Del Condominium Rentals inc v Mutanda - LTB Upholds Tenant Termination
LTB denies tenant's motion to set aside order terminating tenancy after tenant signed N9 notice
Summarized by RentZenLast updated: September 12, 2024
Case Summary
2731 Mabelle Ave, Etobicoke, ON M9A0C8
Decision in favor of
landlord
Previous Order
Upheld
Dispute Categories
Notices Sent
Agree with the ruling?
Timeline
Tenancy End Date
Oct 2023
Hearing Date
Jan 2024
Order Date
Feb 8, 2024
Dispute Summary
The landlord applied for an order to terminate the tenancy and evict the tenant because the tenant gave notice to terminate the tenancy. The tenant filed a motion to set aside the order issued without a hearing.
Determinations
- Tenant signed N9 notice to terminate tenancy
- Tenant understood consequences of signing N9
- Landlord did not pressure tenant to sign N9
Case Study
The tenant voluntarily and intentionally signed the N9 notice to terminate the tenancy, and understood the consequences of doing so. The landlord did not pressure the tenant to sign the N9.
Arguments and Actions
Tenant
Arguments
Tenant felt pressured to sign the N9
Actions
Tenant signed N9 notice to terminate tenancy due to rent increase, but now wants to revoke the N9
Decision Summary
The tenant's motion to set aside the order is denied. The stay of the previous order is lifted on March 8, 2024, giving the tenant additional time to find alternative living accommodations.
Reason for Eviction Relief
to give the tenant additional time to find alternative living accommodations
Adjudicator Details
LTB Member
Total Orders
45
Landlord Favorable
91.1%
Tenant Favorable
8.9%
Mutual Agreement
0.0%
Need assistance from an expert?
Sponsored
Source
Similar Cases
Click to switch between case outcomes
Sripathy v Chilvers
Waterdown landlords regain possession of rental unit for personal use, tenant must vacate by January 31, 2025.
Singh v Gray
LTB upholds consent order terminating tenancy for non-payment of rent in Toronto.
Yassin v Smith
Pickering tenant faces potential eviction after dispute over rent increase and arrears
Hazelview Property Services Inc. v Fatemi
Toronto tenant evicted for non-payment of rent, owes $8,938.24 to landlord.
Sripathy v Chilvers
Waterdown landlords regain possession of rental unit for personal use, tenant must vacate by January 31, 2025.
Singh v Gray
LTB upholds consent order terminating tenancy for non-payment of rent in Toronto.
Yassin v Smith
Pickering tenant faces potential eviction after dispute over rent increase and arrears
Hazelview Property Services Inc. v Fatemi
Toronto tenant evicted for non-payment of rent, owes $8,938.24 to landlord.
Sripathy v Chilvers
Waterdown landlords regain possession of rental unit for personal use, tenant must vacate by January 31, 2025.
Singh v Gray
LTB upholds consent order terminating tenancy for non-payment of rent in Toronto.
Yassin v Smith
Pickering tenant faces potential eviction after dispute over rent increase and arrears
Hazelview Property Services Inc. v Fatemi
Toronto tenant evicted for non-payment of rent, owes $8,938.24 to landlord.
Sripathy v Chilvers
Waterdown landlords regain possession of rental unit for personal use, tenant must vacate by January 31, 2025.
Singh v Gray
LTB upholds consent order terminating tenancy for non-payment of rent in Toronto.
Yassin v Smith
Pickering tenant faces potential eviction after dispute over rent increase and arrears
Hazelview Property Services Inc. v Fatemi
Toronto tenant evicted for non-payment of rent, owes $8,938.24 to landlord.
Goklani v Cannata
Toronto tenants' maintenance dispute against landlord dismissed by LTB
Jeff v Ferguson
Woodstock landlords awarded $35,186 in rent arrears, tenants face eviction for non-payment.
Oxford Properties Group v Benjamin
Tenant ordered to pay $22,461.70 for flood damage with conditional tenancy preservation
Sufi Properties Ltd v Nieman
Tenants ordered to pay $16,866 in rent arrears to Former Landlord after complex dispute.