Last updated: July 22, 2024
Ordered by Tribunals Ontario under Section 69, Residential Tenancies Act 2006
Decision in favor of
Landlord
Monies to be paid
-
Agree with the ruling?
Hearing Date
Oct 2021
Order Date
Mar 8, 2022
The Tenant's application was dismissed. The Landlord was found to have responded to the water leak complaint within a reasonable time, stopped the leak, dried the affected areas, and carried out necessary repairs. The Tenant failed to provide sufficient evidence to support their claim of property damage.
Tenant applied for an order determining that Landlord failed to meet maintenance obligations under the Residential Tenancies Act, 2006 or failed to comply with health, safety, housing or maintenance standards. The dispute centered around a water leak incident on February 14, 2018.
Landlord argued that they responded to the complaint within a reasonable time and took appropriate measures to address the issue.
Landlord's agent responded to the complaint on the same day, stopped the leak, dried the carpet and floor, and hired contractors for repairs and painting.
Tenant argued that the Landlord failed to meet maintenance obligations under the Residential Tenancies Act, 2006.
Tenant reported a water leak on February 14, 2018. Tenant claimed damage to books, television, television stand, and laptop but provided no evidence of damage.
Tenant failed to provide evidence of damage to personal belongings.
Need assistance from an expert?
Sponsored
Click to switch between order outcomes
Waterloo tenants face eviction for non-payment of $45,500 rent, ordered to pay $36,617.97 to landlord.
Gloucester tenants face eviction for $22,257.05 in unpaid rent, given until January 31, 2025 to vacate.
Hamilton landlord wins eviction case against tenant who failed to pay $10,805.94 in rent arrears.
Hamilton landlord wins non-payment case, tenant ordered to pay $10,202.48 or face eviction.
Waterloo tenants face eviction for non-payment of $45,500 rent, ordered to pay $36,617.97 to landlord.
Gloucester tenants face eviction for $22,257.05 in unpaid rent, given until January 31, 2025 to vacate.
Hamilton landlord wins eviction case against tenant who failed to pay $10,805.94 in rent arrears.
Hamilton landlord wins non-payment case, tenant ordered to pay $10,202.48 or face eviction.
Waterloo tenants face eviction for non-payment of $45,500 rent, ordered to pay $36,617.97 to landlord.
Gloucester tenants face eviction for $22,257.05 in unpaid rent, given until January 31, 2025 to vacate.
Hamilton landlord wins eviction case against tenant who failed to pay $10,805.94 in rent arrears.
Hamilton landlord wins non-payment case, tenant ordered to pay $10,202.48 or face eviction.
Waterloo tenants face eviction for non-payment of $45,500 rent, ordered to pay $36,617.97 to landlord.
Gloucester tenants face eviction for $22,257.05 in unpaid rent, given until January 31, 2025 to vacate.
Hamilton landlord wins eviction case against tenant who failed to pay $10,805.94 in rent arrears.
Hamilton landlord wins non-payment case, tenant ordered to pay $10,202.48 or face eviction.
Cornwall landlords win personal use eviction, but tenants granted delayed enforcement due to hardship.
Ontario court dismisses defendant's motion and awards costs to plaintiffs due to procedural failures.
Oshawa co-op member faces eviction for non-payment and persistent late payment of housing charges, owes $14,344.
Toronto tenant faces eviction for landlord's personal use, given additional time to move out.
