RentZen LogoRentZen
Thanksgiving Sale30% offLimited time offer

Golden Leaf, Group of Companies Limited v Dinicolo, Pulec, Red Horse Properties Inc.

Last updated: August 9, 2026

Share:

Order

Order Date: April 29, 2026
*** ROCMARY PL, Vaughan, ON L3L0A9
Contested Dispute
Application L2Filed by LandlordDocument Order

Decision in favor of

Tenant

Dispute Categories

Subsections of RTA Quoted

ContentionLow

Agree with the ruling?

PDF provided by the Ontario LTB Order Catalogue

Citation: Golden Leaf, Group of Companies Limited v Dinicolo, Pulec, Red Horse Properties Inc., LTB-L-108456-25

File Number: LTB-L-108456-25

Timeline

Hearing Date

Apr 2026

8 days

Order Date

Apr 29, 2026

Decision

The application is dismissed because the Landlord failed to establish a landlord-tenant relationship and could not provide evidence of ownership of the property.

Unlock Order Content

Dispute

Landlord applied to terminate the tenancy alleging the Tenant was an employee whose employment ended. The Tenant argued that the Landlord is not the owner of the property and that no landlord-tenant relationship exists.

Unlock Order Content

Determinations

  • The Landlord failed to prove it was the owner or landlord of the property.
  • The land registry evidence confirmed that the property is owned by the entity named as a Tenant.
  • The Board lacked jurisdiction because no landlord-tenant relationship exists.
  • Unlock Order Content

Landlord's Arguments

Arguments

The Landlord argued that it was the owner of the property.

Unlock Order Content

Actions and Evidence

The Landlord's agent argued that he controlled a corporation he claimed was the landlord and that the property address was the corporation's address for service.

Unlock Order Content

Considerations

Unlock Order Content

Tenant's Arguments

Arguments

The Tenant argued that the Board lacks jurisdiction because the Landlord is not the owner of the property and no landlord-tenant relationship exists.

Unlock Order Content

Actions and Evidence

The Tenant provided land registry documentation proving that the named occupant, a corporation owned by the Tenants, is the registered owner of the property.

Unlock Order Content

Considerations

Unlock Order Content
Professional business person

Reach Landlords & Tenants

Advertise your legal or rental services to our audience

Sponsored

Similar Cases

Click to switch between order outcomes

Toronto Community Housing Corporation v Palacios

Contested Dispute
Landlord Wins

The LTB found that an unauthorized occupant committed illegal acts and impaired safety at the residential complex, but granted the Tenant conditional relief from eviction.

Landlord Aggravating Factor
Tenant Aggravating Factor
Testimony Contested
Eviction Relief Granted
ContentionExtreme

Saickley Enterprises Ltd. v Holst

Contested Dispute
Landlord Wins
July 31, 2026
Ottawa

The LTB terminated the tenancy and ordered eviction based on an unfulfilled agreement to terminate, requiring the tenant to pay the filing fee.

Landlord Aggravating Factor
Tenant Aggravating Factor
ContentionLow

Singh and Thind Holding Inc. v Boyd

Contested Dispute
Landlord Wins
July 31, 2026
Review Order

The LTB denied a tenant's review request of a consent termination order, finding no serious error or valid grounds to overturn the agreement despite changed financial circumstances.

Landlord Aggravating Factor
Tenant Aggravating Factor
ContentionModerate

Maebrook Rideau Inc. v Hiyadi

Contested Dispute
Landlord Wins

The Landlord was granted an order terminating the tenancy and requiring the Tenant to pay rent arrears following the Tenant's departure from the unit.

Landlord Aggravating Factor
Tenant Aggravating Factor
ContentionLow

Toronto Community Housing Corporation v Palacios

Contested Dispute
Landlord Wins

The LTB found that an unauthorized occupant committed illegal acts and impaired safety at the residential complex, but granted the Tenant conditional relief from eviction.

Landlord Aggravating Factor
Tenant Aggravating Factor
Testimony Contested
Eviction Relief Granted
ContentionExtreme

Saickley Enterprises Ltd. v Holst

Contested Dispute
Landlord Wins
July 31, 2026
Ottawa

The LTB terminated the tenancy and ordered eviction based on an unfulfilled agreement to terminate, requiring the tenant to pay the filing fee.

Landlord Aggravating Factor
Tenant Aggravating Factor
ContentionLow

Singh and Thind Holding Inc. v Boyd

Contested Dispute
Landlord Wins
July 31, 2026
Review Order

The LTB denied a tenant's review request of a consent termination order, finding no serious error or valid grounds to overturn the agreement despite changed financial circumstances.

Landlord Aggravating Factor
Tenant Aggravating Factor
ContentionModerate

Maebrook Rideau Inc. v Hiyadi

Contested Dispute
Landlord Wins

The Landlord was granted an order terminating the tenancy and requiring the Tenant to pay rent arrears following the Tenant's departure from the unit.

Landlord Aggravating Factor
Tenant Aggravating Factor
ContentionLow

Unlock More Similar Orders

Access our complete database of similar cases to make more informed decisions and better understand LTB rulings.

Compare outcomes of similar cases to assess your position

Analyze patterns in LTB decisions for your case type

Build stronger arguments with real case references

Share:

Latest Insights from Our Blog

Stay informed with expert analysis on rental law, tenant rights, and LTB decisions

Need Legal Help? We've Got You Covered

Whether you need to find qualified legal professionals or post your specific legal needs to get competitive quotes, our platform connects you with the right help.

Find Legal Professionals

Browse our directory of verified paralegals and lawyers specializing in Ontario rental law and LTB matters.

Browse Professionals

Post Your Legal Needs

Describe your legal situation and receive competitive quotes from qualified professionals in our marketplace.

Post a Bounty

Join thousands of Ontarians who have found legal help through our platform