Landlord Wins Eviction Case Against Disruptive Tenant: Chawla v Singh
Brampton landlords awarded $3787 in damages against disruptive tenant ordered to vacate
Summarized by RentZenLast updated: September 12, 2024
Case Summary
Unit ****, 222 Queenmary Dr, Brampton, ON L7A1Y9
Decision in favor of
landlord
Balance Owed to Landlord
$3,787
Dispute Categories
Notices Sent
Agree with the ruling?
Timeline
Hearing Date
Sep 2023
Order Date
Oct 5, 2023
Tenancy End Date
Oct 2023
Dispute Summary
Landlords applied to terminate the tenancy and evict the Tenant due to the Tenant's persistent late payment of rent, substantial interference with the reasonable enjoyment or lawful right, privilege or interest of the Landlords or another tenant, and wilful or negligent damage to the premises. The Landlords also claimed compensation for the Tenant's unpaid utilities, internet, and damage to the rental unit.
Determinations
- Tenant persistently failed to pay rent on time
- Tenant substantially interfered with the reasonable enjoyment or lawful right, privilege or interest of the Landlords or another tenant
- Tenant wilfully or negligently caused damage to the premises
- Tenant owes $340 for undue damage, $775.41 for unpaid utilities, and $104 for unpaid internet
Case Study
The Landlords have proven the grounds for termination of the tenancy and the claims for compensation. The Tenant persistently failed to pay rent on time, substantially interfered with the reasonable enjoyment or lawful right, privilege or interest of the Landlords or another tenant, and wilfully or negligently caused damage to the premises. The Tenant did not void the notices of termination or correct the issues. The Landlords are entitled to the requested compensation.
Decision Summary
The tenancy is terminated effective October 16, 2023. The Tenant must vacate the rental unit by that date. The Tenant is ordered to pay the Landlords $3,787.11, which includes rent arrears, undue damage, unpaid utilities and internet, and the application filing fee, minus the rent deposit and interest.
Adjudicator Details
LTB Member
Total Orders
228
Landlord Favorable
79.8%
Tenant Favorable
12.7%
Mutual Agreement
7.5%
Need assistance from an expert?
Sponsored
Financial Details
Lawful Rent
$800
Application Fee
$186
Rent Deposit
$800
Deposit Interest
$27
Damages
$340
Other Owed Amount
$879
Unpaid utilities and internet
Total Owing
$3,787 (Owed to Landlord)
Source
Similar Cases
Click to switch between case outcomes
Sripathy v Chilvers
Waterdown landlords regain possession of rental unit for personal use, tenant must vacate by January 31, 2025.
Singh v Gray
LTB upholds consent order terminating tenancy for non-payment of rent in Toronto.
Yassin v Smith
Pickering tenant faces potential eviction after dispute over rent increase and arrears
Hazelview Property Services Inc. v Fatemi
Toronto tenant evicted for non-payment of rent, owes $8,938.24 to landlord.
Sripathy v Chilvers
Waterdown landlords regain possession of rental unit for personal use, tenant must vacate by January 31, 2025.
Singh v Gray
LTB upholds consent order terminating tenancy for non-payment of rent in Toronto.
Yassin v Smith
Pickering tenant faces potential eviction after dispute over rent increase and arrears
Hazelview Property Services Inc. v Fatemi
Toronto tenant evicted for non-payment of rent, owes $8,938.24 to landlord.
Sripathy v Chilvers
Waterdown landlords regain possession of rental unit for personal use, tenant must vacate by January 31, 2025.
Singh v Gray
LTB upholds consent order terminating tenancy for non-payment of rent in Toronto.
Yassin v Smith
Pickering tenant faces potential eviction after dispute over rent increase and arrears
Hazelview Property Services Inc. v Fatemi
Toronto tenant evicted for non-payment of rent, owes $8,938.24 to landlord.
Sripathy v Chilvers
Waterdown landlords regain possession of rental unit for personal use, tenant must vacate by January 31, 2025.
Singh v Gray
LTB upholds consent order terminating tenancy for non-payment of rent in Toronto.
Yassin v Smith
Pickering tenant faces potential eviction after dispute over rent increase and arrears
Hazelview Property Services Inc. v Fatemi
Toronto tenant evicted for non-payment of rent, owes $8,938.24 to landlord.
Goklani v Cannata
Toronto tenants' maintenance dispute against landlord dismissed by LTB
Jeff v Ferguson
Woodstock landlords awarded $35,186 in rent arrears, tenants face eviction for non-payment.
Oxford Properties Group v Benjamin
Tenant ordered to pay $22,461.70 for flood damage with conditional tenancy preservation
Sufi Properties Ltd v Nieman
Tenants ordered to pay $16,866 in rent arrears to Former Landlord after complex dispute.