Landlord Wins Non-payment Case: Baiborodin v De Guzman 2024
Richmond Hill tenants evicted for non-payment of $28261 in rent
Summarized by RentZenLast updated: September 23, 2024
Case Summary
40 Nine Mile Lane, Richmond Hill, ON L4C5S6
Decision in favor of
landlord
Balance Owed to Landlord
$28,261
Dispute Categories
Notices Sent
Agree with the ruling?
Timeline
Application Date (Estimate)
Dec 2023
Hearing Date
Jun 2024
Order Date
Jul 16, 2024
Tenancy End Date
Jul 2024
We estimate Application Date using rent arrears.
Dispute Summary
The landlords applied to terminate the tenancy and evict the tenant due to non-payment of rent. The parties reached an agreement during the mediation session.
Determinations
- Parties agreed to a final, non-voidable eviction order
- Tenant does not have option to void eviction order by paying arrears
- Current monthly rent is $4,300, due on the 16th of each month
- Total amount owed by tenant is $28,261, including $28,075 in rent arrears and $186 in costs
- Landlords waived the application filing fee
- Landlords collected a last month's rent deposit of $3,895, to be applied to the rent for June 16 - July 15, 2024
Case Study
The parties agreed to a final, non-voidable eviction order with an eviction date of July 31, 2024. The tenant does not have the option to void the eviction order by paying the outstanding rent arrears.
Decision Summary
The tenancy is terminated effective July 31, 2024. The tenant must pay the landlords $28,075 in rent arrears and $186 in costs by July 31, 2024. If the tenant does not vacate the unit by July 31, 2024, the landlords can file the order with the Court Enforcement Office (Sheriff) to enforce the eviction starting August 1, 2024.
Adjudicator Details
LTB Member
Total Orders
15
Landlord Favorable
60.0%
Tenant Favorable
0.0%
Mutual Agreement
40.0%
Need assistance from an expert?
Sponsored
Financial Details
Lawful Rent
$4,300
Rent Arrears
$28,075
Application Fee
$186
Rent Deposit
$3,895
Total Owing
$28,261 (Owed to Landlord)
Source
Similar Cases
Click to switch between case outcomes
Sripathy v Chilvers
Waterdown landlords regain possession of rental unit for personal use, tenant must vacate by January 31, 2025.
Singh v Gray
LTB upholds consent order terminating tenancy for non-payment of rent in Toronto.
Yassin v Smith
Pickering tenant faces potential eviction after dispute over rent increase and arrears
Hazelview Property Services Inc. v Fatemi
Toronto tenant evicted for non-payment of rent, owes $8,938.24 to landlord.
Sripathy v Chilvers
Waterdown landlords regain possession of rental unit for personal use, tenant must vacate by January 31, 2025.
Singh v Gray
LTB upholds consent order terminating tenancy for non-payment of rent in Toronto.
Yassin v Smith
Pickering tenant faces potential eviction after dispute over rent increase and arrears
Hazelview Property Services Inc. v Fatemi
Toronto tenant evicted for non-payment of rent, owes $8,938.24 to landlord.
Sripathy v Chilvers
Waterdown landlords regain possession of rental unit for personal use, tenant must vacate by January 31, 2025.
Singh v Gray
LTB upholds consent order terminating tenancy for non-payment of rent in Toronto.
Yassin v Smith
Pickering tenant faces potential eviction after dispute over rent increase and arrears
Hazelview Property Services Inc. v Fatemi
Toronto tenant evicted for non-payment of rent, owes $8,938.24 to landlord.
Sripathy v Chilvers
Waterdown landlords regain possession of rental unit for personal use, tenant must vacate by January 31, 2025.
Singh v Gray
LTB upholds consent order terminating tenancy for non-payment of rent in Toronto.
Yassin v Smith
Pickering tenant faces potential eviction after dispute over rent increase and arrears
Hazelview Property Services Inc. v Fatemi
Toronto tenant evicted for non-payment of rent, owes $8,938.24 to landlord.
Goklani v Cannata
Toronto tenants' maintenance dispute against landlord dismissed by LTB
Jeff v Ferguson
Woodstock landlords awarded $35,186 in rent arrears, tenants face eviction for non-payment.
Oxford Properties Group v Benjamin
Tenant ordered to pay $22,461.70 for flood damage with conditional tenancy preservation
Sufi Properties Ltd v Nieman
Tenants ordered to pay $16,866 in rent arrears to Former Landlord after complex dispute.