Landlord Wins Damage Dispute: Shazia Nafees v Singh 2024
Brampton landlord awarded $6136 for tenant damage to rental property
Summarized by RentZenLast updated: November 3, 2024
Case Summary
63 New Pines Trail, Brampton, ON L6Z0H6
Decision in favor of
landlord
Balance Owed to Landlord
$6,136
Dispute Categories
Subsections of RTA Quoted
Agree with the ruling?
Timeline
Application Date
Dec 2023
Tenancy End Date
Apr 2024
Hearing Date
May 2024
Order Date
Jul 8, 2024
Dispute Summary
Landlord applied for an order to terminate the tenancy and evict Tenants due to wilful or negligent damage to the rental unit and residential complex. The Landlord also claimed compensation for the costs to repair or replace the damaged property.
Determinations
- Tenant was in possession on application date
- Tenant vacated on 2024-04-27
- Landlord proved Tenant caused undue damage
- Landlord's repair estimates and receipts reasonable
Arguments and Actions
Tenant
Actions
Tenants caused undue damage to the rental unit, including damage to the walls, floors, smoke detectors, and thermostat.
Decision Summary
The Landlord proved the Tenant caused undue damage to the rental unit. The Tenant is ordered to pay the Landlord $6,136, which includes $5,950 for the reasonable costs of repairing the damage and replacing the damaged property, and $186 for the application filing fee.
Adjudicator Details
LTB Member
Total Orders
27
Landlord Favorable
74.1%
Tenant Favorable
22.2%
Mutual Agreement
3.7%
Need assistance from an expert?
Sponsored
Financial Details
Application Fee
$186
Damages
$5,950
Total Owing
$6,136 (Owed to Landlord)
Source
Similar Cases
Click to switch between case outcomes
Sripathy v Chilvers
Waterdown landlords regain possession of rental unit for personal use, tenant must vacate by January 31, 2025.
Singh v Gray
LTB upholds consent order terminating tenancy for non-payment of rent in Toronto.
Yassin v Smith
Pickering tenant faces potential eviction after dispute over rent increase and arrears
Hazelview Property Services Inc. v Fatemi
Toronto tenant evicted for non-payment of rent, owes $8,938.24 to landlord.
Sripathy v Chilvers
Waterdown landlords regain possession of rental unit for personal use, tenant must vacate by January 31, 2025.
Singh v Gray
LTB upholds consent order terminating tenancy for non-payment of rent in Toronto.
Yassin v Smith
Pickering tenant faces potential eviction after dispute over rent increase and arrears
Hazelview Property Services Inc. v Fatemi
Toronto tenant evicted for non-payment of rent, owes $8,938.24 to landlord.
Sripathy v Chilvers
Waterdown landlords regain possession of rental unit for personal use, tenant must vacate by January 31, 2025.
Singh v Gray
LTB upholds consent order terminating tenancy for non-payment of rent in Toronto.
Yassin v Smith
Pickering tenant faces potential eviction after dispute over rent increase and arrears
Hazelview Property Services Inc. v Fatemi
Toronto tenant evicted for non-payment of rent, owes $8,938.24 to landlord.
Sripathy v Chilvers
Waterdown landlords regain possession of rental unit for personal use, tenant must vacate by January 31, 2025.
Singh v Gray
LTB upholds consent order terminating tenancy for non-payment of rent in Toronto.
Yassin v Smith
Pickering tenant faces potential eviction after dispute over rent increase and arrears
Hazelview Property Services Inc. v Fatemi
Toronto tenant evicted for non-payment of rent, owes $8,938.24 to landlord.
Goklani v Cannata
Toronto tenants' maintenance dispute against landlord dismissed by LTB
Jeff v Ferguson
Woodstock landlords awarded $35,186 in rent arrears, tenants face eviction for non-payment.
Oxford Properties Group v Benjamin
Tenant ordered to pay $22,461.70 for flood damage with conditional tenancy preservation
Sufi Properties Ltd v Nieman
Tenants ordered to pay $16,866 in rent arrears to Former Landlord after complex dispute.