Landlords Win Rent Dispute: Seema Sankarsigngh v Ammar Aidak 2023
Landlords awarded $186 in filing fees after tenant fails to void N4 notice in Peterborough rent dispute
Summarized by RentZenLast updated: September 12, 2024
Case Summary
788 Broadway Blvd, Peterborough, ON K9H0H7
Decision in favor of
landlord
Balance Owed to Landlords
$186
Dispute Categories
Notices Sent
Agree with the ruling?
Timeline
Application Date
Dec 2022
Hearing Date
Apr 2023
Order Date
May 9, 2023
Dispute Summary
The Landlords applied for an order to terminate the tenancy and evict the Tenant because the Tenant did not pay the rent that the Tenant owes.
Determinations
- Landlords served valid N4 Notice
- Tenant did not void notice by paying arrears
- Tenant in possession on application date
- Tenant arrears paid in full
- Landlords incurred $186.00 in filing costs
Case Study
The Landlords served the Tenant with a valid N4 Notice. The Tenant did not void the notice by paying the rent arrears. The Tenant was still in possession of the rental unit at the time of the hearing. The parties agreed that the Tenant's arrears have been paid in full. The Landlords are entitled to reimbursement of the application filing fee of $186.00 as the Tenant agreed the rent was late when the application was filed.
Arguments and Actions
Tenant
Actions
Tenant states the reason the rent was late was because they had lost their job.
Decision Summary
The Tenant shall pay the Landlords $186.00 for the cost of filing the application. If the Tenant does not pay the full amount by May 20, 2023, the Tenant will start to owe interest at 6.00% annually on the outstanding balance.
Adjudicator Details
LTB Member
Total Orders
602
Landlord Favorable
88.0%
Tenant Favorable
6.2%
Mutual Agreement
5.8%
Need assistance from an expert?
Sponsored
Financial Details
Application Fee
$186
Total Owing
$186 (Owed to Landlords)
Source
Similar Cases
Click to switch between case outcomes
Sripathy v Chilvers
Waterdown landlords regain possession of rental unit for personal use, tenant must vacate by January 31, 2025.
Singh v Gray
LTB upholds consent order terminating tenancy for non-payment of rent in Toronto.
Yassin v Smith
Pickering tenant faces potential eviction after dispute over rent increase and arrears
Hazelview Property Services Inc. v Fatemi
Toronto tenant evicted for non-payment of rent, owes $8,938.24 to landlord.
Sripathy v Chilvers
Waterdown landlords regain possession of rental unit for personal use, tenant must vacate by January 31, 2025.
Singh v Gray
LTB upholds consent order terminating tenancy for non-payment of rent in Toronto.
Yassin v Smith
Pickering tenant faces potential eviction after dispute over rent increase and arrears
Hazelview Property Services Inc. v Fatemi
Toronto tenant evicted for non-payment of rent, owes $8,938.24 to landlord.
Sripathy v Chilvers
Waterdown landlords regain possession of rental unit for personal use, tenant must vacate by January 31, 2025.
Singh v Gray
LTB upholds consent order terminating tenancy for non-payment of rent in Toronto.
Yassin v Smith
Pickering tenant faces potential eviction after dispute over rent increase and arrears
Hazelview Property Services Inc. v Fatemi
Toronto tenant evicted for non-payment of rent, owes $8,938.24 to landlord.
Sripathy v Chilvers
Waterdown landlords regain possession of rental unit for personal use, tenant must vacate by January 31, 2025.
Singh v Gray
LTB upholds consent order terminating tenancy for non-payment of rent in Toronto.
Yassin v Smith
Pickering tenant faces potential eviction after dispute over rent increase and arrears
Hazelview Property Services Inc. v Fatemi
Toronto tenant evicted for non-payment of rent, owes $8,938.24 to landlord.
Goklani v Cannata
Toronto tenants' maintenance dispute against landlord dismissed by LTB
Jeff v Ferguson
Woodstock landlords awarded $35,186 in rent arrears, tenants face eviction for non-payment.
Oxford Properties Group v Benjamin
Tenant ordered to pay $22,461.70 for flood damage with conditional tenancy preservation
Sufi Properties Ltd v Nieman
Tenants ordered to pay $16,866 in rent arrears to Former Landlord after complex dispute.