RentZen LogoRentZen
Thanksgiving Sale30% offLimited time offer

Sequeira v Schilcher

Last updated: October 12, 2026

Share:

Order

Order Date: July 30, 2026
Unit ***, 312 Morrish Road, Toronto, ON M1C1G1
Uncontested Dispute
Application L2Filed by LandlordDocument Order

Decision in favor of

Landlord

Subsections of RTA Quoted

ContentionLow

Agree with the ruling?

PDF provided by the Ontario LTB Order Catalogue

Citation: Sequeira v Schilcher, 2026 ONLTB 58730, LTB-L-033265-26

File Number: LTB-L-033265-26

Timeline

Tenancy End Date

May 2026

25 days

Hearing Date

May 2026

2 months

Order Date

Jul 30, 2026

Decision

The LTB determined that the tenancy was terminated on May 3, 2026, as the Tenant had already vacated the rental unit, rendering the Landlords' eviction application moot.

Unlock Order Content

Dispute

The Landlords applied to terminate the tenancy and evict the Tenant due to an alleged illegal act. The Tenant did not attend the hearing, and the Landlords reported that the Tenant had already moved out and the tenancy was terminated on May 3, 2026.

Unlock Order Content

Determinations

  • The Landlords say that the tenancy was terminated on May 3, 2026, and the Tenant has moved out of the rental unit.
  • As the tenancy has been terminated, the Landlords’ application to terminate the tenancy and evict the Tenant is moot.
  • Unlock Order Content

Landlord's Arguments

Actions and Evidence

The Landlords attended the hearing and stated that the tenancy was terminated on May 3, 2026, after the Tenant moved out.

Unlock Order Content

Considerations

Unlock Order Content

Tenant's Arguments

Considerations

Unlock Order Content

Need assistance from an expert?

Professional business person

Reach Landlords & Tenants

Advertise your legal or rental services to our audience

Sponsored

Similar Cases

Click to switch between order outcomes

Toronto Community Housing Corporation v Palacios

Contested Dispute
Landlord Wins

The LTB found that an unauthorized occupant committed illegal acts and impaired safety at the residential complex, but granted the Tenant conditional relief from eviction.

Landlord Aggravating Factor
Tenant Aggravating Factor
Testimony Contested
Eviction Relief Granted
ContentionExtreme

Saickley Enterprises Ltd. v Holst

Contested Dispute
Landlord Wins
July 31, 2026
Ottawa

The LTB terminated the tenancy and ordered eviction based on an unfulfilled agreement to terminate, requiring the tenant to pay the filing fee.

Landlord Aggravating Factor
Tenant Aggravating Factor
ContentionLow

Singh and Thind Holding Inc. v Boyd

Contested Dispute
Landlord Wins
July 31, 2026
Review Order

The LTB denied a tenant's review request of a consent termination order, finding no serious error or valid grounds to overturn the agreement despite changed financial circumstances.

Landlord Aggravating Factor
Tenant Aggravating Factor
ContentionModerate

Maebrook Rideau Inc. v Hiyadi

Contested Dispute
Landlord Wins

The Landlord was granted an order terminating the tenancy and requiring the Tenant to pay rent arrears following the Tenant's departure from the unit.

Landlord Aggravating Factor
Tenant Aggravating Factor
ContentionLow

Toronto Community Housing Corporation v Palacios

Contested Dispute
Landlord Wins

The LTB found that an unauthorized occupant committed illegal acts and impaired safety at the residential complex, but granted the Tenant conditional relief from eviction.

Landlord Aggravating Factor
Tenant Aggravating Factor
Testimony Contested
Eviction Relief Granted
ContentionExtreme

Saickley Enterprises Ltd. v Holst

Contested Dispute
Landlord Wins
July 31, 2026
Ottawa

The LTB terminated the tenancy and ordered eviction based on an unfulfilled agreement to terminate, requiring the tenant to pay the filing fee.

Landlord Aggravating Factor
Tenant Aggravating Factor
ContentionLow

Singh and Thind Holding Inc. v Boyd

Contested Dispute
Landlord Wins
July 31, 2026
Review Order

The LTB denied a tenant's review request of a consent termination order, finding no serious error or valid grounds to overturn the agreement despite changed financial circumstances.

Landlord Aggravating Factor
Tenant Aggravating Factor
ContentionModerate

Maebrook Rideau Inc. v Hiyadi

Contested Dispute
Landlord Wins

The Landlord was granted an order terminating the tenancy and requiring the Tenant to pay rent arrears following the Tenant's departure from the unit.

Landlord Aggravating Factor
Tenant Aggravating Factor
ContentionLow

Unlock More Similar Orders

Access our complete database of similar cases to make more informed decisions and better understand LTB rulings.

Compare outcomes of similar cases to assess your position

Analyze patterns in LTB decisions for your case type

Build stronger arguments with real case references

Share:

Latest Insights from Our Blog

Stay informed with expert analysis on rental law, tenant rights, and LTB decisions

Need Legal Help? We've Got You Covered

Whether you need to find qualified legal professionals or post your specific legal needs to get competitive quotes, our platform connects you with the right help.

Find Legal Professionals

Browse our directory of verified paralegals and lawyers specializing in Ontario rental law and LTB matters.

Browse Professionals

Post Your Legal Needs

Describe your legal situation and receive competitive quotes from qualified professionals in our marketplace.

Post a Bounty

Join thousands of Ontarians who have found legal help through our platform