Kingston & Frontenac Housing Corporation v Sarena Graham - LTB Review Order
Kingston landlord granted access to rental unit after tenant withdraws review request
Summarized by RentZenLast updated: September 12, 2024
Case Summary
311 Bagot St, Kingston, ON K7K6B7
Dispute resolved in
agreement
Previous Order
Upheld
Dispute Categories
Notices Sent
Agree with the ruling?
Timeline
Application Date
Dec 2022
Hearing Date
Apr 2023
Order Date
May 1, 2023
Dispute Summary
The landlord applied for an order to terminate the tenancy and evict the tenant due to non-payment of rent. The application was resolved by an order issued on March 6, 2023. The tenant then requested a review of the order and a stay of the order until the review was resolved. An interim order was issued on April 11, 2023, staying the previous order.
Determinations
- Tenant withdrew request for review
- Landlord permitted to enter unit to dispose of unhygienic items and treat for pests
- Stay of previous order lifted on May 6, 2023
Case Study
The parties agreed that the tenant would withdraw their request for review and the landlord would be permitted to enter the rental unit immediately to dispose of unhygienic items and treat the unit for pests. The parties contested the date the stay should be lifted, and the adjudicator found it appropriate to provide a minor delay in lifting the stay to give the tenant the opportunity to remove their belongings.
Decision Summary
The request to review the order issued on March 6, 2023 is withdrawn. The order is confirmed and remains unchanged. The interim order issued on April 11, 2023 is cancelled. The stay of the order issued on March 6, 2023 is lifted on May 6, 2023, and the landlord may enter the rental unit to remove unhygienic items and treat the unit for pests.
Adjudicator Details
LTB Member
Total Orders
929
Landlord Favorable
92.5%
Tenant Favorable
4.1%
Mutual Agreement
3.4%
Need assistance from an expert?
Sponsored
Source
Similar Cases
Click to switch between case outcomes
Sripathy v Chilvers
Waterdown landlords regain possession of rental unit for personal use, tenant must vacate by January 31, 2025.
Singh v Gray
LTB upholds consent order terminating tenancy for non-payment of rent in Toronto.
Yassin v Smith
Pickering tenant faces potential eviction after dispute over rent increase and arrears
Hazelview Property Services Inc. v Fatemi
Toronto tenant evicted for non-payment of rent, owes $8,938.24 to landlord.
Sripathy v Chilvers
Waterdown landlords regain possession of rental unit for personal use, tenant must vacate by January 31, 2025.
Singh v Gray
LTB upholds consent order terminating tenancy for non-payment of rent in Toronto.
Yassin v Smith
Pickering tenant faces potential eviction after dispute over rent increase and arrears
Hazelview Property Services Inc. v Fatemi
Toronto tenant evicted for non-payment of rent, owes $8,938.24 to landlord.
Sripathy v Chilvers
Waterdown landlords regain possession of rental unit for personal use, tenant must vacate by January 31, 2025.
Singh v Gray
LTB upholds consent order terminating tenancy for non-payment of rent in Toronto.
Yassin v Smith
Pickering tenant faces potential eviction after dispute over rent increase and arrears
Hazelview Property Services Inc. v Fatemi
Toronto tenant evicted for non-payment of rent, owes $8,938.24 to landlord.
Sripathy v Chilvers
Waterdown landlords regain possession of rental unit for personal use, tenant must vacate by January 31, 2025.
Singh v Gray
LTB upholds consent order terminating tenancy for non-payment of rent in Toronto.
Yassin v Smith
Pickering tenant faces potential eviction after dispute over rent increase and arrears
Hazelview Property Services Inc. v Fatemi
Toronto tenant evicted for non-payment of rent, owes $8,938.24 to landlord.
Goklani v Cannata
Toronto tenants' maintenance dispute against landlord dismissed by LTB
Jeff v Ferguson
Woodstock landlords awarded $35,186 in rent arrears, tenants face eviction for non-payment.
Oxford Properties Group v Benjamin
Tenant ordered to pay $22,461.70 for flood damage with conditional tenancy preservation
Sufi Properties Ltd v Nieman
Tenants ordered to pay $16,866 in rent arrears to Former Landlord after complex dispute.