Simplify rentals with instant tenant verification
Summarized by RentZenLast updated: August 16, 2024
Decision in favor of
tenant
Balance Owed
-
Agree with the ruling?
Hearing Date
May 2024
Order Date
May 9, 2024
The appellant, Mr. Osorio, appeals three orders of the Landlord and Tenant Board that found he was not a member of the respondent non-profit housing co-operative and ordered his eviction from the unit in the co-op. The appellant argues that the Board did not have jurisdiction to evict him, erred in determining he was not entitled to notice of the initial hearing, erred in finding he was not a member of the co-op, and erred in failing to consider whether his notice to resign his membership was valid.
The court found that the Board did not have jurisdiction to evict the appellant when it determined he was not a co-op member. The Residential Tenancies Act does not provide the Board with jurisdiction to evict an unauthorized occupant from a co-op. The court dismissed the appellant's other arguments, finding no merit in claims about notice entitlement, determination of co-op membership, and validity of membership resignation.
The respondent conceded that the Board did not have jurisdiction to evict the appellant when it found he was not a co-op member.
In March 2022, the co-op discovered the appellant's ex-spouse had moved out of the unit in February 2021. It also had information the appellant was living in the unit, but he had not applied to be reinstated as a member of the co-op.
The appellant argued that the Board lacked jurisdiction to evict him, erred in determining he was not entitled to notice of the initial hearing, erred in finding he was not a member of the co-op, and erred in failing to consider whether his notice to resign his membership was valid.
The appellant left the unit in approximately August 2011 due to a restraining order associated with domestic violence. In 2018, he provided written confirmation to the co-op that he had not resided in the unit since August 2011 and agreed to resign his membership.
The appeal is allowed. The Board's order terminating the appellant's occupancy and evicting him is quashed. The court found that the Landlord and Tenant Board did not have jurisdiction to evict the appellant once it determined he was not a member of the co-operative. The appellant's other grounds of appeal were dismissed.
Divisional Court
6
50.0%
50.0%
0.0%
Need assistance from an expert?
Sponsored
Click to switch between case outcomes
Waterdown landlords regain possession of rental unit for personal use, tenant must vacate by January 31, 2025.
LTB upholds consent order terminating tenancy for non-payment of rent in Toronto.
Pickering tenant faces potential eviction after dispute over rent increase and arrears
Toronto tenant evicted for non-payment of rent, owes $8,938.24 to landlord.
Waterdown landlords regain possession of rental unit for personal use, tenant must vacate by January 31, 2025.
LTB upholds consent order terminating tenancy for non-payment of rent in Toronto.
Pickering tenant faces potential eviction after dispute over rent increase and arrears
Toronto tenant evicted for non-payment of rent, owes $8,938.24 to landlord.
Waterdown landlords regain possession of rental unit for personal use, tenant must vacate by January 31, 2025.
LTB upholds consent order terminating tenancy for non-payment of rent in Toronto.
Pickering tenant faces potential eviction after dispute over rent increase and arrears
Toronto tenant evicted for non-payment of rent, owes $8,938.24 to landlord.
Waterdown landlords regain possession of rental unit for personal use, tenant must vacate by January 31, 2025.
LTB upholds consent order terminating tenancy for non-payment of rent in Toronto.
Pickering tenant faces potential eviction after dispute over rent increase and arrears
Toronto tenant evicted for non-payment of rent, owes $8,938.24 to landlord.
Toronto tenants' maintenance dispute against landlord dismissed by LTB
Woodstock landlords awarded $35,186 in rent arrears, tenants face eviction for non-payment.
Tenant ordered to pay $22,461.70 for flood damage with conditional tenancy preservation
Tenants ordered to pay $16,866 in rent arrears to Former Landlord after complex dispute.