Simplify rentals with instant tenant verification
Summarized by RentZenLast updated: September 12, 2024
2307 Blue Jays Way, Toronto, ON M5V0N4
Decision in favor of
tenant
Previous Order
Overturned
Agree with the ruling?
Hearing Date
Nov 2023
Order Date
Nov 22, 2023
Landlord applied for an order to terminate the tenancy and evict the Tenant due to the Tenant's failure to meet a condition specified in a previous order issued by the Board. The Tenant filed a motion to set aside the eviction order.
The Tenant acknowledged breaching the previous order by failing to pay $375 towards rent arrears on the due date. However, the Tenant made the payment two days later. The Landlord argued the Tenant had a history of late payments, which caused them stress and inconvenience. The Board found that while the late payments were inconvenient, the Tenant had ultimately made all required payments, and the Landlord did not articulate any specific prejudice they would experience if the tenancy continued under the previous order.
Landlord argued the Tenant is likely to continue making late payments and it would be unfair to set aside the eviction order given the history of the proceedings.
Landlord acknowledged Tenant is up to date on payments but argued Tenant has a history of late payments, which causes them stress and inconvenience.
Tenant argued it would not be unfair to set aside the eviction order given he has made all other required payments and can continue to abide by the terms of the previous order.
Tenant missed $375 payment due on his birthday, August 15, 2023, but made the payment on August 17, 2023. Tenant stated he was out of the country on his birthday and forgot to make the payment.
The Tenant's motion to set aside the eviction order is granted. The original order remains in force, and the Tenant is given one final opportunity to maintain the tenancy by complying with the remaining conditions.
Tenant's breach was not severe enough to warrant eviction, and Landlord did not demonstrate undue prejudice if tenancy continued
LTB Member
477
90.6%
4.4%
5.0%
Need assistance from an expert?
Sponsored
Click to switch between case outcomes
Waterdown landlords regain possession of rental unit for personal use, tenant must vacate by January 31, 2025.
LTB upholds consent order terminating tenancy for non-payment of rent in Toronto.
Pickering tenant faces potential eviction after dispute over rent increase and arrears
Toronto tenant evicted for non-payment of rent, owes $8,938.24 to landlord.
Waterdown landlords regain possession of rental unit for personal use, tenant must vacate by January 31, 2025.
LTB upholds consent order terminating tenancy for non-payment of rent in Toronto.
Pickering tenant faces potential eviction after dispute over rent increase and arrears
Toronto tenant evicted for non-payment of rent, owes $8,938.24 to landlord.
Waterdown landlords regain possession of rental unit for personal use, tenant must vacate by January 31, 2025.
LTB upholds consent order terminating tenancy for non-payment of rent in Toronto.
Pickering tenant faces potential eviction after dispute over rent increase and arrears
Toronto tenant evicted for non-payment of rent, owes $8,938.24 to landlord.
Waterdown landlords regain possession of rental unit for personal use, tenant must vacate by January 31, 2025.
LTB upholds consent order terminating tenancy for non-payment of rent in Toronto.
Pickering tenant faces potential eviction after dispute over rent increase and arrears
Toronto tenant evicted for non-payment of rent, owes $8,938.24 to landlord.
Toronto tenants' maintenance dispute against landlord dismissed by LTB
Woodstock landlords awarded $35,186 in rent arrears, tenants face eviction for non-payment.
Tenant ordered to pay $22,461.70 for flood damage with conditional tenancy preservation
Tenants ordered to pay $16,866 in rent arrears to Former Landlord after complex dispute.