Landlord Wins Personal Use Case: Ajayi v Nicholl 2024
Brampton tenant evicted for landlord's personal use, owes $9468 in compensation
Summarized by RentZenLast updated: October 13, 2024
Case Summary
103 Chipmunk Cres, Brampton, ON L6R1B4
Decision in favor of
landlord
Balance Owed to Landlord
$6,965
Dispute Categories
Notices Sent
Agree with the ruling?
Timeline
Application Date
Dec 2023
Hearing Date
Feb 2024
Order Date
Mar 13, 2024
Tenancy End Date
Mar 2024
Dispute Summary
Landlord applied for an order to terminate the tenancy and evict the Tenant because the Landlord has entered into an agreement of purchase and sale of the rental unit and the purchaser in good faith requires possession of the rental unit for the purpose of residential occupation.
Determinations
- Landlord served valid N12 Notice
- Rental unit is a single family home
- Landlord entered into purchase agreement
- Purchaser requires unit for own residential use
- Landlord attempted to pay one month's rent compensation
- Tenant did not accept compensation
- Tenant owes $9,468.49 in daily compensation
- Tenant paid $9,600 in rent since termination date
- Landlord holds $2,400 rent deposit plus $103.59 interest
Decision Summary
The tenancy is terminated effective March 24, 2024. The Landlord must pay the Tenant $2,400 in compensation by March 20, 2024. The Tenant owes the Landlord $9,468.49 in daily compensation for use of the unit from November 1, 2023 to February 28, 2024, which will be deducted from the amount the Landlord owes the Tenant for the rent deposit and interest.
Adjudicator Details
LTB Member
Total Orders
41
Landlord Favorable
85.4%
Tenant Favorable
14.6%
Mutual Agreement
0.0%
Need assistance from an expert?
Sponsored
Financial Details
Lawful Rent
$2,400
Rent Deposit
$2,400
Deposit Interest
$104
Total Owing
$6,965 (Owed to Landlord)
Source
Similar Cases
Click to switch between case outcomes
Sripathy v Chilvers
Waterdown landlords regain possession of rental unit for personal use, tenant must vacate by January 31, 2025.
Singh v Gray
LTB upholds consent order terminating tenancy for non-payment of rent in Toronto.
Yassin v Smith
Pickering tenant faces potential eviction after dispute over rent increase and arrears
Hazelview Property Services Inc. v Fatemi
Toronto tenant evicted for non-payment of rent, owes $8,938.24 to landlord.
Sripathy v Chilvers
Waterdown landlords regain possession of rental unit for personal use, tenant must vacate by January 31, 2025.
Singh v Gray
LTB upholds consent order terminating tenancy for non-payment of rent in Toronto.
Yassin v Smith
Pickering tenant faces potential eviction after dispute over rent increase and arrears
Hazelview Property Services Inc. v Fatemi
Toronto tenant evicted for non-payment of rent, owes $8,938.24 to landlord.
Sripathy v Chilvers
Waterdown landlords regain possession of rental unit for personal use, tenant must vacate by January 31, 2025.
Singh v Gray
LTB upholds consent order terminating tenancy for non-payment of rent in Toronto.
Yassin v Smith
Pickering tenant faces potential eviction after dispute over rent increase and arrears
Hazelview Property Services Inc. v Fatemi
Toronto tenant evicted for non-payment of rent, owes $8,938.24 to landlord.
Sripathy v Chilvers
Waterdown landlords regain possession of rental unit for personal use, tenant must vacate by January 31, 2025.
Singh v Gray
LTB upholds consent order terminating tenancy for non-payment of rent in Toronto.
Yassin v Smith
Pickering tenant faces potential eviction after dispute over rent increase and arrears
Hazelview Property Services Inc. v Fatemi
Toronto tenant evicted for non-payment of rent, owes $8,938.24 to landlord.
Goklani v Cannata
Toronto tenants' maintenance dispute against landlord dismissed by LTB
Jeff v Ferguson
Woodstock landlords awarded $35,186 in rent arrears, tenants face eviction for non-payment.
Oxford Properties Group v Benjamin
Tenant ordered to pay $22,461.70 for flood damage with conditional tenancy preservation
Sufi Properties Ltd v Nieman
Tenants ordered to pay $16,866 in rent arrears to Former Landlord after complex dispute.