Ravine Development GP Inc. v Khandan

Last updated: March 4, 2025

Order

Ordered by Alexandre Traboulsi,Tribunals Ontario  under Section 69, Residential Tenancies Act, 2006

Order Date: January 13, 2025
*** Deerlick Crt North, North York, ON M3A0A7
Uncontested Dispute

Decision in favor of

Landlord

Ordered Amount

$16,358

to Landlord

Notices Sent

N8 Notice of Termination

Subsections of RTA Quoted

58(1)(4)
ContentionModerate

Agree with the ruling?

Citation: Ravine Development GP Inc. v Khandan, 2025 ONLTB 2793

File Number: LTB-L-055241-24

Timeline

Hearing Date

Dec 2024

28 days

Order Date

Jan 13, 2025

2 months

Tenancy End Date

Feb 2025

Decision

The tenancy between the Landlord and the Tenant is terminated. The Tenant must move out of the rental unit on or before February 28, 2025. The Tenant shall pay the Landlord $16,358.47, which includes daily compensation for use and occupation of the unit, bank charges, and application filing fees. If the Tenant does not pay the full amount by February 28, 2025, the Tenant will start to owe interest at 5% annually on the outstanding balance.

Unlock Order Content

Reason for Eviction Relief

The Landlord was willing to delay the eviction by 30 days as they consider the Tenant an elderly person.

Unlock Order Content

Dispute

Landlord applied for an order to terminate the tenancy and evict Tenant because the tenancy was entered into as a result of an agreement to purchase the condominium unit and the agreement has been terminated due to Tenant's failure to pay occupancy fees.

Unlock Order Content

Determinations

  • Landlord served valid N8 Notice
  • Tenancy arose from agreement of purchase and sale
  • Agreement of purchase and sale terminated due to Tenant's failure to pay occupancy fees
  • Tenant in possession on application date
  • Unlock Order Content

Landlord's Arguments

Tenant's Arguments

Need assistance from an expert?

Financial Details

Application Fee

$186

Other Amount

$16,072

Daily compensation for use and occupation of the rental unit from September 1, 2024 to December 16, 2024

Ordered Amount

$16,358 (to Landlord)

Similar Cases

Click to switch between order outcomes

Heubner v Dewe-Boucher

Contested Dispute
Landlord Wins
March 12, 2025
Cornwall

Cornwall tenant faces eviction for $11,391 in non-payment of rent.

Section 82 Issues Raised and Denied
ContentionModerate

Zetchaku v Hazelview Property Services Inc

Contested Dispute
Landlord Wins
March 5, 2025
Toronto

LTB dismisses tenant's maintenance complaint against Toronto landlord, finding reasonable response to issues.

ContentionLow

16127720 Canada Inc. v Stevens

Contested Dispute
Landlord Wins

Landlord granted eviction order against tenant who caused damage and safety issues at residential complex.

Eviction Relief Granted
ContentionHigh

MM Nominee Corp. v Oba

Contested Dispute
Landlord Wins
February 21, 2025
North York

Landlord wins non-payment case, but tenant granted conditional relief from eviction to repay $4,589.97 in arrears.

Eviction Relief Granted
Section 82 Issues Raised and Denied
ContentionModerate

Heubner v Dewe-Boucher

Contested Dispute
Landlord Wins
March 12, 2025
Cornwall

Cornwall tenant faces eviction for $11,391 in non-payment of rent.

Section 82 Issues Raised and Denied
ContentionModerate

Zetchaku v Hazelview Property Services Inc

Contested Dispute
Landlord Wins
March 5, 2025
Toronto

LTB dismisses tenant's maintenance complaint against Toronto landlord, finding reasonable response to issues.

ContentionLow

16127720 Canada Inc. v Stevens

Contested Dispute
Landlord Wins

Landlord granted eviction order against tenant who caused damage and safety issues at residential complex.

Eviction Relief Granted
ContentionHigh

MM Nominee Corp. v Oba

Contested Dispute
Landlord Wins
February 21, 2025
North York

Landlord wins non-payment case, but tenant granted conditional relief from eviction to repay $4,589.97 in arrears.

Eviction Relief Granted
Section 82 Issues Raised and Denied
ContentionModerate

Unlock More Similar Orders

Access our complete database of similar cases to make more informed decisions and better understand LTB rulings.

Compare outcomes of similar cases to assess your position

Analyze patterns in LTB decisions for your case type

Build stronger arguments with real case references

Share: