Robinson v Waidyatilake

Last updated: March 4, 2025

Order

Ordered by Camille Tancioco,Tribunals Ontario  under Section 31, Residential Tenancies Act, 2006

Order Date: December 13, 2024
*** Wilsonview, Guelph, ON N1G4E3
Contested Dispute

Dispute resolved in

Agreement

Ordered Amount

$4,217

to Tenants

Notices Sent

Personal use (N12)

Subsections of RTA Quoted

222357(1)(b)
ContentionHigh

Agree with the ruling?

Citation: Robinson v Waidyatilake, 2024 ONLTB 92417

File Number: LTB-T-064762-22 LTB-T-064899-22

Timeline

Application Date

Dec 2022

24 months

Hearing Date

Dec 2024

7 days

Order Date

Dec 13, 2024

Decision

The Tenants' T5 application was dismissed as they did not prove the Landlords served a notice of termination under the Act. However, the Tenants' T2 application was granted in part. The Landlords' notice to vacate without a lawful reason substantially interfered with the Tenants' reasonable enjoyment. The Landlords were ordered to pay the Tenants $4,217.46 for rent abatement, rent differential, and moving/storage expenses.

Unlock Order Content

Dispute

Tenants applied for orders determining that the Landlords gave a notice of termination in bad faith and substantially interfered with their reasonable enjoyment of the rental unit.

Unlock Order Content

Determinations

  • Landlords did not serve a valid N12 notice
  • Landlords' correspondence was not a proper notice to vacate
  • Landlords' actions substantially interfered with Tenants' reasonable enjoyment
  • Unlock Order Content

Landlord's Arguments

Actions and Evidence

Landlords sent notice to vacate in 30-60 days, listed unit for sale, and showed unit to 26 people in 11 days.

Unlock Order Content

Tenant's Arguments

Actions and Evidence

Tenants had to pack away some items and leave the unit during showings.

Unlock Order Content

Need assistance from an expert?

Financial Details

Lawful Rent

$2,100

Application Fee

$53

Ordered Amount

$4,217 (to Tenants)

Similar Cases

Click to switch between order outcomes

Heubner v Dewe-Boucher

Contested Dispute
Landlord Wins
March 12, 2025
Cornwall

Cornwall tenant faces eviction for $11,391 in non-payment of rent.

Section 82 Issues Raised and Denied
ContentionModerate

Zetchaku v Hazelview Property Services Inc

Contested Dispute
Landlord Wins
March 5, 2025
Toronto

LTB dismisses tenant's maintenance complaint against Toronto landlord, finding reasonable response to issues.

ContentionLow

16127720 Canada Inc. v Stevens

Contested Dispute
Landlord Wins

Landlord granted eviction order against tenant who caused damage and safety issues at residential complex.

Eviction Relief Granted
ContentionHigh

MM Nominee Corp. v Oba

Contested Dispute
Landlord Wins
February 21, 2025
North York

Landlord wins non-payment case, but tenant granted conditional relief from eviction to repay $4,589.97 in arrears.

Eviction Relief Granted
Section 82 Issues Raised and Denied
ContentionModerate

Heubner v Dewe-Boucher

Contested Dispute
Landlord Wins
March 12, 2025
Cornwall

Cornwall tenant faces eviction for $11,391 in non-payment of rent.

Section 82 Issues Raised and Denied
ContentionModerate

Zetchaku v Hazelview Property Services Inc

Contested Dispute
Landlord Wins
March 5, 2025
Toronto

LTB dismisses tenant's maintenance complaint against Toronto landlord, finding reasonable response to issues.

ContentionLow

16127720 Canada Inc. v Stevens

Contested Dispute
Landlord Wins

Landlord granted eviction order against tenant who caused damage and safety issues at residential complex.

Eviction Relief Granted
ContentionHigh

MM Nominee Corp. v Oba

Contested Dispute
Landlord Wins
February 21, 2025
North York

Landlord wins non-payment case, but tenant granted conditional relief from eviction to repay $4,589.97 in arrears.

Eviction Relief Granted
Section 82 Issues Raised and Denied
ContentionModerate

Unlock More Similar Orders

Access our complete database of similar cases to make more informed decisions and better understand LTB rulings.

Compare outcomes of similar cases to assess your position

Analyze patterns in LTB decisions for your case type

Build stronger arguments with real case references

Share: