Sanati v Toffoletto

Last updated: September 12, 2024

Order

Ordered by Susan Priest,Tribunals Ontario  under Section 69, Residential Tenancies Act 2006

Order Date: May 14, 2024
Unit ***, 204 Harrison Dr, Newmarket, ON L3Y6B9
Contested Dispute
Review Order

Decision in favor of

Landlord

Previous Order

Overturned

Dispute Categories

Notices Sent

Non-payment of rent (N4)
ContentionHigh

Agree with the ruling?

Citation: Sanati v Toffoletto, 2024 ONLTB 34031

File Number: LTB-L-063033-23-RV

Timeline

Application Date

Dec 2023

4 months

Hearing Date

Apr 2024

19 days

Order Date

May 14, 2024

17 days

Tenancy End Date

May 2024

Decision

The tenancy is terminated unless the Tenant pays $21,636 to void the order by May 31, 2024. If the Tenant does not void the order, they must vacate the unit by May 31, 2024 and pay the Landlord $17,979.87, plus daily compensation of $54.25 from April 26, 2024 until the move-out date.

Unlock Order Content

Reason for Eviction Relief

Considering the Tenant's health issues and lack of income, the eviction was postponed until May 31, 2024.

Unlock Order Content

Dispute

Landlord applied for an order to terminate the tenancy and evict Tenant due to non-payment of rent. The Tenant requested a review of the previous order, alleging they were not reasonably able to participate at the hearing as they did not receive the notice of hearing.

Unlock Order Content

Determinations

  • Landlord served valid N4 Notice
  • Tenant did not void notice by paying arrears
  • Tenant still in possession on hearing date
  • Lawful rent is $1,650 per month
  • Tenant has not made any payments since application filed
  • Rent arrears owing to April 30, 2024 are $19,800
  • Landlord incurred $186 in application filing fees
  • Landlord holds $1,650 rent deposit and owes $62.38 in interest
  • Tenant not permitted to raise issues under section 82 due to lack of disclosure
  • Tenant has no income and cannot pay arrears or ongoing rent
  • Unlock Order Content

Landlord's Arguments

Arguments

Landlord's representative submitted that the Landlord is seeking a standard eviction order, as the rent arrears are substantial and the Tenant currently has no income to pay the arrears or ongoing rent.

Unlock Order Content

Tenant's Arguments

Actions and Evidence

Tenant testified they do not currently have any income as they are not working and cannot offer a repayment plan for the rent arrears. Tenant also testified they have been in and out of the hospital with numerous health issues.

Unlock Order Content

Procedural Errors

Tenant did not provide disclosure of the issues and evidence they wanted to raise under section 82 at least seven days prior to the hearing as required.

Unlock Order Content

Need assistance from an expert?

Financial Details

Lawful Rent

$1,650

Rent Arrears

$19,800

Application Fee

$186

Rent Deposit

$1,650

Deposit Interest

$62

Ordered Amount

$21,636 (to Landlord)

Similar Cases

Click to switch between order outcomes

Heubner v Dewe-Boucher

Contested Dispute
Landlord Wins
March 12, 2025
Cornwall

Cornwall tenant faces eviction for $11,391 in non-payment of rent.

Section 82 Issues Raised and Denied
ContentionModerate

Zetchaku v Hazelview Property Services Inc

Contested Dispute
Landlord Wins
March 5, 2025
Toronto

LTB dismisses tenant's maintenance complaint against Toronto landlord, finding reasonable response to issues.

ContentionLow

16127720 Canada Inc. v Stevens

Contested Dispute
Landlord Wins

Landlord granted eviction order against tenant who caused damage and safety issues at residential complex.

Eviction Relief Granted
ContentionHigh

MM Nominee Corp. v Oba

Contested Dispute
Landlord Wins
February 21, 2025
North York

Landlord wins non-payment case, but tenant granted conditional relief from eviction to repay $4,589.97 in arrears.

Eviction Relief Granted
Section 82 Issues Raised and Denied
ContentionModerate

Heubner v Dewe-Boucher

Contested Dispute
Landlord Wins
March 12, 2025
Cornwall

Cornwall tenant faces eviction for $11,391 in non-payment of rent.

Section 82 Issues Raised and Denied
ContentionModerate

Zetchaku v Hazelview Property Services Inc

Contested Dispute
Landlord Wins
March 5, 2025
Toronto

LTB dismisses tenant's maintenance complaint against Toronto landlord, finding reasonable response to issues.

ContentionLow

16127720 Canada Inc. v Stevens

Contested Dispute
Landlord Wins

Landlord granted eviction order against tenant who caused damage and safety issues at residential complex.

Eviction Relief Granted
ContentionHigh

MM Nominee Corp. v Oba

Contested Dispute
Landlord Wins
February 21, 2025
North York

Landlord wins non-payment case, but tenant granted conditional relief from eviction to repay $4,589.97 in arrears.

Eviction Relief Granted
Section 82 Issues Raised and Denied
ContentionModerate

Unlock More Similar Orders

Access our complete database of similar cases to make more informed decisions and better understand LTB rulings.

Compare outcomes of similar cases to assess your position

Analyze patterns in LTB decisions for your case type

Build stronger arguments with real case references

Share: