Golden Leaf, Group of Companies Limited v Dinicolo, Pulec, Red Horse Properties Inc.
Last updated: August 9, 2026
Order
Decision in favor of
Tenant
Dispute Categories
Subsections of RTA Quoted
Agree with the ruling?
PDF provided by the Ontario LTB Order Catalogue
Citation: Golden Leaf, Group of Companies Limited v Dinicolo, Pulec, Red Horse Properties Inc., LTB-L-108456-25
File Number: LTB-L-108456-25
Timeline
Hearing Date
Apr 2026
Order Date
Apr 29, 2026
Decision
The application is dismissed because the Landlord failed to establish a landlord-tenant relationship and could not provide evidence of ownership of the property.
Dispute
Landlord applied to terminate the tenancy alleging the Tenant was an employee whose employment ended. The Tenant argued that the Landlord is not the owner of the property and that no landlord-tenant relationship exists.
Determinations
- The Landlord failed to prove it was the owner or landlord of the property.
- The land registry evidence confirmed that the property is owned by the entity named as a Tenant.
- The Board lacked jurisdiction because no landlord-tenant relationship exists.
Landlord's Arguments
Arguments
The Landlord argued that it was the owner of the property.
Actions and Evidence
The Landlord's agent argued that he controlled a corporation he claimed was the landlord and that the property address was the corporation's address for service.
Considerations
Tenant's Arguments
Arguments
The Tenant argued that the Board lacks jurisdiction because the Landlord is not the owner of the property and no landlord-tenant relationship exists.
Actions and Evidence
The Tenant provided land registry documentation proving that the named occupant, a corporation owned by the Tenants, is the registered owner of the property.
Considerations
Similar Cases
Click to switch between order outcomes
Toronto Community Housing Corporation v Palacios
The LTB found that an unauthorized occupant committed illegal acts and impaired safety at the residential complex, but granted the Tenant conditional relief from eviction.
Saickley Enterprises Ltd. v Holst
The LTB terminated the tenancy and ordered eviction based on an unfulfilled agreement to terminate, requiring the tenant to pay the filing fee.
Singh and Thind Holding Inc. v Boyd
The LTB denied a tenant's review request of a consent termination order, finding no serious error or valid grounds to overturn the agreement despite changed financial circumstances.
Maebrook Rideau Inc. v Hiyadi
The Landlord was granted an order terminating the tenancy and requiring the Tenant to pay rent arrears following the Tenant's departure from the unit.
Toronto Community Housing Corporation v Palacios
The LTB found that an unauthorized occupant committed illegal acts and impaired safety at the residential complex, but granted the Tenant conditional relief from eviction.
Saickley Enterprises Ltd. v Holst
The LTB terminated the tenancy and ordered eviction based on an unfulfilled agreement to terminate, requiring the tenant to pay the filing fee.
Singh and Thind Holding Inc. v Boyd
The LTB denied a tenant's review request of a consent termination order, finding no serious error or valid grounds to overturn the agreement despite changed financial circumstances.
Maebrook Rideau Inc. v Hiyadi
The Landlord was granted an order terminating the tenancy and requiring the Tenant to pay rent arrears following the Tenant's departure from the unit.
Toronto Community Housing Corporation v Palacios
The LTB found that an unauthorized occupant committed illegal acts and impaired safety at the residential complex, but granted the Tenant conditional relief from eviction.
Saickley Enterprises Ltd. v Holst
The LTB terminated the tenancy and ordered eviction based on an unfulfilled agreement to terminate, requiring the tenant to pay the filing fee.
Singh and Thind Holding Inc. v Boyd
The LTB denied a tenant's review request of a consent termination order, finding no serious error or valid grounds to overturn the agreement despite changed financial circumstances.
Maebrook Rideau Inc. v Hiyadi
The Landlord was granted an order terminating the tenancy and requiring the Tenant to pay rent arrears following the Tenant's departure from the unit.
Toronto Community Housing Corporation v Palacios
The LTB found that an unauthorized occupant committed illegal acts and impaired safety at the residential complex, but granted the Tenant conditional relief from eviction.
Saickley Enterprises Ltd. v Holst
The LTB terminated the tenancy and ordered eviction based on an unfulfilled agreement to terminate, requiring the tenant to pay the filing fee.
Singh and Thind Holding Inc. v Boyd
The LTB denied a tenant's review request of a consent termination order, finding no serious error or valid grounds to overturn the agreement despite changed financial circumstances.
Maebrook Rideau Inc. v Hiyadi
The Landlord was granted an order terminating the tenancy and requiring the Tenant to pay rent arrears following the Tenant's departure from the unit.
Maebrook Rideau Inc. v Hiyadi
The Landlord was granted an order terminating the tenancy and requiring the Tenant to pay rent arrears and application fees, offset by the rent deposit and interest.
R*** Hotel and Resorts Inc. v Lawrence
The LTB terminated the tenancy and ordered eviction without a hearing based on a signed agreement to terminate.
Singh and Thind Holding Inc. v Boyd
The LTB dismissed a tenant's review request seeking to set aside a consent termination order, upholding the agreement and noting the tenant's breach of hearing recording prohibitions.
Singh and Thind Holding Inc. v Boyd
The LTB dismissed a tenant's review request seeking to set aside a consent termination order, finding no procedural unfairness or grounds to overturn the valid agreement.
Latest Insights from Our Blog
Stay informed with expert analysis on rental law, tenant rights, and LTB decisions

The Appeal Process Decoded: When and How to Challenge LTB Decisions at the Divisional Court
Navigate the complex world of appealing Landlord and Tenant Board decisions to Ontario's Divisional Court. Learn the strict requirements, common pitfalls, and strategies for successful appeals.

The N8 Notice Deep Dive: Persistent Late Payment and How It Differs from Non-Payment Cases in Ontario
Understanding the critical differences between N4 and N8 notices, common pitfalls that invalidate N8 notices, and the unique legal standards for persistent late payment cases.

Top Tenant Mistakes in LTB Applications (And How to Avoid Them)
Learn from real LTB cases why tenant applications fail. Discover the most common mistakes that lead to dismissed applications and practical strategies to strengthen your case and protect your rights as a tenant.
Need Legal Help? We've Got You Covered
Whether you need to find qualified legal professionals or post your specific legal needs to get competitive quotes, our platform connects you with the right help.
Find Legal Professionals
Browse our directory of verified paralegals and lawyers specializing in Ontario rental law and LTB matters.
Browse ProfessionalsPost Your Legal Needs
Describe your legal situation and receive competitive quotes from qualified professionals in our marketplace.
Post a BountyJoin thousands of Ontarians who have found legal help through our platform
