METCAP LIVING MANAGEMENT INC. v Kevadiya: Rent Arrears and Eviction Case
Ottawa tenants face potential eviction for $13993 in unpaid rent and multiple NSF cheques
Summarized by RentZenLast updated: November 14, 2024
Case Summary
Unit ****, 2900 Carling Ave, Ottawa, ON K2B7J6
Decision in favor of
landlord
Balance Owed to Landlord
$12,367
Dispute Categories
Notices Sent
Subsections of RTA Quoted
Agree with the ruling?
Timeline
Application Date (Estimate)
Jul 2023
Hearing Date
Jan 2024
Order Date
Mar 11, 2024
Tenancy End Date
Mar 2024
We estimate Application Date using rent arrears.
Dispute Summary
Landlord applied for an order to terminate the tenancy and evict Tenants because they did not pay the rent owed. The Landlord also claimed charges related to NSF cheques.
Determinations
- Landlord served valid N4 Notice
- Tenants did not void notice by paying arrears
- Tenants still in possession of rental unit
- Lawful rent is $1,916.75 due on 1st of each month
- No payments made since application filed
Arguments and Actions
Landlord
Actions
Landlord filed application for non-payment of rent and NSF charges
Tenant
Actions
Tenants have not paid rent and have multiple NSF cheques
Decision Summary
Unless the Tenant voids the order by paying $18,163.25 by March 22, 2024, the tenancy will be terminated. If not voided, Tenants must pay $12,366.87 and vacate the unit, with daily compensation of $63.02 starting January 30, 2024.
Adjudicator Details
LTB Member
Total Orders
71
Landlord Favorable
80.3%
Tenant Favorable
11.3%
Mutual Agreement
8.4%
Need assistance from an expert?
Sponsored
Financial Details
Lawful Rent
$1,917
Rent Arrears
$13,905
Application Fee
$186
Rent Deposit
$1,870
Deposit Interest
$4
Other Owed Amount
$150
NSF Charges
Total Owing
$12,367 (Owed to Landlord)
Source
Similar Cases
Click to switch between case outcomes
Sripathy v Chilvers
Waterdown landlords regain possession of rental unit for personal use, tenant must vacate by January 31, 2025.
Singh v Gray
LTB upholds consent order terminating tenancy for non-payment of rent in Toronto.
Yassin v Smith
Pickering tenant faces potential eviction after dispute over rent increase and arrears
Hazelview Property Services Inc. v Fatemi
Toronto tenant evicted for non-payment of rent, owes $8,938.24 to landlord.
Sripathy v Chilvers
Waterdown landlords regain possession of rental unit for personal use, tenant must vacate by January 31, 2025.
Singh v Gray
LTB upholds consent order terminating tenancy for non-payment of rent in Toronto.
Yassin v Smith
Pickering tenant faces potential eviction after dispute over rent increase and arrears
Hazelview Property Services Inc. v Fatemi
Toronto tenant evicted for non-payment of rent, owes $8,938.24 to landlord.
Sripathy v Chilvers
Waterdown landlords regain possession of rental unit for personal use, tenant must vacate by January 31, 2025.
Singh v Gray
LTB upholds consent order terminating tenancy for non-payment of rent in Toronto.
Yassin v Smith
Pickering tenant faces potential eviction after dispute over rent increase and arrears
Hazelview Property Services Inc. v Fatemi
Toronto tenant evicted for non-payment of rent, owes $8,938.24 to landlord.
Sripathy v Chilvers
Waterdown landlords regain possession of rental unit for personal use, tenant must vacate by January 31, 2025.
Singh v Gray
LTB upholds consent order terminating tenancy for non-payment of rent in Toronto.
Yassin v Smith
Pickering tenant faces potential eviction after dispute over rent increase and arrears
Hazelview Property Services Inc. v Fatemi
Toronto tenant evicted for non-payment of rent, owes $8,938.24 to landlord.
Goklani v Cannata
Toronto tenants' maintenance dispute against landlord dismissed by LTB
Jeff v Ferguson
Woodstock landlords awarded $35,186 in rent arrears, tenants face eviction for non-payment.
Oxford Properties Group v Benjamin
Tenant ordered to pay $22,461.70 for flood damage with conditional tenancy preservation
Sufi Properties Ltd v Nieman
Tenants ordered to pay $16,866 in rent arrears to Former Landlord after complex dispute.