So v. Canadian Mental Health Association, Toronto Branch

Last updated: August 16, 2024

Order

Order Date: June 12, 2024
Contested Dispute

Decision in favor of

Landlord

Ordered Amount

-

Dispute Categories

ContentionHigh

Agree with the ruling?

Citation: So v. Canadian Mental Health Association, Toronto Branch, 2024 ONSC 3371

File Number: 603/23

Timeline

Hearing Date

Jun 2024

1 days

Order Date

Jun 12, 2024

Decision

The Divisional Court dismissed the tenant's appeal of the Landlord and Tenant Board's decision to reject her request for reconsideration of a consent order terminating her tenancy. The court found no errors of law or procedural fairness violations in the Board's decision. The tenant was ordered to pay $2,500 in costs to the landlord.

Unlock Order Content

Dispute

Tenant appealed a Landlord and Tenant Board decision that summarily rejected her request for reconsideration of a consent order terminating her tenancy. The tenant argued that her mental health issues vitiated her consent to the order and that the Board failed to properly inquire into her capacity to consent.

Unlock Order Content

Determinations

  • No errors of law in Board's reconsideration decision
  • No violation of procedural fairness
  • Vice Chair properly applied Rules of Procedure
  • Tenant failed to establish grounds for interfering with consent order
  • Section 83 of RTA not independently applicable at reconsideration stage
  • Unlock Order Content

Landlord's Arguments

Arguments

Landlord argued that the Board's decision was correct and that there were no errors of law or procedural fairness violations.

Unlock Order Content

Actions and Evidence

Landlord agreed to provide tenant two extra months to leave the rental premises as part of a compromise.

Unlock Order Content

Tenant's Arguments

Arguments

Tenant argued that her mental health issues vitiated her consent to the order terminating her tenancy, that the Board failed to properly inquire into her capacity to consent, and that the Board failed to consider section 83 of the Residential Tenancies Act.

Unlock Order Content

Actions and Evidence

Tenant agreed to leave the rental premises with two extra months to do so in a compromise with the landlord.

Unlock Order Content

Need assistance from an expert?

Similar Cases

Click to switch between order outcomes

Heubner v Dewe-Boucher

Contested Dispute
Landlord Wins
March 12, 2025
Cornwall

Cornwall tenant faces eviction for $11,391 in non-payment of rent.

Section 82 Issues Raised and Denied
ContentionModerate

Zetchaku v Hazelview Property Services Inc

Contested Dispute
Landlord Wins
March 5, 2025
Toronto

LTB dismisses tenant's maintenance complaint against Toronto landlord, finding reasonable response to issues.

ContentionLow

16127720 Canada Inc. v Stevens

Contested Dispute
Landlord Wins

Landlord granted eviction order against tenant who caused damage and safety issues at residential complex.

Eviction Relief Granted
ContentionHigh

MM Nominee Corp. v Oba

Contested Dispute
Landlord Wins
February 21, 2025
North York

Landlord wins non-payment case, but tenant granted conditional relief from eviction to repay $4,589.97 in arrears.

Eviction Relief Granted
Section 82 Issues Raised and Denied
ContentionModerate

Heubner v Dewe-Boucher

Contested Dispute
Landlord Wins
March 12, 2025
Cornwall

Cornwall tenant faces eviction for $11,391 in non-payment of rent.

Section 82 Issues Raised and Denied
ContentionModerate

Zetchaku v Hazelview Property Services Inc

Contested Dispute
Landlord Wins
March 5, 2025
Toronto

LTB dismisses tenant's maintenance complaint against Toronto landlord, finding reasonable response to issues.

ContentionLow

16127720 Canada Inc. v Stevens

Contested Dispute
Landlord Wins

Landlord granted eviction order against tenant who caused damage and safety issues at residential complex.

Eviction Relief Granted
ContentionHigh

MM Nominee Corp. v Oba

Contested Dispute
Landlord Wins
February 21, 2025
North York

Landlord wins non-payment case, but tenant granted conditional relief from eviction to repay $4,589.97 in arrears.

Eviction Relief Granted
Section 82 Issues Raised and Denied
ContentionModerate

Unlock More Similar Orders

Access our complete database of similar cases to make more informed decisions and better understand LTB rulings.

Compare outcomes of similar cases to assess your position

Analyze patterns in LTB decisions for your case type

Build stronger arguments with real case references

Share: