Skyline Living v Dedominicis - LTB Ruling on Superintendent's Premises Termination
LTB orders Sault Ste. Marie tenant to vacate superintendent's premises after employment ends, pay $19489 to landlord
Summarized by RentZenLast updated: November 3, 2024
Case Summary
701 MacDonald Ave, Sault Ste. Marie, ON P6B6A7
Decision in favor of
landlord
Balance Owed to Landlord
$19,489
Dispute Categories
Subsections of RTA Quoted
Agree with the ruling?
Timeline
Application Date
May 2023
Hearing Date
Apr 2024
Order Date
Jul 17, 2024
Tenancy End Date
Aug 2024
Dispute Summary
Landlord applied for an order to terminate the tenancy and evict the Tenant because the rental unit is the superintendent's premises and the Tenant's employment as superintendent has ended.
Determinations
- Landlord has proven grounds for termination of tenancy
- Landlord entitled to compensation for use of unit
- Parties agreed on termination date of May 20, 2024
- Tenant to vacate by May 20, 2024
- Rent increased to $1,630.77 effective January 1, 2024
- Tenant does not dispute rent increase
Arguments and Actions
Tenant
Actions
Tenant is partially moved out, has difficulty finding employment, and has no source of income.
Decision Summary
The Landlord has proven the grounds for termination of the tenancy and the claim for compensation. The tenancy will terminate on August 6, 2024, and the Tenant must pay the Landlord $19,488.76, which includes compensation for use of the unit and the application filing fee. If the Tenant does not pay the full amount by July 31, 2024, interest will start accruing at 7% annually on the outstanding balance.
Adjudicator Details
LTB Member
Total Orders
12
Landlord Favorable
91.7%
Tenant Favorable
8.3%
Mutual Agreement
0.0%
Need assistance from an expert?
Sponsored
Financial Details
Lawful Rent
$1,631
Rent Arrears
$19,303
Application Fee
$186
Total Owing
$19,489 (Owed to Landlord)
Source
Similar Cases
Click to switch between case outcomes
Sripathy v Chilvers
Waterdown landlords regain possession of rental unit for personal use, tenant must vacate by January 31, 2025.
Singh v Gray
LTB upholds consent order terminating tenancy for non-payment of rent in Toronto.
Yassin v Smith
Pickering tenant faces potential eviction after dispute over rent increase and arrears
Hazelview Property Services Inc. v Fatemi
Toronto tenant evicted for non-payment of rent, owes $8,938.24 to landlord.
Sripathy v Chilvers
Waterdown landlords regain possession of rental unit for personal use, tenant must vacate by January 31, 2025.
Singh v Gray
LTB upholds consent order terminating tenancy for non-payment of rent in Toronto.
Yassin v Smith
Pickering tenant faces potential eviction after dispute over rent increase and arrears
Hazelview Property Services Inc. v Fatemi
Toronto tenant evicted for non-payment of rent, owes $8,938.24 to landlord.
Sripathy v Chilvers
Waterdown landlords regain possession of rental unit for personal use, tenant must vacate by January 31, 2025.
Singh v Gray
LTB upholds consent order terminating tenancy for non-payment of rent in Toronto.
Yassin v Smith
Pickering tenant faces potential eviction after dispute over rent increase and arrears
Hazelview Property Services Inc. v Fatemi
Toronto tenant evicted for non-payment of rent, owes $8,938.24 to landlord.
Sripathy v Chilvers
Waterdown landlords regain possession of rental unit for personal use, tenant must vacate by January 31, 2025.
Singh v Gray
LTB upholds consent order terminating tenancy for non-payment of rent in Toronto.
Yassin v Smith
Pickering tenant faces potential eviction after dispute over rent increase and arrears
Hazelview Property Services Inc. v Fatemi
Toronto tenant evicted for non-payment of rent, owes $8,938.24 to landlord.
Goklani v Cannata
Toronto tenants' maintenance dispute against landlord dismissed by LTB
Jeff v Ferguson
Woodstock landlords awarded $35,186 in rent arrears, tenants face eviction for non-payment.
Oxford Properties Group v Benjamin
Tenant ordered to pay $22,461.70 for flood damage with conditional tenancy preservation
Sufi Properties Ltd v Nieman
Tenants ordered to pay $16,866 in rent arrears to Former Landlord after complex dispute.