Pinedale Properties Ltd. v Dhakecha

Last updated: September 12, 2024

Order

Ordered by Susan Priest,Tribunals Ontario  under Section 69, Residential Tenancies Act 2006

Order Date: November 9, 2023
*** Crescent Place, Toronto, ON M4C5L8
Contested Dispute

Decision in favor of

Landlord

Ordered Amount

$79,832

to Landlord

Dispute Categories

ContentionHigh

Agree with the ruling?

Citation: Pinedale Properties Ltd. v Dhakecha, 2023 ONLTB 72526

File Number: LTB-L-068038-22

Timeline

Application Date

Dec 2022

7 months

Hearing Date

Jul 2023

4 months

Order Date

Nov 9, 2023

11 days

Tenancy End Date

Nov 2023

Decision

The tenancy between the Landlord and Tenant is terminated. The Unauthorized Occupants must move out of the rental unit by November 20, 2023. The Unauthorized Occupants must pay the Landlord $35,201.00, which includes $35,000.00 in daily compensation for use and occupation of the rental unit and $201.00 for the cost of filing the application.

Unlock Order Content

Dispute

Landlord applied for an order to terminate the tenancy of Tenant and evict Unauthorized Occupants because the Tenant transferred occupancy of the rental unit to the Unauthorized Occupants without the Landlord's consent.

Unlock Order Content

Determinations

  • Unauthorized Occupants were in possession of the rental unit on the date the application was filed
  • Lawful monthly rent amounts for different periods
  • Tenant moved out in January 2018 and allowed Unauthorized Occupants to move in
  • Tenant did not ensure proper paperwork was provided to Landlord
  • Unauthorized Occupants' method of obtaining rental unit was made in bad faith
  • Relief from eviction under s.83(1) would be unfair
  • Unlock Order Content

Landlord's Arguments

Tenant's Arguments

Actions and Evidence

Tenant trusted Unauthorized Occupants to handle the proper paperwork with Landlord, but they did not.

Unlock Order Content

Need assistance from an expert?

Financial Details

Rent Arrears

$44,631

Application Fee

$201

Other Amount

$35,000

Daily compensation for use and occupation of rental unit

Ordered Amount

$79,832 (to Landlord)

Similar Cases

Click to switch between order outcomes

Heubner v Dewe-Boucher

Contested Dispute
Landlord Wins
March 12, 2025
Cornwall

Cornwall tenant faces eviction for $11,391 in non-payment of rent.

Section 82 Issues Raised and Denied
ContentionModerate

Zetchaku v Hazelview Property Services Inc

Contested Dispute
Landlord Wins
March 5, 2025
Toronto

LTB dismisses tenant's maintenance complaint against Toronto landlord, finding reasonable response to issues.

ContentionLow

16127720 Canada Inc. v Stevens

Contested Dispute
Landlord Wins

Landlord granted eviction order against tenant who caused damage and safety issues at residential complex.

Eviction Relief Granted
ContentionHigh

MM Nominee Corp. v Oba

Contested Dispute
Landlord Wins
February 21, 2025
North York

Landlord wins non-payment case, but tenant granted conditional relief from eviction to repay $4,589.97 in arrears.

Eviction Relief Granted
Section 82 Issues Raised and Denied
ContentionModerate

Heubner v Dewe-Boucher

Contested Dispute
Landlord Wins
March 12, 2025
Cornwall

Cornwall tenant faces eviction for $11,391 in non-payment of rent.

Section 82 Issues Raised and Denied
ContentionModerate

Zetchaku v Hazelview Property Services Inc

Contested Dispute
Landlord Wins
March 5, 2025
Toronto

LTB dismisses tenant's maintenance complaint against Toronto landlord, finding reasonable response to issues.

ContentionLow

16127720 Canada Inc. v Stevens

Contested Dispute
Landlord Wins

Landlord granted eviction order against tenant who caused damage and safety issues at residential complex.

Eviction Relief Granted
ContentionHigh

MM Nominee Corp. v Oba

Contested Dispute
Landlord Wins
February 21, 2025
North York

Landlord wins non-payment case, but tenant granted conditional relief from eviction to repay $4,589.97 in arrears.

Eviction Relief Granted
Section 82 Issues Raised and Denied
ContentionModerate

Unlock More Similar Orders

Access our complete database of similar cases to make more informed decisions and better understand LTB rulings.

Compare outcomes of similar cases to assess your position

Analyze patterns in LTB decisions for your case type

Build stronger arguments with real case references

Share: