Adriano v Edouard Aka Edson Kashis Prince-Edouard
Last updated: February 7, 2026
Order
Ordered by Nicole Pedron,Tribunals Ontario under Section 78.11, Residential Tenancies Act, 2006
Decision in favor of
Landlord
Dispute Categories
Subsections of RTA Quoted
Agree with the ruling?
Citation: Adriano v Edouard Aka Edson Kashis Prince-Edouard, 2025 ONLTB 73802
File Number: LTB-L-052079-25-SA
Timeline
Hearing Date
Aug 2025
Order Date
Sep 26, 2025
Decision
The Tenant's motion to set aside the eviction order was denied. The stay of the previous order (LTB-L-052079-25) was lifted immediately. The Board found the Tenant breached the mediated settlement and did not present a realistic plan to keep up with future rent, making it unfair to the Landlord to delay eviction.
Dispute
The Landlord applied to terminate the tenancy because the Tenant failed to meet conditions specified in a mediated settlement from May 30, 2025. An eviction order was initially issued without a hearing on July 2, 2025. The Tenant subsequently filed a motion to set aside that order, claiming financial hardship due to potential job loss and reduced hours. The Tenant proposed a repayment plan that would not see rent paid on time until December 2025.
Determinations
- Tenant breached the mediated consent order dated May 30, 2025
- Tenant failed to pay June rent by June 1, 2025
- Tenant failed to make the arrears payment by June 15, 2025
- Tenant's repayment plan is not viable as it does not ensure timely rent until at least December 2025
- Tenant did not provide sufficient evidence to justify additional time to move
- Unfair to the Landlord to set aside the eviction order
Landlord's Arguments
Arguments
The Landlord opposed the motion to set aside the order, requesting the stay be lifted immediately due to the risk of accruing further arrears.
Actions and Evidence
The Landlord testified that the 'Tenant is always late with rent and always has excuses and plans that do not work out.'
Tenant's Arguments
Arguments
The Tenant argued for a stay of eviction based on financial hardship and the need for two months to find new housing.
Actions and Evidence
Tenant admitted to being behind on August rent and failing to meet the June deadlines set in the mediated settlement. He stated he 'would be late or behind on rent until at least December 1, 2025' due to uncertainty regarding his job at the Beer Store.
Considerations
History of late payments and unfulfilled repayment plans.
Need assistance from an expert?
Similar Cases
Click to switch between order outcomes
CLV Group v Avril
The Landlord and Tenant Board denied the Tenant's motion to set aside an eviction order after the Tenant admitted to breaching a payment plan, setting the eviction date for June 30, 2026.
Residential Real Estate LP v. Cornelius
The Landlord was granted an order to terminate the tenancy for non-payment of rent, with the Tenant given an opportunity to void the order by payment.
K&G Oakburn Apartments I Ltd. v Cheung
The Landlord was granted an order to terminate the tenancy and evict the Tenant after the Tenant failed to comply with the payment conditions of a previous LTB order.
Peel Housing Corp O/A Peel Living v Walters
The Landlord was granted an order to terminate the tenancy for non-payment of rent, with the Tenant provided an opportunity to void the order by paying arrears.
CLV Group v Avril
The Landlord and Tenant Board denied the Tenant's motion to set aside an eviction order after the Tenant admitted to breaching a payment plan, setting the eviction date for June 30, 2026.
Residential Real Estate LP v. Cornelius
The Landlord was granted an order to terminate the tenancy for non-payment of rent, with the Tenant given an opportunity to void the order by payment.
K&G Oakburn Apartments I Ltd. v Cheung
The Landlord was granted an order to terminate the tenancy and evict the Tenant after the Tenant failed to comply with the payment conditions of a previous LTB order.
Peel Housing Corp O/A Peel Living v Walters
The Landlord was granted an order to terminate the tenancy for non-payment of rent, with the Tenant provided an opportunity to void the order by paying arrears.
CLV Group v Avril
The Landlord and Tenant Board denied the Tenant's motion to set aside an eviction order after the Tenant admitted to breaching a payment plan, setting the eviction date for June 30, 2026.
Residential Real Estate LP v. Cornelius
The Landlord was granted an order to terminate the tenancy for non-payment of rent, with the Tenant given an opportunity to void the order by payment.
K&G Oakburn Apartments I Ltd. v Cheung
The Landlord was granted an order to terminate the tenancy and evict the Tenant after the Tenant failed to comply with the payment conditions of a previous LTB order.
Peel Housing Corp O/A Peel Living v Walters
The Landlord was granted an order to terminate the tenancy for non-payment of rent, with the Tenant provided an opportunity to void the order by paying arrears.
CLV Group v Avril
The Landlord and Tenant Board denied the Tenant's motion to set aside an eviction order after the Tenant admitted to breaching a payment plan, setting the eviction date for June 30, 2026.
Residential Real Estate LP v. Cornelius
The Landlord was granted an order to terminate the tenancy for non-payment of rent, with the Tenant given an opportunity to void the order by payment.
K&G Oakburn Apartments I Ltd. v Cheung
The Landlord was granted an order to terminate the tenancy and evict the Tenant after the Tenant failed to comply with the payment conditions of a previous LTB order.
Peel Housing Corp O/A Peel Living v Walters
The Landlord was granted an order to terminate the tenancy for non-payment of rent, with the Tenant provided an opportunity to void the order by paying arrears.
Sons of Italy Housing Emerald Corp. v. Armstrong and McClemont
The Board denied the Tenants' motion to set aside an eviction order because there was no abuse of process and the eviction was conducted lawfully.
Equiton Residential Income Fund LP v Mote
The Tenant's motion to set aside a previous order for breach of conditions was denied on consent, and the stay on the original order was lifted.
The Landlord was granted an eviction order because the Tenants failed to pay rent arrears as required by a previous LTB order.
M & R Suites Inc. v Smith
The Landlord was granted an eviction order because the Tenant failed to pay arrears as required by a previous LTB order.
Latest Insights from Our Blog
Stay informed with expert analysis on rental law, tenant rights, and LTB decisions
When Payment Plans Fail: Understanding Breach of Conditional Orders and Second Chances at the LTB
Exploring what happens when tenants default on LTB-ordered payment plans, the strict consequences of breaching conditional orders, and the rare circumstances where further relief might be granted in Ontario.
Rent Withholding and Set-Off Rights: When Tenants Can Legally Stop Paying Rent in Ontario
Understand the legal boundaries of rent withholding in Ontario through real LTB cases, learning when it's justified versus when it leads to eviction and financial consequences.
The Maintenance Balance: Understanding Reasonable Expectations Between Landlords and Tenants in Ontario
Explore the delicate balance between landlord maintenance obligations and tenant expectations through real LTB cases, learning what constitutes reasonable requests versus unrealistic demands.
Need Legal Help? We've Got You Covered
Whether you need to find qualified legal professionals or post your specific legal needs to get competitive quotes, our platform connects you with the right help.
Find Legal Professionals
Browse our directory of verified paralegals and lawyers specializing in Ontario rental law and LTB matters.
Browse ProfessionalsPost Your Legal Needs
Describe your legal situation and receive competitive quotes from qualified professionals in our marketplace.
Post a BountyJoin thousands of Ontarians who have found legal help through our platform