GP v CW and MC

Last updated: July 30, 2024

Order

Ordered by ,Tribunals Ontario  under Section 69, Residential Tenancies Act 2006

Order Date: August 8, 2016
Contested Dispute

Decision in favor of

Landlord

Ordered Amount

$2,907

to Landlord

Notices Sent

Non-payment of rent (N4)
ContentionHigh

Agree with the ruling?

Citation: GP v CW and MC, 2016 CanLII 72093

File Number: EAL-58272-16

Timeline

Hearing Date

Aug 2016

4 days

Order Date

Aug 8, 2016

11 days

Tenancy End Date

Aug 2016

Decision

The L3 application is dismissed. On the L1 application, the tenancy is terminated effective August 19, 2016 unless the Tenants pay $2,645 by that date to void the eviction order. The Tenants must also pay $2,907.30 to the Landlord, plus $27.12 per day starting August 9, 2016 until they vacate.

Unlock Order Content

Dispute

Landlord applied for an order to terminate the tenancy and evict Tenants due to failure to pay rent. Landlord also applied to terminate the tenancy because Tenants gave a notice to terminate the tenancy.

Unlock Order Content

Determinations

  • Tenants did not pay rent for April 1, 2016 to August 31, 2016
  • Landlord served valid N4 Notice
  • Landlord collected $600 rent deposit
  • Interest on rent deposit owed to Tenants
  • No relief from eviction granted
  • Tenants' notice to terminate tenancy was drafted by Landlord's paralegal, not Tenants
  • Tenants did not wish to terminate tenancy
  • Unlock Order Content

Landlord's Arguments

Procedural Errors

Landlord's paralegal GF's affidavit to the Board was deliberately misleading.

Unlock Order Content

Tenant's Arguments

Actions and Evidence

Tenants stated they thought they were signing an acknowledgment of being served a notice to vacate, not a notice to terminate the tenancy.

Unlock Order Content

Need assistance from an expert?

Financial Details

Rent Arrears

$624

Application Fee

$170

Rent Deposit

$600

Deposit Interest

$18

Ordered Amount

$2,907 (to Landlord)

Similar Cases

Click to switch between order outcomes

ZAHRA PROPERTIES v UFOEGBUNE

Contested Dispute
Landlord Wins
July 24, 2025
Toronto
Review Order

Toronto tenant's eviction for over $23,000 in rent arrears upheld after their counterclaims of harassment and assault were dismissed on procedural grounds.

Tenant Sent Invalid Notice
Testimony Contested
Section 82 Issues Raised and Denied
ContentionExtreme

PAK PETROLEUM INC v DEGUIRE

Contested Dispute
Landlord Wins
July 21, 2025
VANKLEEK HILL

Tenant facing eviction for over $4,700 in unpaid rent despite claims of no hot water and being bitten twice by rats.

Testimony Contested
Eviction Relief Granted
Section 82 Issues Raised and Denied
ContentionExtreme

Thomas v Thomas

Contested Dispute
Landlord Wins
July 21, 2025
Ottawa

LTB rules the Residential Tenancies Act does not apply to siblings sharing a home, as the shared kitchen exemption holds despite a standard lease and the landlord's temporary absences.

Testimony Contested
RTA Not Applicable
ContentionModerate

Pennytech Inc v Superior Building Group Limited

Contested Dispute
Landlord Wins
July 21, 2025
Port Carling
Review Order

LTB upholds ruling against a corporate tenant and admonishes their lawyer for submitting fake, AI-generated legal citations.

Tenant Aggravating Factor
Testimony Contested
RTA Not Applicable
ContentionExtreme

ZAHRA PROPERTIES v UFOEGBUNE

Contested Dispute
Landlord Wins
July 24, 2025
Toronto
Review Order

Toronto tenant's eviction for over $23,000 in rent arrears upheld after their counterclaims of harassment and assault were dismissed on procedural grounds.

Tenant Sent Invalid Notice
Testimony Contested
Section 82 Issues Raised and Denied
ContentionExtreme

PAK PETROLEUM INC v DEGUIRE

Contested Dispute
Landlord Wins
July 21, 2025
VANKLEEK HILL

Tenant facing eviction for over $4,700 in unpaid rent despite claims of no hot water and being bitten twice by rats.

Testimony Contested
Eviction Relief Granted
Section 82 Issues Raised and Denied
ContentionExtreme

Thomas v Thomas

Contested Dispute
Landlord Wins
July 21, 2025
Ottawa

LTB rules the Residential Tenancies Act does not apply to siblings sharing a home, as the shared kitchen exemption holds despite a standard lease and the landlord's temporary absences.

Testimony Contested
RTA Not Applicable
ContentionModerate

Pennytech Inc v Superior Building Group Limited

Contested Dispute
Landlord Wins
July 21, 2025
Port Carling
Review Order

LTB upholds ruling against a corporate tenant and admonishes their lawyer for submitting fake, AI-generated legal citations.

Tenant Aggravating Factor
Testimony Contested
RTA Not Applicable
ContentionExtreme

Unlock More Similar Orders

Access our complete database of similar cases to make more informed decisions and better understand LTB rulings.

Compare outcomes of similar cases to assess your position

Analyze patterns in LTB decisions for your case type

Build stronger arguments with real case references

Share:

Latest Insights from Our Blog

Stay informed with expert analysis on rental law, tenant rights, and LTB decisions

Need Legal Help? We've Got You Covered

Whether you need to find qualified legal professionals or post your specific legal needs to get competitive quotes, our platform connects you with the right help.

Find Legal Professionals

Browse our directory of verified paralegals and lawyers specializing in Ontario rental law and LTB matters.

Browse Professionals

Post Your Legal Needs

Describe your legal situation and receive competitive quotes from qualified professionals in our marketplace.

Post a Bounty

Join thousands of Ontarians who have found legal help through our platform