LES IMMEUBLES MAJE v Barton - LTB Review Order 2023
LTB denies landlord's request to review order on terminating tenancy for alleged serious problems
Summarized by RentZenLast updated: September 12, 2024
Case Summary
2 593 Main, Hawkesbury, ON K6A1B3
Decision in favor of
landlord
Previous Order
Upheld
Dispute Categories
Notices Sent
Agree with the ruling?
Timeline
Order Date
Jul 5, 2023
Dispute Summary
The landlord applied for an order to terminate the tenancy and evict the tenant due to alleged serious problems caused by the tenant. The landlord requested a review of the previous order, arguing that the Board made serious errors in its findings.
Determinations
- Hearing Order contained some factual errors, but they were not determinative of the findings
- Hearing Member's reliance on relevant evidence was appropriate
- Landlord's request to review the order is denied
Case Study
The Hearing Member's findings of fact are entitled to considerable deference. The landlord must persuade the Board that there appears to be no rational connection between the Hearing Member's findings of fact and the evidence in the original hearing. The Board did not make a serious error that would have resulted in a different outcome.
Decision Summary
The landlord's request to review the previous order is denied. The Board did not make a serious error that would have resulted in a different outcome.
Adjudicator Details
LTB Member
Total Orders
159
Landlord Favorable
86.8%
Tenant Favorable
8.2%
Mutual Agreement
5.0%
Need assistance from an expert?
Sponsored
Source
Similar Cases
Click to switch between case outcomes
Sripathy v Chilvers
Waterdown landlords regain possession of rental unit for personal use, tenant must vacate by January 31, 2025.
Singh v Gray
LTB upholds consent order terminating tenancy for non-payment of rent in Toronto.
Yassin v Smith
Pickering tenant faces potential eviction after dispute over rent increase and arrears
Hazelview Property Services Inc. v Fatemi
Toronto tenant evicted for non-payment of rent, owes $8,938.24 to landlord.
Sripathy v Chilvers
Waterdown landlords regain possession of rental unit for personal use, tenant must vacate by January 31, 2025.
Singh v Gray
LTB upholds consent order terminating tenancy for non-payment of rent in Toronto.
Yassin v Smith
Pickering tenant faces potential eviction after dispute over rent increase and arrears
Hazelview Property Services Inc. v Fatemi
Toronto tenant evicted for non-payment of rent, owes $8,938.24 to landlord.
Sripathy v Chilvers
Waterdown landlords regain possession of rental unit for personal use, tenant must vacate by January 31, 2025.
Singh v Gray
LTB upholds consent order terminating tenancy for non-payment of rent in Toronto.
Yassin v Smith
Pickering tenant faces potential eviction after dispute over rent increase and arrears
Hazelview Property Services Inc. v Fatemi
Toronto tenant evicted for non-payment of rent, owes $8,938.24 to landlord.
Sripathy v Chilvers
Waterdown landlords regain possession of rental unit for personal use, tenant must vacate by January 31, 2025.
Singh v Gray
LTB upholds consent order terminating tenancy for non-payment of rent in Toronto.
Yassin v Smith
Pickering tenant faces potential eviction after dispute over rent increase and arrears
Hazelview Property Services Inc. v Fatemi
Toronto tenant evicted for non-payment of rent, owes $8,938.24 to landlord.
Goklani v Cannata
Toronto tenants' maintenance dispute against landlord dismissed by LTB
Jeff v Ferguson
Woodstock landlords awarded $35,186 in rent arrears, tenants face eviction for non-payment.
Oxford Properties Group v Benjamin
Tenant ordered to pay $22,461.70 for flood damage with conditional tenancy preservation
Sufi Properties Ltd v Nieman
Tenants ordered to pay $16,866 in rent arrears to Former Landlord after complex dispute.