RentZen LogoRentZen
Thanksgiving Sale30% offLimited time offer

Maddox Sherbourne Inc. and ONTARI Holdings Ltd. v Peart

Last updated: August 9, 2026

Share:

Order

Order Date: April 2, 2026
Unit ***, 191 SHERBOURNE ST, TORONTO, ON M5A3X1
Contested Dispute
Application L2Filed by LandlordDocument Order

Decision in favor of

Landlord

Notices Sent

Substantial Interference (N5)

Subsections of RTA Quoted

64(3)83(1)(a)83(2)204(1)
ContentionLow

Agree with the ruling?

PDF provided by the Ontario LTB Order Catalogue

Citation: Maddox Sherbourne Inc. and ONTARI Holdings Ltd. v Peart, LTB-L-081570-25, 2026 ONLTB 24754

File Number: LTB-L-081570-25

Timeline

Hearing Date

Mar 2026

24 days

Order Date

Apr 2, 2026

Decision

The Landlord's application for termination was granted; however, the order is conditional upon the Tenant vacating the temporary unit by April 17, 2026.

Unlock Order Content

Reason for Eviction Relief

The Tenant has lived in the unit since 2004 and the Adjudicator found that granting relief with conditions was appropriate under section 83.

Unlock Order Content

Dispute

The Landlord sought to terminate the tenancy because the Tenant failed to return to her original unit after a temporary relocation, resulting in the Tenant occupying two units simultaneously.

Unlock Order Content

Determinations

  • The Landlord established the grounds for termination as the Tenant failed to return to her rental unit.
  • The Tenant failed to void the N5 notice.
  • The Tenant is substantially interfering with the Landlord's reasonable enjoyment by refusing to vacate the temporary unit.
  • Unlock Order Content

Landlord's Arguments

Arguments

Landlord argued the unit was habitable and the Tenant's refusal to return caused ongoing financial loss.

Unlock Order Content

Actions and Evidence

Landlord testified that multiple environmental reports confirmed the unit was safe and free of toxic mould.

Unlock Order Content

Considerations

Unlock Order Content

Tenant's Arguments

Arguments

Tenant argued that mould was not properly remediated and the rental unit was uninhabitable.

Unlock Order Content

Actions and Evidence

Tenant refused to move back into the rental unit alleging health concerns and mould issues.

Unlock Order Content

Considerations

Unlock Order Content
Professional business person

Reach Landlords & Tenants

Advertise your legal or rental services to our audience

Sponsored

Similar Cases

Click to switch between order outcomes

Teoh v Vanduzen

Contested Dispute
Landlord Wins

The Landlord's application to terminate the tenancy for substantial interference was granted, with eviction postponed to September 30, 2026.

Landlord Aggravating Factor
Tenant Aggravating Factor
Testimony Contested
Eviction Relief Granted
ContentionHigh

Krafa Consultants & Management Inc. v Wright

Contested Dispute
Landlord Wins

The LTB issued a conditional order allowing the tenancy to continue and requiring the tenant to pay $1,356.00 in damages and costs over 36 monthly installments.

Landlord Aggravating Factor
Tenant Aggravating Factor
Testimony Contested
Eviction Relief Granted
ContentionLow

Campeau v L***** (Levesque)

Contested Dispute
Landlord Wins

The LTB terminated a tenancy for landlord's own use under an N12 notice, granting the tenant a delayed eviction date under section 83.

Landlord Aggravating Factor
Tenant Aggravating Factor
Testimony Contested
Eviction Relief Granted
ContentionLow

Abe v Bickerton

Contested Dispute
Landlord Wins

The Board terminated the tenancy and ordered eviction after the Tenants failed to pay significant rent and utility arrears and abandoned the hearing.

Landlord Aggravating Factor
Tenant Aggravating Factor
Testimony Contested
Section 82 Issues Raised and Denied
ContentionModerate

Teoh v Vanduzen

Contested Dispute
Landlord Wins

The Landlord's application to terminate the tenancy for substantial interference was granted, with eviction postponed to September 30, 2026.

Landlord Aggravating Factor
Tenant Aggravating Factor
Testimony Contested
Eviction Relief Granted
ContentionHigh

Krafa Consultants & Management Inc. v Wright

Contested Dispute
Landlord Wins

The LTB issued a conditional order allowing the tenancy to continue and requiring the tenant to pay $1,356.00 in damages and costs over 36 monthly installments.

Landlord Aggravating Factor
Tenant Aggravating Factor
Testimony Contested
Eviction Relief Granted
ContentionLow

Campeau v L***** (Levesque)

Contested Dispute
Landlord Wins

The LTB terminated a tenancy for landlord's own use under an N12 notice, granting the tenant a delayed eviction date under section 83.

Landlord Aggravating Factor
Tenant Aggravating Factor
Testimony Contested
Eviction Relief Granted
ContentionLow

Abe v Bickerton

Contested Dispute
Landlord Wins

The Board terminated the tenancy and ordered eviction after the Tenants failed to pay significant rent and utility arrears and abandoned the hearing.

Landlord Aggravating Factor
Tenant Aggravating Factor
Testimony Contested
Section 82 Issues Raised and Denied
ContentionModerate

Unlock More Similar Orders

Access our complete database of similar cases to make more informed decisions and better understand LTB rulings.

Compare outcomes of similar cases to assess your position

Analyze patterns in LTB decisions for your case type

Build stronger arguments with real case references

Share:

Latest Insights from Our Blog

Stay informed with expert analysis on rental law, tenant rights, and LTB decisions

Need Legal Help? We've Got You Covered

Whether you need to find qualified legal professionals or post your specific legal needs to get competitive quotes, our platform connects you with the right help.

Find Legal Professionals

Browse our directory of verified paralegals and lawyers specializing in Ontario rental law and LTB matters.

Browse Professionals

Post Your Legal Needs

Describe your legal situation and receive competitive quotes from qualified professionals in our marketplace.

Post a Bounty

Join thousands of Ontarians who have found legal help through our platform