Landlord Wins Persistent Late Payment Case: Nganothiam v Panchoo 2024
Brampton tenants evicted for persistent late rent payments, owe $26252 to landlord
Summarized by RentZenLast updated: October 13, 2024
Case Summary
5 Teston St, Brampton, ON L7A1P3
Decision in favor of
landlord
Balance Owed to Landlord
$26,252
Dispute Categories
Notices Sent
Agree with the ruling?
Timeline
Application Date
Sep 2023
Hearing Date
Jan 2024
Order Date
May 10, 2024
Tenancy End Date
Jun 2024
Dispute Summary
Landlords applied for an order to terminate the tenancy and evict Tenants due to persistent late payment of rent. The Landlords also claimed compensation for each day the Tenants remained in the unit after the termination date.
Determinations
- Landlords VN1 and KS meet the definition of landlord
- Tenants' request for adjournment denied
- Landlords proven persistent late payment of rent
- Landlords entitled to $186 for filing application fee
- Tenants owe $31,088.57 in compensation for use of unit
- Eviction postponed to June 9, 2024
- Landlords not proven Tenants failed to pay water costs
Arguments and Actions
Tenant
Actions
Tenants disputed they paid rent late, but could not provide documentation to support their position.
Decision Summary
The tenancy is terminated due to persistent late payment of rent. The Tenants must vacate the unit by June 9, 2024. The Tenants owe the Landlords $26,252.05, which includes compensation for use of the unit and the application filing fee. If the Tenants do not pay the full amount by June 9, 2024, they will owe interest at 7% annually on the outstanding balance.
Reason for Eviction Relief
Length of tenancy and medical condition of Tenant Camille Green
Adjudicator Details
LTB Member
Total Orders
85
Landlord Favorable
96.5%
Tenant Favorable
2.4%
Mutual Agreement
1.2%
Need assistance from an expert?
Sponsored
Financial Details
Lawful Rent
$4,800
Application Fee
$186
Rent Deposit
$4,800
Deposit Interest
$223
Total Owing
$26,252 (Owed to Landlord)
Source
Similar Cases
Click to switch between case outcomes
Sripathy v Chilvers
Waterdown landlords regain possession of rental unit for personal use, tenant must vacate by January 31, 2025.
Singh v Gray
LTB upholds consent order terminating tenancy for non-payment of rent in Toronto.
Yassin v Smith
Pickering tenant faces potential eviction after dispute over rent increase and arrears
Hazelview Property Services Inc. v Fatemi
Toronto tenant evicted for non-payment of rent, owes $8,938.24 to landlord.
Sripathy v Chilvers
Waterdown landlords regain possession of rental unit for personal use, tenant must vacate by January 31, 2025.
Singh v Gray
LTB upholds consent order terminating tenancy for non-payment of rent in Toronto.
Yassin v Smith
Pickering tenant faces potential eviction after dispute over rent increase and arrears
Hazelview Property Services Inc. v Fatemi
Toronto tenant evicted for non-payment of rent, owes $8,938.24 to landlord.
Sripathy v Chilvers
Waterdown landlords regain possession of rental unit for personal use, tenant must vacate by January 31, 2025.
Singh v Gray
LTB upholds consent order terminating tenancy for non-payment of rent in Toronto.
Yassin v Smith
Pickering tenant faces potential eviction after dispute over rent increase and arrears
Hazelview Property Services Inc. v Fatemi
Toronto tenant evicted for non-payment of rent, owes $8,938.24 to landlord.
Sripathy v Chilvers
Waterdown landlords regain possession of rental unit for personal use, tenant must vacate by January 31, 2025.
Singh v Gray
LTB upholds consent order terminating tenancy for non-payment of rent in Toronto.
Yassin v Smith
Pickering tenant faces potential eviction after dispute over rent increase and arrears
Hazelview Property Services Inc. v Fatemi
Toronto tenant evicted for non-payment of rent, owes $8,938.24 to landlord.
Goklani v Cannata
Toronto tenants' maintenance dispute against landlord dismissed by LTB
Jeff v Ferguson
Woodstock landlords awarded $35,186 in rent arrears, tenants face eviction for non-payment.
Oxford Properties Group v Benjamin
Tenant ordered to pay $22,461.70 for flood damage with conditional tenancy preservation
Sufi Properties Ltd v Nieman
Tenants ordered to pay $16,866 in rent arrears to Former Landlord after complex dispute.