Luu v Zeigler

Last updated: January 12, 2025

Order

Ordered by Kate Sinipostolova,Tribunals Ontario  under Section 69, Residential Tenancies Act, 2006

Order Date: August 12, 2024
*** Queens Quay W, Toronto, ON M5J2Y6
Contested Dispute

Decision in favor of

Landlord

Ordered Amount

$12,939

to Landlord

Notices Sent

Persistent late payment (N5)

Subsections of RTA Quoted

64(3)83(1)
ContentionHigh

Agree with the ruling?

Citation: Luu v Zeigler, 2024 ONLTB 54921

File Number: LTB-L-061432-23

Timeline

Application Date

Jun 2023

11 months

Hearing Date

Apr 2024

4 months

Order Date

Aug 12, 2024

19 days

Tenancy End Date

Aug 2024

Decision

The Landlord's application is granted. The tenancy is terminated effective August 31, 2024. The Tenant must pay the Landlord $12,939.34, which includes the cost of repairs and the application fee, minus the rent deposit and interest. If the Tenant does not pay by August 31, 2024, they will owe interest starting September 1, 2024.

Unlock Order Content

Reason for Eviction Relief

Tenant paid rent up to hearing date and did not interfere or damage unit after N5 notice

Unlock Order Content

Dispute

Landlord applied for an order to terminate the tenancy and evict Tenants due to substantial interference and damage to the rental unit. The Landlord claimed the Tenants caused a flood by misusing the washing machine.

Unlock Order Content

Determinations

  • Landlord served valid N5 Notice
  • Tenants did not void notice by repairing damage
  • Tenants in possession on application date
  • Washing machine leak caused by Tenant overloading
  • Landlord incurred $15,457.12 in repair costs
  • Unlock Order Content

Landlord's Arguments

Actions and Evidence

Landlord presented evidence that washing machine was overloaded, causing flood and $15,457.12 in damages

Unlock Order Content

Tenant's Arguments

Arguments

Tenant argued N5 notice was defective because it did not name all tenants

Unlock Order Content

Actions and Evidence

Tenant disputed that washing machine was overloaded, claimed fault was with machine

Unlock Order Content

Need assistance from an expert?

Financial Details

Lawful Rent

$2,595

Application Fee

$186

Rent Deposit

$2,595

Deposit Interest

$109

Damages

$15,457

Ordered Amount

$12,939 (to Landlord)

Similar Cases

Click to switch between order outcomes

ZAHRA PROPERTIES v UFOEGBUNE

Contested Dispute
Landlord Wins
July 24, 2025
Toronto
Review Order

Toronto tenant's eviction for over $23,000 in rent arrears upheld after their counterclaims of harassment and assault were dismissed on procedural grounds.

Tenant Sent Invalid Notice
Testimony Contested
Section 82 Issues Raised and Denied
ContentionExtreme

PAK PETROLEUM INC v DEGUIRE

Contested Dispute
Landlord Wins
July 21, 2025
VANKLEEK HILL

Tenant facing eviction for over $4,700 in unpaid rent despite claims of no hot water and being bitten twice by rats.

Testimony Contested
Eviction Relief Granted
Section 82 Issues Raised and Denied
ContentionExtreme

Thomas v Thomas

Contested Dispute
Landlord Wins
July 21, 2025
Ottawa

LTB rules the Residential Tenancies Act does not apply to siblings sharing a home, as the shared kitchen exemption holds despite a standard lease and the landlord's temporary absences.

Testimony Contested
RTA Not Applicable
ContentionModerate

Pennytech Inc v Superior Building Group Limited

Contested Dispute
Landlord Wins
July 21, 2025
Port Carling
Review Order

LTB upholds ruling against a corporate tenant and admonishes their lawyer for submitting fake, AI-generated legal citations.

Tenant Aggravating Factor
Testimony Contested
RTA Not Applicable
ContentionExtreme

ZAHRA PROPERTIES v UFOEGBUNE

Contested Dispute
Landlord Wins
July 24, 2025
Toronto
Review Order

Toronto tenant's eviction for over $23,000 in rent arrears upheld after their counterclaims of harassment and assault were dismissed on procedural grounds.

Tenant Sent Invalid Notice
Testimony Contested
Section 82 Issues Raised and Denied
ContentionExtreme

PAK PETROLEUM INC v DEGUIRE

Contested Dispute
Landlord Wins
July 21, 2025
VANKLEEK HILL

Tenant facing eviction for over $4,700 in unpaid rent despite claims of no hot water and being bitten twice by rats.

Testimony Contested
Eviction Relief Granted
Section 82 Issues Raised and Denied
ContentionExtreme

Thomas v Thomas

Contested Dispute
Landlord Wins
July 21, 2025
Ottawa

LTB rules the Residential Tenancies Act does not apply to siblings sharing a home, as the shared kitchen exemption holds despite a standard lease and the landlord's temporary absences.

Testimony Contested
RTA Not Applicable
ContentionModerate

Pennytech Inc v Superior Building Group Limited

Contested Dispute
Landlord Wins
July 21, 2025
Port Carling
Review Order

LTB upholds ruling against a corporate tenant and admonishes their lawyer for submitting fake, AI-generated legal citations.

Tenant Aggravating Factor
Testimony Contested
RTA Not Applicable
ContentionExtreme

Unlock More Similar Orders

Access our complete database of similar cases to make more informed decisions and better understand LTB rulings.

Compare outcomes of similar cases to assess your position

Analyze patterns in LTB decisions for your case type

Build stronger arguments with real case references

Share:

Latest Insights from Our Blog

Stay informed with expert analysis on rental law, tenant rights, and LTB decisions

Need Legal Help? We've Got You Covered

Whether you need to find qualified legal professionals or post your specific legal needs to get competitive quotes, our platform connects you with the right help.

Find Legal Professionals

Browse our directory of verified paralegals and lawyers specializing in Ontario rental law and LTB matters.

Browse Professionals

Post Your Legal Needs

Describe your legal situation and receive competitive quotes from qualified professionals in our marketplace.

Post a Bounty

Join thousands of Ontarians who have found legal help through our platform