Cai v Taylor
Last updated: August 9, 2026
Order
Dispute resolved in
Agreement
Previous Order
Upheld
Agree with the ruling?
PDF provided by the Ontario LTB Order Catalogue
Citation: Cai v Taylor, LTB-L-005973-24-RV
File Number: LTB-L-005973-24
Timeline
Hearing Date
Oct 2025
Order Date
Jan 13, 2026
Decision
The Tenant's request for review was granted in part. Paragraph 9 of the previous order was amended to clarify compensation for use and occupation, acknowledging that the previous finding was made without sufficient evidence or argument. The stay of the previous order was lifted.
Dispute
The Tenant requested a review of an L2 Order based on an N12 application. The Tenant argued that the previous order included a determination on daily compensation that was not raised or evidenced at the original hearing. The Adjudicator found that a serious error occurred and amended the previous order accordingly.
Determinations
- The request for review is granted on the narrow issue of paragraph 9 of the L2 Order determination section.
- The Landlord's request to add an additional applicant was retracted.
- The L2 Order contained a serious error by determining daily compensation without evidence or submissions during the hearing.
- No serious error was found regarding the Landlord's N12 compensation payment.
Landlord's Arguments
Actions and Evidence
The Landlord sought daily compensation for the period after the termination date.
Procedural Errors
The Landlord failed to provide evidence for the compensation claim at the initial hearing.
Considerations
Tenant's Arguments
Arguments
The Tenant argued that the adjudicator made a serious error by determining compensation without hearing evidence.
Actions and Evidence
The Tenant challenged the inclusion of daily compensation in the previous order, stating that the issue was not raised at the original hearing.
Considerations
Similar Cases
Click to switch between order outcomes
The LTB terminated the tenancy for purchaser's own use under section 69 of the Act, granting a brief postponement of eviction under section 83.
McKenna v Keelan-Bishop
An LTB adjudicator granted a landlord's personal use eviction application, finding a good faith intent to occupy the unit despite previous notices and maintenance complaints, while granting a postponed eviction date due to tenant hardship.
The LTB denied the tenant's review request, confirming the original termination order issued for the landlord's personal use.
Chen v Alshehadat
The LTB terminated the tenancy for personal use, finding the Landlord established a genuine good faith intent to occupy the rental unit due to medical and caregiving needs.
The LTB terminated the tenancy for purchaser's own use under section 69 of the Act, granting a brief postponement of eviction under section 83.
McKenna v Keelan-Bishop
An LTB adjudicator granted a landlord's personal use eviction application, finding a good faith intent to occupy the unit despite previous notices and maintenance complaints, while granting a postponed eviction date due to tenant hardship.
The LTB denied the tenant's review request, confirming the original termination order issued for the landlord's personal use.
Chen v Alshehadat
The LTB terminated the tenancy for personal use, finding the Landlord established a genuine good faith intent to occupy the rental unit due to medical and caregiving needs.
The LTB terminated the tenancy for purchaser's own use under section 69 of the Act, granting a brief postponement of eviction under section 83.
McKenna v Keelan-Bishop
An LTB adjudicator granted a landlord's personal use eviction application, finding a good faith intent to occupy the unit despite previous notices and maintenance complaints, while granting a postponed eviction date due to tenant hardship.
The LTB denied the tenant's review request, confirming the original termination order issued for the landlord's personal use.
Chen v Alshehadat
The LTB terminated the tenancy for personal use, finding the Landlord established a genuine good faith intent to occupy the rental unit due to medical and caregiving needs.
The LTB terminated the tenancy for purchaser's own use under section 69 of the Act, granting a brief postponement of eviction under section 83.
McKenna v Keelan-Bishop
An LTB adjudicator granted a landlord's personal use eviction application, finding a good faith intent to occupy the unit despite previous notices and maintenance complaints, while granting a postponed eviction date due to tenant hardship.
The LTB denied the tenant's review request, confirming the original termination order issued for the landlord's personal use.
Chen v Alshehadat
The LTB terminated the tenancy for personal use, finding the Landlord established a genuine good faith intent to occupy the rental unit due to medical and caregiving needs.
Gupta v Karda
The LTB ordered the Tenant to pay for property damage repair costs and application fees after determining the Tenant caused undue damage, while dismissing the eviction claim as moot since the Tenant had already vacated.
The Landlord and Tenant Board denied the Tenant's review request of a personal use eviction order, confirming the original order and holding that review requests cannot be used to seek further relief from eviction.
Akbari v Bittorf
The Landlord's personal use eviction application was granted, but the eviction was postponed to the end of the year due to the Tenant's exceptional personal and health circumstances.
231 Bay (Hamilton) GP Inc. v Hollick
The LTB granted an eviction order for demolition under section 69 of the RTA, dismissing the tenant's claims regarding permits, compensation unit counts, and bad faith, while postponing eviction to October 31, 2026.
Latest Insights from Our Blog
Stay informed with expert analysis on rental law, tenant rights, and LTB decisions
London, Ontario Tenant Paralegals: How to Find LTB Representation and Defend Your Rights (2026)
Facing eviction or landlord harassment in London, Ontario? Learn what tenant paralegals do at the LTB, when to hire one, and meet Southwestern Ontario advocates ranked by real tribunal records.
Toronto Tenant Paralegals: How to Find LTB Representation and Defend Your Rights (2026)
Facing eviction or landlord harassment in Toronto? Learn what tenant paralegals do at the LTB, when to hire one, and meet experienced GTA advocates ranked by real tribunal case records.
When Landlords Cry Wolf: Analyzing False Claims and Bad Faith Applications at the LTB
A comprehensive analysis of dismissed landlord applications, bad faith eviction attempts, and frivolous claims reveals the consequences when property owners abuse the LTB system.
Need Legal Help? We've Got You Covered
Whether you need to find qualified legal professionals or post your specific legal needs to get competitive quotes, our platform connects you with the right help.
Find Legal Professionals
Browse our directory of verified paralegals and lawyers specializing in Ontario rental law and LTB matters.
Browse ProfessionalsPost Your Legal Needs
Describe your legal situation and receive competitive quotes from qualified professionals in our marketplace.
Post a BountyJoin thousands of Ontarians who have found legal help through our platform