Landlord Wins Review Order: Maxwell v Bedard 2024
Landlord awarded $400 in costs after tenant abandons review request for eviction order in Sarnia non-payment case
Summarized by RentZenLast updated: September 23, 2024
Case Summary
4,148 Front St N, Sarnia, ON N7T5S3
Decision in favor of
landlord
Previous Order
Upheld
Dispute Categories
Notices Sent
Agree with the ruling?
Timeline
Application Date
May 2024
Tenancy End Date
Jun 2024
Hearing Date
Sep 2024
Order Date
Sep 16, 2024
Dispute Summary
Landlord applied for an order to terminate the tenancy and evict Tenant due to non-payment of rent. The order was issued in favor of the Landlord on May 27, 2024. The Tenant requested a review of the order, which was heard on September 3, 2024. The Tenant did not attend the review hearing.
Determinations
- Eviction occurred on June 26, 2024
- Tenant retrieved belongings on June 27, 2024
- Interim order returned as undelivered on July 19, 2024
- Tenant was properly served notice of review hearing
- Tenant did not attend review hearing
- Review request is considered abandoned
Case Study
Since the Tenant did not attend the review hearing, the review request is considered abandoned. The Landlord's Legal Representative requested costs against the Tenant for bringing a frivolous action and wasting the Board's and Landlord's time. The Board found the Tenant's actions caused the Landlord to incur additional legal costs and awarded the Landlord $400.00 in costs.
Decision Summary
The request to review the order issued on May 27, 2024 is dismissed. The order is confirmed and remains unchanged. The interim order issued on June 28, 2024 is cancelled and the stay is lifted. The Tenant shall pay the Landlord $400.00 as costs on or before September 30, 2024.
Adjudicator Details
LTB Member
Total Orders
484
Landlord Favorable
97.1%
Tenant Favorable
0.8%
Mutual Agreement
2.1%
Need assistance from an expert?
Sponsored
Source
Similar Cases
Click to switch between case outcomes
Sripathy v Chilvers
Waterdown landlords regain possession of rental unit for personal use, tenant must vacate by January 31, 2025.
Singh v Gray
LTB upholds consent order terminating tenancy for non-payment of rent in Toronto.
Yassin v Smith
Pickering tenant faces potential eviction after dispute over rent increase and arrears
Hazelview Property Services Inc. v Fatemi
Toronto tenant evicted for non-payment of rent, owes $8,938.24 to landlord.
Sripathy v Chilvers
Waterdown landlords regain possession of rental unit for personal use, tenant must vacate by January 31, 2025.
Singh v Gray
LTB upholds consent order terminating tenancy for non-payment of rent in Toronto.
Yassin v Smith
Pickering tenant faces potential eviction after dispute over rent increase and arrears
Hazelview Property Services Inc. v Fatemi
Toronto tenant evicted for non-payment of rent, owes $8,938.24 to landlord.
Sripathy v Chilvers
Waterdown landlords regain possession of rental unit for personal use, tenant must vacate by January 31, 2025.
Singh v Gray
LTB upholds consent order terminating tenancy for non-payment of rent in Toronto.
Yassin v Smith
Pickering tenant faces potential eviction after dispute over rent increase and arrears
Hazelview Property Services Inc. v Fatemi
Toronto tenant evicted for non-payment of rent, owes $8,938.24 to landlord.
Sripathy v Chilvers
Waterdown landlords regain possession of rental unit for personal use, tenant must vacate by January 31, 2025.
Singh v Gray
LTB upholds consent order terminating tenancy for non-payment of rent in Toronto.
Yassin v Smith
Pickering tenant faces potential eviction after dispute over rent increase and arrears
Hazelview Property Services Inc. v Fatemi
Toronto tenant evicted for non-payment of rent, owes $8,938.24 to landlord.
Goklani v Cannata
Toronto tenants' maintenance dispute against landlord dismissed by LTB
Jeff v Ferguson
Woodstock landlords awarded $35,186 in rent arrears, tenants face eviction for non-payment.
Oxford Properties Group v Benjamin
Tenant ordered to pay $22,461.70 for flood damage with conditional tenancy preservation
Sufi Properties Ltd v Nieman
Tenants ordered to pay $16,866 in rent arrears to Former Landlord after complex dispute.