Landlord Wins Eviction Case: Grey County Housing v Graham 2024
Hanover landlord wins eviction case, tenant ordered to pay $15482 for non-payment, interference, and safety issues
Summarized by RentZenLast updated: November 3, 2024
Case Summary
505 14th St, Hanover, ON N4N1Z8
Decision in favor of
landlord
Balance Owed to Landlord
$15,482
Dispute Categories
Notices Sent
Subsections of RTA Quoted
Agree with the ruling?
Timeline
Application Date
Dec 2023
Hearing Date
Jun 2024
Order Date
Jul 10, 2024
Tenancy End Date
Jul 2024
Dispute Summary
Landlord applied for an order to terminate the tenancy and evict Tenant due to non-payment of rent, substantial interference, serious impairment of safety, and willful damage. The Tenant did not attend the hearing.
Determinations
- Landlord served valid N4 Notice
- Tenant did not void N4 notice by paying arrears
- Tenant still in possession on application date
- Lawful rent is $790 per month
- Tenant has not made any payments since application
- Rent arrears of $15,800 as of hearing date
- Landlord incurred $186 in application filing fees
- No last month's rent deposit
- Tenant did not attend hearing, no evidence of circumstances to grant relief from eviction
- Landlord proved Tenant seriously impaired safety by disconnecting dryer vent
- Landlord failed to prove Tenant willfully caused sewer backup
Decision Summary
The tenancy is terminated effective July 21, 2024. The Tenant must pay the Landlord $15,481.67, which includes rent arrears and application filing fees. If the Tenant does not pay by July 21, 2024, the Landlord can file the order with the Sheriff for enforcement. The Landlord proved the Tenant seriously impaired safety by disconnecting the dryer vent, but failed to prove the Tenant willfully caused a sewer backup.
Adjudicator Details
LTB Member
Total Orders
47
Landlord Favorable
91.5%
Tenant Favorable
8.5%
Mutual Agreement
0.0%
Need assistance from an expert?
Sponsored
Financial Details
Lawful Rent
$790
Rent Arrears
$15,800
Application Fee
$186
Total Owing
$15,482 (Owed to Landlord)
Source
Similar Cases
Click to switch between case outcomes
Sripathy v Chilvers
Waterdown landlords regain possession of rental unit for personal use, tenant must vacate by January 31, 2025.
Singh v Gray
LTB upholds consent order terminating tenancy for non-payment of rent in Toronto.
Yassin v Smith
Pickering tenant faces potential eviction after dispute over rent increase and arrears
Hazelview Property Services Inc. v Fatemi
Toronto tenant evicted for non-payment of rent, owes $8,938.24 to landlord.
Sripathy v Chilvers
Waterdown landlords regain possession of rental unit for personal use, tenant must vacate by January 31, 2025.
Singh v Gray
LTB upholds consent order terminating tenancy for non-payment of rent in Toronto.
Yassin v Smith
Pickering tenant faces potential eviction after dispute over rent increase and arrears
Hazelview Property Services Inc. v Fatemi
Toronto tenant evicted for non-payment of rent, owes $8,938.24 to landlord.
Sripathy v Chilvers
Waterdown landlords regain possession of rental unit for personal use, tenant must vacate by January 31, 2025.
Singh v Gray
LTB upholds consent order terminating tenancy for non-payment of rent in Toronto.
Yassin v Smith
Pickering tenant faces potential eviction after dispute over rent increase and arrears
Hazelview Property Services Inc. v Fatemi
Toronto tenant evicted for non-payment of rent, owes $8,938.24 to landlord.
Sripathy v Chilvers
Waterdown landlords regain possession of rental unit for personal use, tenant must vacate by January 31, 2025.
Singh v Gray
LTB upholds consent order terminating tenancy for non-payment of rent in Toronto.
Yassin v Smith
Pickering tenant faces potential eviction after dispute over rent increase and arrears
Hazelview Property Services Inc. v Fatemi
Toronto tenant evicted for non-payment of rent, owes $8,938.24 to landlord.
Goklani v Cannata
Toronto tenants' maintenance dispute against landlord dismissed by LTB
Jeff v Ferguson
Woodstock landlords awarded $35,186 in rent arrears, tenants face eviction for non-payment.
Oxford Properties Group v Benjamin
Tenant ordered to pay $22,461.70 for flood damage with conditional tenancy preservation
Sufi Properties Ltd v Nieman
Tenants ordered to pay $16,866 in rent arrears to Former Landlord after complex dispute.