Landlord Wins Personal Use Case: Grillo v Sinopoli 2024
North York landlords win personal use eviction case, tenant must vacate by April 30, 2024 and pay $9370
Summarized by RentZenLast updated: October 13, 2024
Case Summary
3 1463 Wilson Ave, North York, ON M3M1J5
Decision in favor of
landlord
Balance Owed to Landlord
$9,370
Dispute Categories
Notices Sent
Agree with the ruling?
Timeline
Application Date
Jan 2023
Hearing Date
Jan 2024
Order Date
Feb 21, 2024
Tenancy End Date
Apr 2024
Dispute Summary
Landlords applied for an order to terminate the tenancy and evict Tenant because the Landlord's Child, in good faith, requires possession of the rental unit for the purpose of residential occupation for at least one year.
Determinations
- Landlords served valid N12 notice
- Landlord's son requires unit for residential occupation for at least 1 year
- Landlords acted in good faith
- Tenant was in possession on application date
- Tenant has resided in unit since 2016
- Tenant helped renovate unit
Arguments and Actions
Tenant
Arguments
Tenant argued that the Landlords are acting in bad faith and are trying to evict him because he pays only $1,000.00/month in rent.
Actions
Tenant has helped renovate the rental unit through repainting and making repairs on his own.
Decision Summary
The tenancy between the Landlords and the Tenant shall terminate by April 30, 2024. The Tenant must move out of the rental unit on or before April 30, 2024. If the unit is not vacated on or before April 30, 2024, then starting May 1, 2024, the Landlords may file this order with the Court Enforcement Office (Sheriff) so that the eviction may be enforced. The Tenant shall pay to the Landlords $9,369.86, less any rent already paid to the Landlords since April 1, 2023. The Tenant shall also pay the Landlords compensation of $32.88 per day for the use of the unit starting January 11, 2024, until the date the Tenant moves out of the unit.
Reason for Eviction Relief
Tenant has limited income, physical challenges, and long tenancy
Adjudicator Details
LTB Member
Total Orders
269
Landlord Favorable
86.6%
Tenant Favorable
8.9%
Mutual Agreement
4.5%
Need assistance from an expert?
Sponsored
Financial Details
Lawful Rent
$1,000
Total Owing
$9,370 (Owed to Landlord)
Source
Similar Cases
Click to switch between case outcomes
Sripathy v Chilvers
Waterdown landlords regain possession of rental unit for personal use, tenant must vacate by January 31, 2025.
Singh v Gray
LTB upholds consent order terminating tenancy for non-payment of rent in Toronto.
Yassin v Smith
Pickering tenant faces potential eviction after dispute over rent increase and arrears
Hazelview Property Services Inc. v Fatemi
Toronto tenant evicted for non-payment of rent, owes $8,938.24 to landlord.
Sripathy v Chilvers
Waterdown landlords regain possession of rental unit for personal use, tenant must vacate by January 31, 2025.
Singh v Gray
LTB upholds consent order terminating tenancy for non-payment of rent in Toronto.
Yassin v Smith
Pickering tenant faces potential eviction after dispute over rent increase and arrears
Hazelview Property Services Inc. v Fatemi
Toronto tenant evicted for non-payment of rent, owes $8,938.24 to landlord.
Sripathy v Chilvers
Waterdown landlords regain possession of rental unit for personal use, tenant must vacate by January 31, 2025.
Singh v Gray
LTB upholds consent order terminating tenancy for non-payment of rent in Toronto.
Yassin v Smith
Pickering tenant faces potential eviction after dispute over rent increase and arrears
Hazelview Property Services Inc. v Fatemi
Toronto tenant evicted for non-payment of rent, owes $8,938.24 to landlord.
Sripathy v Chilvers
Waterdown landlords regain possession of rental unit for personal use, tenant must vacate by January 31, 2025.
Singh v Gray
LTB upholds consent order terminating tenancy for non-payment of rent in Toronto.
Yassin v Smith
Pickering tenant faces potential eviction after dispute over rent increase and arrears
Hazelview Property Services Inc. v Fatemi
Toronto tenant evicted for non-payment of rent, owes $8,938.24 to landlord.
Goklani v Cannata
Toronto tenants' maintenance dispute against landlord dismissed by LTB
Jeff v Ferguson
Woodstock landlords awarded $35,186 in rent arrears, tenants face eviction for non-payment.
Oxford Properties Group v Benjamin
Tenant ordered to pay $22,461.70 for flood damage with conditional tenancy preservation
Sufi Properties Ltd v Nieman
Tenants ordered to pay $16,866 in rent arrears to Former Landlord after complex dispute.