Orchard Apartments (2503 -2507) LP v Azam - LTB Ruling on Tenant Damage
Landlord wins LTB case, tenant ordered to pay $1471 for property damage or face eviction
Summarized by RentZenLast updated: October 13, 2024
Case Summary
351 Hurontario Street, Mississauga, ON L5A2G7
Decision in favor of
landlord
Balance Owed to Landlord
$1,471
Dispute Categories
Notices Sent
Agree with the ruling?
Timeline
Application Date
Aug 2023
Hearing Date
Jul 2024
Order Date
Aug 26, 2024
Tenancy End Date
Sep 2024
Dispute Summary
Landlord applied to terminate the tenancy and evict the Tenant due to substantial interference and damage to the rental unit. The Landlord served an N5 notice alleging the Tenant was not cleaning the kitchen and washroom properly and had damaged kitchen drawers, a cabinet, and a medicine cabinet.
Determinations
- Landlord served valid N5 notice
- Tenant did not void notice by repairing damage
- Tenant or someone permitted by Tenant wilfully or negligently damaged property
- Cost to repair/replace damaged property is $1,270.00
- Landlord incurred $201.00 in filing costs
Decision Summary
The Landlord's application was granted in part. The tenancy will be terminated unless the Tenant pays $1,471.00 to the Landlord by September 30, 2024 to void the order. This amount covers the cost to repair the damaged property and the Landlord's application filing fee. If the Tenant does not pay, they must vacate the unit by September 30, 2024 and the Landlord can file the order with the Sheriff to enforce the eviction.
Reason for Eviction Relief
Tenant given opportunity to void termination by paying for damages
Adjudicator Details
LTB Member
Total Orders
929
Landlord Favorable
92.5%
Tenant Favorable
4.1%
Mutual Agreement
3.4%
Need assistance from an expert?
Sponsored
Financial Details
Application Fee
$201
Damages
$1,270
Total Owing
$1,471 (Owed to Landlord)
Source
Similar Cases
Click to switch between case outcomes
Sripathy v Chilvers
Waterdown landlords regain possession of rental unit for personal use, tenant must vacate by January 31, 2025.
Singh v Gray
LTB upholds consent order terminating tenancy for non-payment of rent in Toronto.
Yassin v Smith
Pickering tenant faces potential eviction after dispute over rent increase and arrears
Hazelview Property Services Inc. v Fatemi
Toronto tenant evicted for non-payment of rent, owes $8,938.24 to landlord.
Sripathy v Chilvers
Waterdown landlords regain possession of rental unit for personal use, tenant must vacate by January 31, 2025.
Singh v Gray
LTB upholds consent order terminating tenancy for non-payment of rent in Toronto.
Yassin v Smith
Pickering tenant faces potential eviction after dispute over rent increase and arrears
Hazelview Property Services Inc. v Fatemi
Toronto tenant evicted for non-payment of rent, owes $8,938.24 to landlord.
Sripathy v Chilvers
Waterdown landlords regain possession of rental unit for personal use, tenant must vacate by January 31, 2025.
Singh v Gray
LTB upholds consent order terminating tenancy for non-payment of rent in Toronto.
Yassin v Smith
Pickering tenant faces potential eviction after dispute over rent increase and arrears
Hazelview Property Services Inc. v Fatemi
Toronto tenant evicted for non-payment of rent, owes $8,938.24 to landlord.
Sripathy v Chilvers
Waterdown landlords regain possession of rental unit for personal use, tenant must vacate by January 31, 2025.
Singh v Gray
LTB upholds consent order terminating tenancy for non-payment of rent in Toronto.
Yassin v Smith
Pickering tenant faces potential eviction after dispute over rent increase and arrears
Hazelview Property Services Inc. v Fatemi
Toronto tenant evicted for non-payment of rent, owes $8,938.24 to landlord.
Goklani v Cannata
Toronto tenants' maintenance dispute against landlord dismissed by LTB
Jeff v Ferguson
Woodstock landlords awarded $35,186 in rent arrears, tenants face eviction for non-payment.
Oxford Properties Group v Benjamin
Tenant ordered to pay $22,461.70 for flood damage with conditional tenancy preservation
Sufi Properties Ltd v Nieman
Tenants ordered to pay $16,866 in rent arrears to Former Landlord after complex dispute.