v Gray
LTB upholds consent order terminating tenancy for non-payment of rent in Toronto.
Yassin v Smith
Pickering tenant faces potential eviction after dispute over rent increase and arrears
Hazelview Property Services Inc. v Fatemi
Toronto tenant evicted for non-payment of rent, owes $8,938.24 to landlord.
Goklani v Cannata
Toronto tenants' maintenance dispute against landlord dismissed by LTB
Jeff v Ferguson
Woodstock landlords awarded $35,186 in rent arrears, tenants face eviction for non-payment.
Oxford Properties Group v Benjamin
Tenant ordered to pay $22,461.70 for flood damage with conditional tenancy preservation
Sufi Properties Ltd v Nieman
Tenants ordered to pay $16,866 in rent arrears to Former Landlord after complex dispute.